Machine Learning to Identify Patients at Risk of Developing New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation after Coronary Artery Bypass.

artificial intelligence atrial fibrillation machine learning postoperative CABG

Journal

Journal of cardiovascular development and disease
ISSN: 2308-3425
Titre abrégé: J Cardiovasc Dev Dis
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101651414

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
15 Feb 2023
Historique:
received: 04 12 2022
revised: 18 01 2023
accepted: 10 02 2023
entrez: 24 2 2023
pubmed: 25 2 2023
medline: 25 2 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

This study aims to get an effective machine learning (ML) prediction model of new-onset postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) following coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and to highlight the most relevant clinical factors. Four ML algorithms were employed to analyze 394 patients undergoing CABG, and their performances were compared: Multivariate Adaptive Regression Spline, Neural Network, Random Forest, and Support Vector Machine. Each algorithm was applied to the training data set to choose the most important features and to build a predictive model. The better performance for each model was obtained by a hyperparameters search, and the Receiver Operating Characteristic Area Under the Curve metric was selected to choose the best model. The best instances of each model were fed with the test data set, and some metrics were generated to assess the performance of the models on the unseen data set. A traditional logistic regression was also performed to be compared with the machine learning models. Random Forest model showed the best performance, and the top five predictive features included age, preoperative creatinine values, time of aortic cross-clamping, body surface area, and Logistic Euro-Score. The use of ML for clinical predictions requires an accurate evaluation of the models and their hyperparameters. Random Forest outperformed all other models in the clinical prediction of POAF following CABG.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
This study aims to get an effective machine learning (ML) prediction model of new-onset postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) following coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and to highlight the most relevant clinical factors.
METHODS METHODS
Four ML algorithms were employed to analyze 394 patients undergoing CABG, and their performances were compared: Multivariate Adaptive Regression Spline, Neural Network, Random Forest, and Support Vector Machine. Each algorithm was applied to the training data set to choose the most important features and to build a predictive model. The better performance for each model was obtained by a hyperparameters search, and the Receiver Operating Characteristic Area Under the Curve metric was selected to choose the best model. The best instances of each model were fed with the test data set, and some metrics were generated to assess the performance of the models on the unseen data set. A traditional logistic regression was also performed to be compared with the machine learning models.
RESULTS RESULTS
Random Forest model showed the best performance, and the top five predictive features included age, preoperative creatinine values, time of aortic cross-clamping, body surface area, and Logistic Euro-Score.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
The use of ML for clinical predictions requires an accurate evaluation of the models and their hyperparameters. Random Forest outperformed all other models in the clinical prediction of POAF following CABG.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36826578
pii: jcdd10020082
doi: 10.3390/jcdd10020082
pmc: PMC9962068
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Références

