Should organs at risk (OARs) be prioritized over target volume coverage in stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for oligometastases? a secondary analysis of the population-based phase II SABR-5 trial.

Coverage compromise index Oligometastases Oligometastasis SABR SABR-5 SBRT Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy Stereotactic body radiation therapy

Journal

Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology
ISSN: 1879-0887
Titre abrégé: Radiother Oncol
Pays: Ireland
ID NLM: 8407192

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 2023
Historique:
received: 09 12 2022
revised: 26 01 2023
accepted: 12 02 2023
medline: 25 4 2023
pubmed: 24 2 2023
entrez: 23 2 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for oligometastases may improve survival, however concerns about safety remain. To mitigate risk of toxicity, target coverage was sacrificed to prioritize organs-at-risk (OARs) during SABR planning in the population-based SABR-5 trial. This study evaluated the effect of this practice on dosimetry, local recurrence (LR), and progression-free survival (PFS). This single-arm phase II trial included patients with up to 5 oligometastases between November 2016 and July 2020. Theprotocol-specified planning objective was to cover 95 % of the planning target volume (PTV) with 100 % of the prescribed dose, however PTV coverage was reduced as needed to meet OAR constraints. This trade-off was measured using the coverage compromise index (CCI), computed as minimum dose received by the hottest 99 % of the PTV (D99) divided by the prescription dose. Under-coverage was defined as CCI < 0.90. The potential association between CCI and outcomes was evaluated. 549 lesions from 381 patients were assessed. Mean CCI was 0.88 (95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.86-0.89), and 196 (36 %) lesions were under-covered. The highest mean CCI (0.95; 95 %CI, 0.93-0.97) was in non-spine bone lesions (n = 116), while the lowest mean CCI (0.71; 95 % CI, 0.69-0.73) was in spine lesions (n = 104). On multivariable analysis, under-coverage did not predict for worse LR (HR 0.48, p = 0.37) or PFS (HR 1.24, p = 0.38). Largest lesion diameter, colorectal and 'other' (non-prostate, breast, or lung) primary predicted for worse LR. Largest lesion diameter, synchronous tumor treatment, short disease free interval, state of oligoprogression, initiation or change in systemic treatment, and a high PTV Dmax were significantly associated with PFS. PTV under-coverage was not associated with worse LR or PFS in this large, population-based phase II trial. Combined with low toxicity rates, this study supports the practice of prioritizing OAR constraints during oligometastatic SABR planning.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for oligometastases may improve survival, however concerns about safety remain. To mitigate risk of toxicity, target coverage was sacrificed to prioritize organs-at-risk (OARs) during SABR planning in the population-based SABR-5 trial. This study evaluated the effect of this practice on dosimetry, local recurrence (LR), and progression-free survival (PFS).
METHODS
This single-arm phase II trial included patients with up to 5 oligometastases between November 2016 and July 2020. Theprotocol-specified planning objective was to cover 95 % of the planning target volume (PTV) with 100 % of the prescribed dose, however PTV coverage was reduced as needed to meet OAR constraints. This trade-off was measured using the coverage compromise index (CCI), computed as minimum dose received by the hottest 99 % of the PTV (D99) divided by the prescription dose. Under-coverage was defined as CCI < 0.90. The potential association between CCI and outcomes was evaluated.
RESULTS
549 lesions from 381 patients were assessed. Mean CCI was 0.88 (95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.86-0.89), and 196 (36 %) lesions were under-covered. The highest mean CCI (0.95; 95 %CI, 0.93-0.97) was in non-spine bone lesions (n = 116), while the lowest mean CCI (0.71; 95 % CI, 0.69-0.73) was in spine lesions (n = 104). On multivariable analysis, under-coverage did not predict for worse LR (HR 0.48, p = 0.37) or PFS (HR 1.24, p = 0.38). Largest lesion diameter, colorectal and 'other' (non-prostate, breast, or lung) primary predicted for worse LR. Largest lesion diameter, synchronous tumor treatment, short disease free interval, state of oligoprogression, initiation or change in systemic treatment, and a high PTV Dmax were significantly associated with PFS.
CONCLUSION
PTV under-coverage was not associated with worse LR or PFS in this large, population-based phase II trial. Combined with low toxicity rates, this study supports the practice of prioritizing OAR constraints during oligometastatic SABR planning.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36822355
pii: S0167-8140(23)00114-7
doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109576
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Clinical Trial, Phase II Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

109576

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Reno Eufemon Cereno (R)

University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; British Columbia Cancer, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada.

Benjamin Mou (B)

University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; British Columbia Cancer, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada.

Sarah Baker (S)

University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; British Columbia Cancer, Surrey, British Columbia, Canada.

Nick Chng (N)

British Columbia Cancer, Prince George, British Columbia, Canada.

Gregory Arbour (G)

University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada.

Alanah Bergman (A)

University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; British Columbia Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Mitchell Liu (M)

University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; British Columbia Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Devin Schellenberg (D)

University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; British Columbia Cancer, Surrey, British Columbia, Canada.

Quinn Matthews (Q)

British Columbia Cancer, Prince George, British Columbia, Canada.

Vicky Huang (V)

British Columbia Cancer, Surrey, British Columbia, Canada.

Ante Mestrovic (A)

British Columbia Cancer, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.

Derek Hyde (D)

British Columbia Cancer, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada.

Abraham Alexander (A)

University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; British Columbia Cancer, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.

Hannah Carolan (H)

University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; British Columbia Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Fred Hsu (F)

University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; British Columbia Cancer, Abbotsford, British Columbia, Canada.

Stacy Miller (S)

University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; British Columbia Cancer, Prince George, British Columbia, Canada.

Siavash Atrchian (S)

University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; British Columbia Cancer, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada.

Elisa Chan (E)

University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; British Columbia Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Clement Ho (C)

University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; British Columbia Cancer, Surrey, British Columbia, Canada.

Islam Mohamed (I)

University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; British Columbia Cancer, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada.

Angela Lin (A)

University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; British Columbia Cancer, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada.

Tanya Berrang (T)

University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; British Columbia Cancer, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.

Andrew Bang (A)

University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; British Columbia Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Will Jiang (W)

University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; British Columbia Cancer, Prince George, British Columbia, Canada.

Chad Lund (C)

University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; British Columbia Cancer, Surrey, British Columbia, Canada.

Howard Pai (H)

University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; British Columbia Cancer, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.

Boris Valev (B)

University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; British Columbia Cancer, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.

Shilo Lefresne (S)

University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; British Columbia Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Scott Tyldesley (S)

University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; British Columbia Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Robert A Olson (RA)

University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada; British Columbia Cancer, Prince George, British Columbia, Canada. Electronic address: Rolson2@bccancer.bc.ca.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH