Fixed-dose combination fluticasone/formoterol for asthma treatment in a real-world setting: meta-analysis of exacerbation rates and asthma control.

Asthma fixed-dose combination fluticasone formoterol meta-analysis real-world setting

Journal

European clinical respiratory journal
ISSN: 2001-8525
Titre abrégé: Eur Clin Respir J
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101662134

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2023
Historique:
entrez: 23 2 2023
pubmed: 24 2 2023
medline: 24 2 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Treatment guidelines for asthma management are derived almost exclusively from the results of controlled clinical trials undertaken in carefully selected patient populations; meaning that their outcomes may not reflect the true performance of treatments when used in general daily medical practice. The aim of this meta-analysis was to combine the results of observational studies investigating the fluticasone propionate/formoterol (FP/FORM) fixed-dose combination in real-world asthma patients. A systemic literature review was completed in March 2019 using the PubMed database. We identified 394 studies. Five studies, which included a total of 4756 patients treated with FP/FORM, were judged eligible and included in the meta-analysis. The estimated severe asthma exacerbation rate was 11.47% (95% CI, 5.8 to 18.72%), calculated from the random effect model. A sensitivity analysis excluding 2 studies (one was an outlier, and the exacerbation rate for the studied treatment alone could not be determined in the other) showed a 7.04% rate of severe asthma exacerbations. The estimated relative risk of the incidence of severe asthma exacerbations was 0.323 (95% CI, 0.159 to 0.658). The estimated asthma control rate was 60.6% (95% CI, 55.7% to 65.6%). The odds of achieving asthma control significantly increased by FP/FORM compared with pre-study conditions (estimated odds ratio: 2.214 [95% CI, 1.292 to 3.795]; The findings of this meta-analysis confirm the effectiveness of FP/FORM for the treatment of asthma patients in a real-world setting beyond the limitations of RCTs.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Treatment guidelines for asthma management are derived almost exclusively from the results of controlled clinical trials undertaken in carefully selected patient populations; meaning that their outcomes may not reflect the true performance of treatments when used in general daily medical practice. The aim of this meta-analysis was to combine the results of observational studies investigating the fluticasone propionate/formoterol (FP/FORM) fixed-dose combination in real-world asthma patients.
METHODS METHODS
A systemic literature review was completed in March 2019 using the PubMed database. We identified 394 studies. Five studies, which included a total of 4756 patients treated with FP/FORM, were judged eligible and included in the meta-analysis.
RESULTS RESULTS
The estimated severe asthma exacerbation rate was 11.47% (95% CI, 5.8 to 18.72%), calculated from the random effect model. A sensitivity analysis excluding 2 studies (one was an outlier, and the exacerbation rate for the studied treatment alone could not be determined in the other) showed a 7.04% rate of severe asthma exacerbations. The estimated relative risk of the incidence of severe asthma exacerbations was 0.323 (95% CI, 0.159 to 0.658). The estimated asthma control rate was 60.6% (95% CI, 55.7% to 65.6%). The odds of achieving asthma control significantly increased by FP/FORM compared with pre-study conditions (estimated odds ratio: 2.214 [95% CI, 1.292 to 3.795];
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
The findings of this meta-analysis confirm the effectiveness of FP/FORM for the treatment of asthma patients in a real-world setting beyond the limitations of RCTs.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36815940
doi: 10.1080/20018525.2023.2174642
pii: 2174642
pmc: PMC9930770
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Pagination

2174642

Informations de copyright

© 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Mundipharma was not involved in the study design, data collection, analysis or interpretation. Mundipharma reviewed the written manuscript and was involved in the decision to submit it for publication.

Références

Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2017;237:117-129
pubmed: 27783268
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2017 Sep - Oct;5(5):1378-1387.e5
pubmed: 28351782
Thorax. 2007 Mar;62(3):219-23
pubmed: 17105779
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Apr 14;(4):CD005533
pubmed: 20393943
Respirology. 2019 Oct;24(10):972-979
pubmed: 31038269
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2002 Dec;110(6 Suppl):S261-8
pubmed: 12464934
BMJ. 2016 Oct 12;355:i4919
pubmed: 27733354
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Sep;83(9):2077-2086
pubmed: 28425216
Eur Respir J. 2014 Feb;43(2):343-73
pubmed: 24337046
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jan 24;(1):CD003137
pubmed: 24459050
Respir Med. 2016 Jul;116:19-27
pubmed: 27296816
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000 Mar;161(3 Pt 1):769-74
pubmed: 10712320
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Dec 07;(12):CD004106
pubmed: 22161385
Respir Med. 2005 Jan;99(1):11-9
pubmed: 15672843
Control Clin Trials. 1986 Sep;7(3):177-88
pubmed: 3802833
Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2007 May;4(3):215-34
pubmed: 17489650
Lancet. 2017 Nov 18;390(10109):2247-2255
pubmed: 28903864
Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2015 Dec;9(6):281-93
pubmed: 26037949
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2003 Dec;56(6):588-99
pubmed: 14616418
Prim Care Respir J. 2013 Dec;22(4):439-48
pubmed: 24186700
Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2018 Jan-Dec;12:1753466618796987
pubmed: 30232933
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005 Dec 15;172(12):1497-504
pubmed: 16192448
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2014 Jun 12;24:14009
pubmed: 24921985
Open Heart. 2018 Apr 21;5(1):e000788
pubmed: 29713485
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011 Mar 1;183(5):589-95
pubmed: 20889908
ERJ Open Res. 2015 Sep 14;1(1):
pubmed: 27730134
Respir Med. 2010 Sep;104(9):1237-45
pubmed: 20472415
Adv Ther. 2015 Jun;32(6):567-79
pubmed: 26100350
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999 Nov;160(5 Pt 1):1532-9
pubmed: 10556116
J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2016 Aug;29(4):346-61
pubmed: 27104231
J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2013 Aug;26(4):190-9
pubmed: 23098325
J Asthma Allergy. 2015 Sep 23;8:93-103
pubmed: 26445555
Allergy Asthma Immunol Res. 2014 Sep;6(5):376-88
pubmed: 25228994
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997 Sep;156(3 Pt 1):737-43
pubmed: 9309987
Respir Med. 2017 Oct;131:166-174
pubmed: 28947024
Respir Med. 2017 Aug;129:199-206
pubmed: 28732831
BMJ. 2003 Sep 6;327(7414):557-60
pubmed: 12958120

Auteurs

Alberto Papi (A)

Chair of Respiratory Medicine, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.

Murtaza Qasuri (M)

Regional Therapeutic Leadership Team, Zuellig Pharma Therapeutics, Singapore, Singapore.

Ernestine Chung (E)

Respiratory & Ophthalmology, Mundipharma, Asia Pacific, Singapore.

Mohamed Abdelbaset (M)

Head of Medical Affairs & Compliance, Mundipharma Saudi Arabia, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Mohamed Aly Moussa (M)

Medical Specialist, Clinical Ops & Research, Medical Information, Mundipharma GCC, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.

Vibeke Backer (V)

Department of Respiratory Medicine, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Olaf Schmidt (O)

Pulmonary Group Practice, Koblenz, Germany.

Omar Usmani (O)

National Heart and Lung Institute (NHLI), Imperial College London, London, UK.

Classifications MeSH