Multi-Frequency Electrocochleography and Electrode Scan to Identify Electrode Insertion Trauma during Cochlear Implantation.
cochlear implants
cochlear microphonics
electrocochleography
electrode scan
Journal
Brain sciences
ISSN: 2076-3425
Titre abrégé: Brain Sci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101598646
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 Feb 2023
15 Feb 2023
Historique:
received:
23
12
2022
revised:
27
01
2023
accepted:
10
02
2023
entrez:
25
2
2023
pubmed:
26
2
2023
medline:
26
2
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Intraoperative electrocochleography (ECOG) is performed using a single low-frequency acoustic stimulus (e.g., 500 Hz) to monitor cochlear microphonics (CM) during cochlear implant (CI) electrode insertion. A decrease in CM amplitude is commonly associated with cochlear trauma and is used to guide electrode placement. However, advancement of the recording electrode beyond the sites of CM generation can also lead to a decrease in CM amplitude and is sometimes interpreted as cochlear trauma, resulting in unnecessary electrode manipulation and increased risk of cochlear trauma during CI electrode placement. In the present study, multi-frequency ECOG was used to monitor CM during CI electrode placement. The intraoperative CM tracings were compared with electrode scan measurements, where CM was measured for each of the intracochlear electrodes. Comparison between the peak CM amplitude measured during electrode placement and electrode scan measurements was used to differentiate between different mechanisms for decrease in CM amplitude during CI electrode insertion. Analysis of the data shows that both multi-frequency electrocochleography and electrode scan could potentially be used to differentiate between different mechanisms for decreasing CM amplitude and providing appropriate feedback to the surgeon during CI electrode placement.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36831873
pii: brainsci13020330
doi: 10.3390/brainsci13020330
pmc: PMC9954676
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Otol Neurotol. 2017 Dec;38(10):1415-1420
pubmed: 28953607
Otol Neurotol. 2018 Sep;39(8):e654-e659
pubmed: 30113557
Otol Neurotol. 2017 Jul;38(6):e107-e113
pubmed: 28498269
Otol Neurotol. 2012 Dec;33(9):1507-15
pubmed: 23047261
Otol Neurotol. 2012 Apr;33(3):348-54
pubmed: 22377649
Ear Hear. 2017 May/Jun;38(3):e161-e167
pubmed: 27879487
J Int Adv Otol. 2018 Dec;14(3):401-403
pubmed: 30644381
PLoS One. 2022 Apr 22;17(4):e0266077
pubmed: 35452461
Otol Neurotol. 2022 Sep 1;43(8):e880-e887
pubmed: 35970166
J Acoust Soc Am. 2020 Mar;147(3):2049
pubmed: 32237816
Otol Neurotol. 2019 Jun;40(5):e503-e510
pubmed: 31083085
Otol Neurotol. 2020 Oct;41(9):1222-1229
pubmed: 32925842
Front Neurosci. 2017 Mar 23;11:141
pubmed: 28386212
Audiol Neurootol. 2017;22(3):180-189
pubmed: 29084395
Ear Hear. 2019 May/Jun;40(3):577-591
pubmed: 30169463
Otol Neurotol. 2022 Aug 1;43(7):789-796
pubmed: 35861647
Otol Neurotol. 2022 Jan 1;43(1):e72-e78
pubmed: 34739427
Otol Neurotol. 2016 Apr;37(4):332-8
pubmed: 26859542
Front Neurosci. 2017 May 29;11:291
pubmed: 28611574
Trends Hear. 2021 Jan-Dec;25:2331216521990594
pubmed: 33710919
Laryngoscope. 2005 May;115(5):796-802
pubmed: 15867642
Front Neurosci. 2018 Jan 26;12:18
pubmed: 29434534
Otol Neurotol. 2019 Dec;40(10):1287-1291
pubmed: 31644474
Ear Hear. 2019 Jul/Aug;40(4):833-848
pubmed: 30335669
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2007 Aug;50(4):835-43
pubmed: 17675589