The Effects of Orthoptic Therapy on the Surgical Outcome in Children with Intermittent Exotropia: Randomised Controlled Clinical Trial.

fusional convergence amplitude intermittent exotropia orthoptic therapy randomised controlled trial suboptimal surgical outcome

Journal

Journal of clinical medicine
ISSN: 2077-0383
Titre abrégé: J Clin Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101606588

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 Feb 2023
Historique:
received: 23 11 2022
revised: 04 01 2023
accepted: 03 02 2023
entrez: 25 2 2023
pubmed: 26 2 2023
medline: 26 2 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

To assess the clinical effectiveness of orthoptic therapy in the postoperative stabilisation and rehabilitation of binocular function in children with intermittent exotropia (IXT) after surgery. This was a prospective, parallel, randomised controlled trial. A total of 136 IXT patients (aged from 7 to 17 years) who had been successfully corrected at 1 month after surgery were enrolled in this study, and 117 patients (58 controls) completed the 12-month follow-up visit. The primary outcome was established as the proportion of patients with suboptimal surgical outcomes, which were defined as: (1) exodeviation ≥10 prism diopters (PD) at distance or near using the simultaneous prism and cover test (SPCT), or (2) constant esotropia ≥6 PD at distance or near using SPCT, or (3) loss of 2 or more octaves of stereopsis from baseline. The secondary outcomes were the exodeviation at distance and near using the prism and alternate cover test (PACT), stereopsis, fusional exotropia control and convergence amplitude. The cumulative probability of suboptimal surgical outcome by 12 months was 20.5% (14/68) in the orthoptic therapy group and 42.6% (29/68) in the control group. There was a significant difference between these two groups (χ Early postoperative orthoptic therapy can effectively improve the surgical outcome as well as stereopsis and fusional amplitude.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
To assess the clinical effectiveness of orthoptic therapy in the postoperative stabilisation and rehabilitation of binocular function in children with intermittent exotropia (IXT) after surgery.
METHODS METHODS
This was a prospective, parallel, randomised controlled trial. A total of 136 IXT patients (aged from 7 to 17 years) who had been successfully corrected at 1 month after surgery were enrolled in this study, and 117 patients (58 controls) completed the 12-month follow-up visit. The primary outcome was established as the proportion of patients with suboptimal surgical outcomes, which were defined as: (1) exodeviation ≥10 prism diopters (PD) at distance or near using the simultaneous prism and cover test (SPCT), or (2) constant esotropia ≥6 PD at distance or near using SPCT, or (3) loss of 2 or more octaves of stereopsis from baseline. The secondary outcomes were the exodeviation at distance and near using the prism and alternate cover test (PACT), stereopsis, fusional exotropia control and convergence amplitude.
RESULTS RESULTS
The cumulative probability of suboptimal surgical outcome by 12 months was 20.5% (14/68) in the orthoptic therapy group and 42.6% (29/68) in the control group. There was a significant difference between these two groups (χ
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Early postoperative orthoptic therapy can effectively improve the surgical outcome as well as stereopsis and fusional amplitude.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36835820
pii: jcm12041283
doi: 10.3390/jcm12041283
pmc: PMC9964836
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Subventions

Organisme : Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China
ID : LY19H120004
Organisme : National Natural Science Foundation of China grant NSFC
ID : 82070995