Heart. 2012 May;98(9):683-90
pubmed: 22397945
Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Jun 16;6:213-20
pubmed: 24966695
Circulation. 1994 Apr;89(4):1665-80
pubmed: 8149534
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2014 Jun;27(3):344-52
pubmed: 24633361
Br Heart J. 1972 May;34(5):520-5
pubmed: 5031645
Innovations (Phila). 2021 Mar-Apr;16(2):181-187
pubmed: 33410714
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011 Feb;141(2):559-70
pubmed: 20434173
J Pers Med. 2021 Jun 25;11(7):
pubmed: 34202096
Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2008 Apr 01;8(2):94-101
pubmed: 18379654
Heart Rhythm. 2009 Dec;6(12 Suppl):S41-5
pubmed: 19959142
PLoS One. 2019 Nov 1;14(11):e0224582
pubmed: 31675367
Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020;36(1):6-13
pubmed: 32435088
Europace. 2010 Jun;12(6):835-41
pubmed: 20223787
Circulation. 2007 Sep 11;116(11 Suppl):I213-9
pubmed: 17846306
JAMA. 2004 Apr 14;291(14):1720-9
pubmed: 15082699
Ann Surg. 1997 Oct;226(4):501-11; discussion 511-3
pubmed: 9351718
Circulation. 2015 Nov 17;132(20):1920-30
pubmed: 26572668
Value Health. 2007 Mar-Apr;10(2):137-43
pubmed: 17391422
J Atr Fibrillation. 2013 Apr 06;5(6):781
pubmed: 28496829
Clin Res Cardiol. 2019 Jul;108(7):730-740
pubmed: 30737531
Europace. 2019 Oct 1;21(10):1468-1475
pubmed: 31131389
Chest. 2007 Mar;131(3):833-839
pubmed: 17356100
Circulation. 1996 Aug 1;94(3):390-7
pubmed: 8759081
Front Physiol. 2020 Feb 21;11:68
pubmed: 32153419
Ann Card Anaesth. 2014 Jul-Sep;17(3):182-7
pubmed: 24994728
J Neurol. 2009 Jun;256(6):954-63
pubmed: 19252783
Int J Gen Med. 2022 Jan 26;15:937-948
pubmed: 35115819
Ann Thorac Surg. 1993 Oct;56(4):814-823; discussion 823-4
pubmed: 8215657
Europace. 2020 May 1;22(5):684-694
pubmed: 32011689
Eur Heart J. 2021 Oct 21;42(40):4194
pubmed: 34520521
Environ Int. 2020 Sep;142:105827
pubmed: 32593834
Curr Cardiol Rev. 2012 Nov;8(4):327-46
pubmed: 22920482
Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 Aug;98(2):527-33; discussion 533
pubmed: 25087786
Europace. 2012 Nov;14 Suppl 5:v10-v16
pubmed: 23104905
Chest. 2004 Aug;126(2):476-86
pubmed: 15302734
Europace. 2013 Feb;15(2):170-82
pubmed: 22782971
Heart. 2018 Jun;104(12):985-992
pubmed: 29326112
Circulation. 2019 Mar 5;139(10):e56-e528
pubmed: 30700139
Circulation. 1998 Aug 4;98(5):429-34
pubmed: 9714093
JAMA. 2004 Nov 24;292(20):2471-7
pubmed: 15562125
Circulation. 2002 Mar 5;105(9):1077-81
pubmed: 11877358
Comput Biol Med. 2021 Sep;136:104716
pubmed: 34364262
Heart. 2004 Feb;90(2):129-33
pubmed: 14729772
Circulation. 2005 Nov 22;112(21):3247-55
pubmed: 16286585
Lancet. 2015 Jul 11;386(9989):154-62
pubmed: 25960110
Obes Res. 2002 Aug;10(8):767-73
pubmed: 12181385
Am J Cardiol. 2002 Dec 15;90(12):1284-9
pubmed: 12480035
JAMA. 2001 May 9;285(18):2370-5
pubmed: 11343485
Am Heart J. 2010 Jun;159(6):1102-7
pubmed: 20569726
Ann Thorac Surg. 2018 Jan;105(1):15-23
pubmed: 29233331
Europace. 2021 Mar 4;23(23 Suppl 1):i161-i168
pubmed: 33751085
Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Jan;101(1):24-32
pubmed: 26616408
Circulation. 2014 Feb 25;129(8):837-47
pubmed: 24345399
Heart. 2007 Jan;93(1):82-8
pubmed: 16905626
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Sep;148(3):e153-93
pubmed: 25129609
Eur Heart J. 2010 Oct;31(19):2369-429
pubmed: 20802247
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Feb 26;51(8):793-801
pubmed: 18294562
Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2016 Apr;26(3):268-77
pubmed: 26296538
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2011 Jan;22(1):16-22
pubmed: 20807271
Eur Respir J. 2020 Aug 20;56(2):
pubmed: 32616597
Front Physiol. 2021 Oct 28;12:752317
pubmed: 34777014
Europace. 2008 Apr;10(4):403-11
pubmed: 18326853

Auteurs

Orlando Parise (O)

Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University Medical Centre, Universiteitssingel 50, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Department of Cardiac Surgery, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium.

Gianmarco Parise (G)

Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University Medical Centre, Universiteitssingel 50, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Akshayaa Vaidyanathan (A)

Radiomics, 4000 Liège, Belgium.

Mariaelena Occhipinti (M)

Radiomics, 4000 Liège, Belgium.

Ali Gharaviri (A)

Institute of Computational Science, Università della Svizzera Italiana, 6900 Lugano, Switzerland.

Cecilia Tetta (C)

Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University Medical Centre, Universiteitssingel 50, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Elham Bidar (E)

Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University Medical Centre, Universiteitssingel 50, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Bart Maesen (B)

Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University Medical Centre, Universiteitssingel 50, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Jos G Maessen (JG)

Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University Medical Centre, Universiteitssingel 50, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Mark La Meir (M)

Department of Cardiac Surgery, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium.

Sandro Gelsomino (S)

Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University Medical Centre, Universiteitssingel 50, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Department of Cardiac Surgery, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium.

Classifications MeSH