Contraceptive Access and Use Among Undergraduate and Graduate Students During COVID-19: Online Survey Study.

COVID-19 LARC college contraception disparities health disparity health messaging health promotion health resource healthcare access risk factor sexual health social media telehealth

Journal

JMIR formative research
ISSN: 2561-326X
Titre abrégé: JMIR Form Res
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101726394

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
14 Mar 2023
Historique:
received: 04 04 2022
accepted: 20 02 2023
revised: 16 02 2023
pubmed: 25 2 2023
medline: 25 2 2023
entrez: 24 2 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The COVID-19 pandemic led to widespread college campus closures in the months of March to June 2020, endangering students' access to on-campus health resources, including reproductive health services. To assess contraceptive access and use among undergraduate and graduate students in North Carolina during the COVID-19 pandemic. We conducted a cross-sectional web-based survey of undergraduate and graduate students enrolled at degree-granting institutions in North Carolina. Participants were recruited using targeted Instagram advertisements. The survey queried several aspects of participants' sexual behavior, including sex drive, level of sexual experience, number of sexual partners, digital sexual experience, dating patterns, and types of contraception used. Participants were asked to compare many of these behaviors before and after the pandemic. The survey also assessed several sociodemographic factors that we hypothesized would be associated with contraceptive use based on prior data, including educational background, sexual orientation and gender minority status (ie, lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer), health insurance status, race, ethnicity, degree of sensation seeking, religiosity, and desire to become pregnant. Over 10 days, 2035 Instagram users began our survey, of whom 1002 met eligibility criteria. Of these 1002 eligible participants, 934 completed the survey, for a 93% completion rate. Our respondents were mostly female (665/934, 71%), cisgender (877/934, 94%), heterosexual (592/934, 64%), white (695/934 75%), not Hispanic (835/934, 89%), and enrolled at a 4-year college (618/934, 66%). Over 95% (895/934) of respondents reported that they maintained access to their preferred contraception during the COVID-19 pandemic. In a multivariable analysis, participants who were enrolled in a 4-year college or graduate program were less likely to lose contraceptive access when compared to participants enrolled in a 2-year college (risk ratio [RR] 0.34, 95% CI 0.16-0.71); in addition, when compared to cisgender participants, nonbinary and transgender participants were more likely to lose contraceptive access (RR 2.43, 95% CI 1.01-5.87). Respondents reported that they were more interested in using telehealth to access contraception during the pandemic. The contraceptive methods most commonly used by our participants were, in order, condoms (331/934, 35.4%), oral contraception (303/934, 32.4%), and long-acting reversible contraception (LARC; 221/934, 23.7%). The rate of LARC use among our participants was higher than the national average for this age group (14%). Emergency contraception was uncommonly used (25/934, 2.7%). Undergraduate and graduate students in North Carolina overwhelmingly reported that they maintained access to their preferred contraceptive methods during the COVID-19 pandemic and through changing patterns of health care access, including telehealth. Gender nonbinary and transgender students and 2-year college students may have been at greater risk of losing access to contraception during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The COVID-19 pandemic led to widespread college campus closures in the months of March to June 2020, endangering students' access to on-campus health resources, including reproductive health services.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
To assess contraceptive access and use among undergraduate and graduate students in North Carolina during the COVID-19 pandemic.
METHODS METHODS
We conducted a cross-sectional web-based survey of undergraduate and graduate students enrolled at degree-granting institutions in North Carolina. Participants were recruited using targeted Instagram advertisements. The survey queried several aspects of participants' sexual behavior, including sex drive, level of sexual experience, number of sexual partners, digital sexual experience, dating patterns, and types of contraception used. Participants were asked to compare many of these behaviors before and after the pandemic. The survey also assessed several sociodemographic factors that we hypothesized would be associated with contraceptive use based on prior data, including educational background, sexual orientation and gender minority status (ie, lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer), health insurance status, race, ethnicity, degree of sensation seeking, religiosity, and desire to become pregnant.
RESULTS RESULTS
Over 10 days, 2035 Instagram users began our survey, of whom 1002 met eligibility criteria. Of these 1002 eligible participants, 934 completed the survey, for a 93% completion rate. Our respondents were mostly female (665/934, 71%), cisgender (877/934, 94%), heterosexual (592/934, 64%), white (695/934 75%), not Hispanic (835/934, 89%), and enrolled at a 4-year college (618/934, 66%). Over 95% (895/934) of respondents reported that they maintained access to their preferred contraception during the COVID-19 pandemic. In a multivariable analysis, participants who were enrolled in a 4-year college or graduate program were less likely to lose contraceptive access when compared to participants enrolled in a 2-year college (risk ratio [RR] 0.34, 95% CI 0.16-0.71); in addition, when compared to cisgender participants, nonbinary and transgender participants were more likely to lose contraceptive access (RR 2.43, 95% CI 1.01-5.87). Respondents reported that they were more interested in using telehealth to access contraception during the pandemic. The contraceptive methods most commonly used by our participants were, in order, condoms (331/934, 35.4%), oral contraception (303/934, 32.4%), and long-acting reversible contraception (LARC; 221/934, 23.7%). The rate of LARC use among our participants was higher than the national average for this age group (14%). Emergency contraception was uncommonly used (25/934, 2.7%).
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Undergraduate and graduate students in North Carolina overwhelmingly reported that they maintained access to their preferred contraceptive methods during the COVID-19 pandemic and through changing patterns of health care access, including telehealth. Gender nonbinary and transgender students and 2-year college students may have been at greater risk of losing access to contraception during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36827491
pii: v7i1e38491
doi: 10.2196/38491
pmc: PMC10018798
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e38491