Références

Am J Ophthalmol. 2006 Oct;142(4):708-9; author reply 709
pubmed: 17011885
Int J Ophthalmol. 2017 Jul 18;10(7):1120-1125
pubmed: 28730116
Am J Ophthalmol. 2009 Sep;148(3):459-65
pubmed: 19541284
Ophthalmology. 2005 Jan;112(1):104-8
pubmed: 15629828
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010 Nov;51(11):5646-56
pubmed: 20538996
Int Ophthalmol. 1983 Jan;6(1):19-26
pubmed: 6826288
J Optom. 2021 Jul-Sep;14(3):247-253
pubmed: 32800454
J AAPOS. 2011 Apr;15(2):135-9
pubmed: 21419677
J AAPOS. 2010 Aug;14(4):298-304
pubmed: 20736121
Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2014 Jun;21(3):197-203
pubmed: 24742059
Arch Ophthalmol. 1978 Feb;96(2):268-74
pubmed: 629674
Am J Ophthalmol. 2006 Nov;142(5):822-6
pubmed: 17056364
J Am Optom Assoc. 1977 Oct;48(10):1261-73
pubmed: 908827
Optom Vis Sci. 2016 Jan;93(1):57-62
pubmed: 26583796
Br J Ophthalmol. 2013 Jul;97(7):870-3
pubmed: 23645821
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2018 Oct 1;59(12):5011-5021
pubmed: 30326068
Sci Rep. 2015 Aug 19;5:13075
pubmed: 26287935
Eye (Lond). 2011 Apr;25(4):449-54
pubmed: 21311571
Arch Ophthalmol. 1998 Mar;116(3):324-8
pubmed: 9514485
Sci Rep. 2016 Jun 03;6:27113
pubmed: 27257120
Eye (Lond). 2020 Feb;34(2):400-407
pubmed: 31406354
Eye (Lond). 2006 Nov;20(11):1268-72
pubmed: 16167074
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 13;9:CD003737
pubmed: 34516656
Trials. 2022 Apr 11;23(1):289
pubmed: 35410367
Strabismus. 2006 Sep;14(3):147-50
pubmed: 16950743
Sci Rep. 2021 Aug 2;11(1):15584
pubmed: 34341420
Int J Ophthalmol. 2014 Dec 18;7(6):1043-7
pubmed: 25540763
Br J Ophthalmol. 2020 Mar;104(3):350-356
pubmed: 31118183
Am Orthopt J. 1953 Sep;3:27-33
pubmed: 13104828
Am J Ophthalmol. 2011 Aug;152(2):314-9
pubmed: 21621744
Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2006 Apr;34(3):245-51
pubmed: 16671905
Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2001 Mar-Apr;45(2):167-71
pubmed: 11313049
Ophthalmology. 2019 Feb;126(2):305-317
pubmed: 30189281
Optom Vis Sci. 1992 May;69(5):386-404
pubmed: 1594200
Br J Ophthalmol. 2016 Apr;100(4):515-9
pubmed: 26261229
Korean J Ophthalmol. 2022 Dec;36(6):550-564
pubmed: 36220643
Br J Ophthalmol. 2000 Nov;84(11):1333C
pubmed: 11049965
J AAPOS. 2013 Aug;17(4):347-51
pubmed: 23911127
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1991 Jul-Aug;28(4):206-11
pubmed: 1919967
Am J Ophthalmol. 2007 Sep;144(3):465-7
pubmed: 17765436
Am J Ophthalmol. 2008 Mar;145(3):556-561
pubmed: 18201680
Arch Ophthalmol. 2008 Oct;126(10):1336-49
pubmed: 18852411
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006 Feb;47(2):605-13
pubmed: 16431957

Auteurs

Meiping Xu (M)

Eye Hospital and School of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325027, China.
National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Wenzhou 325027, China.

Yiyi Peng (Y)

Eye Hospital and School of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325027, China.

Fuhao Zheng (F)

Eye Hospital and School of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325027, China.
National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Wenzhou 325027, China.

Huanyun Yu (H)

Eye Hospital and School of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325027, China.
National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Wenzhou 325027, China.

Jiawei Zhou (J)

Eye Hospital and School of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325027, China.
National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Wenzhou 325027, China.

Jingwei Zheng (J)

Eye Hospital and School of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325027, China.
National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Wenzhou 325027, China.

Yuwen Wang (Y)

Eye Hospital and School of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325027, China.
National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Wenzhou 325027, China.

Fang Hou (F)

Eye Hospital and School of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325027, China.
National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Wenzhou 325027, China.

Xinping Yu (X)

State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510060, China.

Classifications MeSH