Variability of estimated glomerular filtration rate and 99m Tc-DTPA glomerular filtration rate: implications for a single time-point sampling regime.
Journal
Nuclear medicine communications
ISSN: 1473-5628
Titre abrégé: Nucl Med Commun
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8201017
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 May 2023
01 May 2023
Historique:
medline:
6
4
2023
pubmed:
25
2
2023
entrez:
24
2
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This work aimed to determine the implications of the variability in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) for the prediction of measured GFR (mGFR) for selection of sampling time-point in single-sample 99m Tc-diethylene-triamine-pentaacetate (DTPA) mGFR. Patient studies were used to compare eGFR and mGFR ( n = 282). The eGFR was calculated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration 2009 equation, from serum creatinine values measured in the laboratory ( n = 27) or using a point-of-care testing device ( n = 255). The mGFR was taken as the true value, and the root mean square error (RMS err ) in eGFR was calculated. Receiver operator characteristic curves were generated comparing the sensitivity and specificity of eGFR for the prediction of mGFR within the British Nuclear Medicine Society (BNMS) 2018 guideline ranges. The overall eGFR RMS err was 19.3 mL/min/1.73 m 2 . Use of eGFR to predict mGFR in the ranges specified in the BNMS 2018 guidelines (25-50; 50-70; 70-100; and >100) achieved the following specificity and sensitivity for each individual range (97%, 71%; 92%, 47%; 81%, 48%; and 74%, 90%). For the middle ranges (50-70 and 70-100) the sensitivity is very low, less than 50%; more studies are classified incorrectly on the basis of eGFR in these ranges than correctly. This work shows that serum creatinine eGFR is not sufficiently accurate to predict the optimum single-sample time-point for 99m Tc-DTPA mGFR prior to measurement. It is the recommendation of this study that a single sampling time-point should be chosen for studies eGFR > 40 ml/min/1.73 m 2 as opposed to the use of eGFR to determine the sampling time-point.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
This work aimed to determine the implications of the variability in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) for the prediction of measured GFR (mGFR) for selection of sampling time-point in single-sample 99m Tc-diethylene-triamine-pentaacetate (DTPA) mGFR.
METHODS
METHODS
Patient studies were used to compare eGFR and mGFR ( n = 282). The eGFR was calculated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration 2009 equation, from serum creatinine values measured in the laboratory ( n = 27) or using a point-of-care testing device ( n = 255). The mGFR was taken as the true value, and the root mean square error (RMS err ) in eGFR was calculated. Receiver operator characteristic curves were generated comparing the sensitivity and specificity of eGFR for the prediction of mGFR within the British Nuclear Medicine Society (BNMS) 2018 guideline ranges.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The overall eGFR RMS err was 19.3 mL/min/1.73 m 2 . Use of eGFR to predict mGFR in the ranges specified in the BNMS 2018 guidelines (25-50; 50-70; 70-100; and >100) achieved the following specificity and sensitivity for each individual range (97%, 71%; 92%, 47%; 81%, 48%; and 74%, 90%). For the middle ranges (50-70 and 70-100) the sensitivity is very low, less than 50%; more studies are classified incorrectly on the basis of eGFR in these ranges than correctly.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
This work shows that serum creatinine eGFR is not sufficiently accurate to predict the optimum single-sample time-point for 99m Tc-DTPA mGFR prior to measurement. It is the recommendation of this study that a single sampling time-point should be chosen for studies eGFR > 40 ml/min/1.73 m 2 as opposed to the use of eGFR to determine the sampling time-point.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36826407
doi: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000001674
pii: 00006231-202305000-00003
pmc: PMC10069751
doi:
Substances chimiques
Technetium Tc 99m Pentetate
VW78417PU1
Creatinine
AYI8EX34EU
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
351-357Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
Références
Burniston M. Clinical guideline for the measurement of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) using plasma sampling. https://www.bnms.org.uk/page/BNMSClinicalGuidelines . [Accessed 18 January 2023].
Fleming JS, Zivanovic MA, Blake GM, Burniston M, Cosgriff PS; British Nuclear Medicine Society. Guidelines for the measurement of glomerular filtration rate using plasma sampling. Nucl Med Commun 2004; 25:759–769.
Fleming JS, Persaud L, Zivanovic MA. A general equation for estimating glomerular filtration rate from a single plasma sample. Nucl Med Commun 2005; 26:743–748.
Jacobsson L. A method for the calculation of renal clearance based on a single plasma sample. Clin Physiol 1983; 3:297–305.
McMeekin H, Wickham F, Barnfield M, Burniston M. A systematic review of single-sample glomerular filtration rate measurement techniques and demonstration of equal accuracy to slope-intercept methods. Nucl Med Commun 2016; 37:743–755.
Porter CA, Bradley KM, McGowan DR. A comparison of four-sample slope–intercept and single-sample 51 Cr-EDTA glomerular filtration rate measurements. Nucl Med Commun 2018; 39:465–468.
McMeekin H, Townrow S, Barnfield M, Bradley A, Fongenie B, McGowan DR, et al. Tailoring the sampling time of single-sample GFR measurement according to expected renal function: a multisite audit. EJNMMI Phys 2022; 9:73.
Hutton LG, Porter CA, Morgan AJ, Bradley KM, McGowan DR. An investigation into the accuracy of using serum creatinine estimated glomerular filtration rate to predict measured glomerular filtration rate. Nucl Med Commun 2019; 40:349–352.
Corbett M, Duarte A, Llewellyn A, Altunkaya J, Harden M, Harris M, et al. ‘Point-of-care creatinine tests to assess kidney function for outpatients requiring contrast-enhanced CT imaging: systematic reviews and economic evaluation’. Health Technol Assess 2020; 24:1–248.
Levey AS, Stevens LA, Schmid CH, Zhang YL, Castro AF 3rd, Feldman HI, et al. A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate., Ann Intern Med 2009; 150:604–612. Erratum in: Ann. Intern. Med. 2011;155(6):408.
Gansevoort RT, Anders H, Cozzolino M, Fliser D, Fouque D, Ortiz A, et al. What should European nephrology do with the new CKD-EPI equation?. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2022; 38:1–6.
McMeekin H, Wickham F, Fongenie B, Burniston M. Accuracy of next-day single-sample measurement for low glomerular filtration rate and comparison with same-day slope-intercept glomerular filtration rate. Nucl Med Commun 2021; 42:169–172.