Subventions

Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : K12 HD103083
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : UL1 TR002553
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

©Emily Chen, Adam Hollowell, Tracy Truong, Keisha Bentley-Edwards, Evan Myers, Alaattin Erkanli, Lauren Holt, Jonas J Swartz. Originally published in JMIR Formative Research (https://formative.jmir.org), 14.03.2023.

Références

J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2010 Mar;19(3):589-95
pubmed: 20136552
Contraception. 2003 Jun;67(6):449-56
pubmed: 12814813
Contraception. 2010 Oct;82(4):324-30
pubmed: 20851225
Demography. 2017 Jun;54(3):887-909
pubmed: 28466434
Am Fam Physician. 2015 May 1;91(9):625-33
pubmed: 25955737
Ann Emerg Med. 2006 Feb;47(2):154-7
pubmed: 16435418
J Am Coll Health. 2011;59(8):744-50
pubmed: 21950256
Matern Child Health J. 2018 Nov;22(11):1639-1646
pubmed: 29936659
Contraception. 2021 Dec;104(6):593-599
pubmed: 34400152
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Feb;222(2):134-143
pubmed: 31394072
Contraception. 2021 Mar;103(3):157-162
pubmed: 33212033
Am J Epidemiol. 2004 Apr 1;159(7):702-6
pubmed: 15033648
J Am Coll Health. 2018 Jul;66(5):360-368
pubmed: 29405858
JAMA. 2020 May 19;323(19):1891-1892
pubmed: 32293639
Contraception. 2016 Jun;93(6):556-64
pubmed: 26879627
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Sep 11;69(36):1250-1257
pubmed: 32915166
Womens Health Issues. 2019 Mar - Apr;29(2):161-169
pubmed: 30797632
J Am Coll Health. 2010 Jan-Feb;58(4):337-46
pubmed: 20159757

Auteurs

Emily Chen (E)

Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States.

Adam Hollowell (A)

Samuel Dubois Cook Center on Social Equity, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.

Tracy Truong (T)

Department of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.

Keisha Bentley-Edwards (K)

Department of General Internal Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States.

Evan Myers (E)

Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States.

Alaattin Erkanli (A)

Department of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.

Lauren Holt (L)

School of Nursing, Duke University School of Nursing, Durham, NC, United States.

Jonas J Swartz (JJ)

Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States.

Classifications MeSH