Biobanking and use of gonadal tissues - a promising strategy for conserving wildlife from the Caatinga biome.

biodiversity genome resource banking ovarian tissue testicular tissue wildlife conservation

Journal

Animal reproduction
ISSN: 1984-3143
Titre abrégé: Anim Reprod
Pays: Brazil
ID NLM: 101272804

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2022
Historique:
received: 02 01 2023
accepted: 24 01 2023
entrez: 23 2 2023
pubmed: 24 2 2023
medline: 24 2 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Biological Resource Banks (BRB) or Genetic Resource Banks (GRB) are critical tools for the conservation of animal biodiversity. According to the International Union for Conservation of Nature, more than 38,500 species are threatened with extinction, out of a total of 138,300 surveyed species. These banks are repositories of biological samples and data recovered and preserved for the long term by zoos, universities, research centers and other conservation organizations. In recent years, BRB have increasingly included ovarian and testicular tissues as additional options to rescue and propagate wild species, especially those at risk of extinction. After in vitro culture or grafting, gonadal tissues are potential sources of matured gametes that can be used for Assisted Reproduction Technologies while informing about gametogenesis or mechanisms involved in infertility. It therefore is crucial to properly recover, cryopreserve, and culture these tissues using species-specific protocols. Developing BRBs is currently one of the strategies to preserve species from the Caatinga biome - an exclusively Brazilian biome with a rich wild fauna that suffers from anthropogenic activities. Among wild species from this biome, studies have been primarily conducted in collared peccaries, agoutis, cavies, and armadillos to preserve their ovarian and testicular tissues. Additionally, domestic species such as the domestic cat and donkeys have been proposed as models for wild species that are phylogenetically close. This review addresses the main technical aspects involved in obtaining BRB derived from gonadal tissues in some wild species of the Caatinga biome. It reports recent advances and perspectives to use these biological materials for wildlife conservation.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36819484
doi: 10.1590/1984-3143-AR2022-0135
pii: ar20220135
pmc: PMC9924771
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e20220135

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflicts of interest: The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Références

Reprod Fertil Dev. 2018 Mar;30(3):459-468
pubmed: 28784201
Biopreserv Biobank. 2022 Nov 21;:
pubmed: 36409545
Cryo Letters. 2021 Nov-Dec;42(6):309-320
pubmed: 35366296
Biopreserv Biobank. 2019 Aug;17(4):334-341
pubmed: 30896983
Anim Reprod. 2020 May 22;16(1):52-65
pubmed: 33936289
Animals (Basel). 2022 Mar 16;12(6):
pubmed: 35327135
Biopreserv Biobank. 2020 Jun;18(3):235-243
pubmed: 32282240
Hum Reprod. 2002 Dec;17(12):3039-45
pubmed: 12456600
Cryobiology. 2019 Dec;91:53-60
pubmed: 31678072
Anat Histol Embryol. 2013 Aug;42(4):304-11
pubmed: 23278244
Science. 2019 Mar 22;363(6433):1314-1319
pubmed: 30898927
Reproduction. 2013 Nov 16;147(1):13-9
pubmed: 24101585
Reprod Domest Anim. 2018 Aug;53(4):880-888
pubmed: 29604127
Reprod Fertil Dev. 2012;24(6):877-85
pubmed: 22781939
Reprod Domest Anim. 2020 Feb;55(2):154-161
pubmed: 31804747
Reproduction. 2002 Apr;123(4):593-600
pubmed: 11914121
Biopreserv Biobank. 2022 Apr;20(2):204-207
pubmed: 34491078
Reprod Fertil Dev. 2017 Mar;29(3):594-602
pubmed: 28442066
J Androl. 2010 Mar-Apr;31(2):221-30
pubmed: 19745218
Anim Reprod. 2021 Jun 02;18(2):e20210024
pubmed: 34122656
Anim Reprod Sci. 2017 Dec;187:193-202
pubmed: 29126831
Anim Reprod Sci. 1999 Aug 16;56(3-4):223-36
pubmed: 10497918
Biopreserv Biobank. 2022 Feb;20(1):90-96
pubmed: 34726507
Reprod Fertil Dev. 2017 Feb;29(2):383-393
pubmed: 26336816
Anim Reprod. 2018 Dec 05;15(4):1181-1192
pubmed: 34221130
Cryobiology. 2019 Dec;91:77-83
pubmed: 31639331
Zoo Biol. 2018 May 3;:
pubmed: 29722907
Anim Reprod Sci. 2009 Jun;112(3-4):347-61
pubmed: 18585877
Theriogenology. 2021 Jun;167:111-119
pubmed: 33813051
Theriogenology. 2012 Jan 15;77(2):260-7
pubmed: 21924476
Front Genet. 2022 Sep 26;13:1009220
pubmed: 36226169
Anim Reprod Sci. 2019 Jun;205:126-133
pubmed: 31047761
Reprod Domest Anim. 2020 Aug;55(8):958-964
pubmed: 32473042
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 29;8(7):e70989
pubmed: 23923039
Reproduction. 2014 Feb 03;147(3):291-9
pubmed: 24324205
Anim Reprod Sci. 2021 Mar;226:106717
pubmed: 33579546
Cryobiology. 2021 Dec;103:123-128
pubmed: 34454959
Reprod Domest Anim. 2018 Oct;53(5):1060-1067
pubmed: 29809292

Auteurs

Alexandre Rodrigues Silva (AR)

Laboratório de Conservação de Germoplasma Animal, Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido, Mossoró, RN, Brasil.

Alexsandra Fernandes Pereira (AF)

Laboratório de Biotecnologia Animal, Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido, Mossoró, RN, Brasil.

Pierre Comizzoli (P)

Smithsonian National Zoo and Conservation Biology Institute, Washington, USA.

Classifications MeSH