Unilaterally Applied Resistance to Swing Leg Shows a Different Adaptation Pattern Compared to Split-Belt Treadmill in Patients with Stroke.
motor adaptation
perturbation training
post-stroke hemiparesis
Journal
Brain sciences
ISSN: 2076-3425
Titre abrégé: Brain Sci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101598646
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 Feb 2023
03 Feb 2023
Historique:
received:
04
01
2023
revised:
25
01
2023
accepted:
28
01
2023
entrez:
25
2
2023
pubmed:
26
2
2023
medline:
26
2
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Persons with chronic stroke (PwCS) have a decreased ability to ambulate and walk independently. We aimed to investigate the differences between the motor adaptation process for two different perturbation methods: split-belt treadmill walking and unilaterally applied resistance to the swing leg during walking. Twenty-two PwCS undergo split-belt treadmill walking and unilaterally applied resistance to the swing leg during walking, each one week apart. The test included three phases: the baseline period, the early-adaptation period and the late-adaptation period, as well as the early-de-adaptation period and the late-de-adaptation period. The average step length, swing duration, double-limb support duration, and coefficient of variance (CV) of these parameters were measured. During the split-belt treadmill walking, PwCS showed an adaptation of double-limb support duration symmetry (
Identifiants
pubmed: 36831806
pii: brainsci13020264
doi: 10.3390/brainsci13020264
pmc: PMC9954706
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
J Neurophysiol. 2013 Apr;109(8):2216-27
pubmed: 23365187
Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2015 Nov;26(4):703-13
pubmed: 26522907
Neuron. 2009 Nov 25;64(4):575-89
pubmed: 19945398
J Neurosci. 1994 May;14(5 Pt 2):3208-24
pubmed: 8182467
J Neurophysiol. 2010 Dec;104(6):3053-63
pubmed: 20861427
J Neurophysiol. 1995 Jan;73(1):347-60
pubmed: 7714577
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009 Sep;23(7):735-44
pubmed: 19307434
Hum Mov Sci. 2007 Aug;26(4):555-89
pubmed: 17618701
Circulation. 2013 Jan 1;127(1):e6-e245
pubmed: 23239837
Neurology. 1983 Jun;33(6):766-72
pubmed: 6682520
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2014 Mar-Apr;28(3):230-40
pubmed: 24243917
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Feb;89(2):304-10
pubmed: 18226655
Nat Neurosci. 1999 Nov;2(11):1026-31
pubmed: 10526344
Clin Rehabil. 2012 Aug;26(8):686-95
pubmed: 22275464
Stroke. 1995 Jun;26(6):982-9
pubmed: 7762050
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2013 Jan;27(1):24-34
pubmed: 22367915
Clin Neurophysiol. 2014 May;125(5):1012-20
pubmed: 24286858
Curr Opin Neurol. 2008 Dec;21(6):628-33
pubmed: 18989103
Brain. 2007 Jul;130(Pt 7):1861-72
pubmed: 17405765
Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 May 04;10:203
pubmed: 27199721
J Clin Neurosci. 2020 Aug;78:301-306
pubmed: 32389546
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010 Mar-Apr;24(3):213-24
pubmed: 19822722
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2003 Oct;82(10):778-86; quiz 787-9, 823
pubmed: 14508410
Exp Brain Res. 2006 Mar;169(4):482-95
pubmed: 16328304
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 Jan;88(1):43-9
pubmed: 17207674
CNS Neurosci Ther. 2023 Jan 4;:
pubmed: 36601664
Hum Mov Sci. 2015 Aug;42:212-24
pubmed: 26066783
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2015 Jun;29(5):416-23
pubmed: 25288581
Brain. 1996 Aug;119 ( Pt 4):1199-211
pubmed: 8813283
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2013 Jun;27(5):460-8
pubmed: 23392918
J Rehabil Med. 2003 Nov;35(6):259-64
pubmed: 14664315
Int J Stroke. 2014 Jan;9(1):6-18
pubmed: 24350870
J Neurol. 2016 Mar;263(3):477-84
pubmed: 26725090
J Neurophysiol. 2010 Dec;104(6):3600-11
pubmed: 20943942
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2009 May-Jun;18(3):198-202
pubmed: 19426890
J Neurophysiol. 2005 Oct;94(4):2403-15
pubmed: 15958603
Clin Rehabil. 2019 Jun;33(6):964-979
pubmed: 30897960
J Neurophysiol. 1999 Nov;82(5):2108-19
pubmed: 10561391
Gait Posture. 2010 Mar;31(3):311-6
pubmed: 20006505
J Rehabil Res Dev. 1995 Feb;32(1):25-31
pubmed: 7760264
J Neurophysiol. 2007 Jul;98(1):54-62
pubmed: 17507504
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1997 Mar-Apr;76(2):128-33
pubmed: 9129519
J Appl Biomech. 2014 Feb;30(1):31-6
pubmed: 23677889