The reactivated bike: Self-reported cycling activity during the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic in Australia.

Active transport Australia COVID-19 Cycling Pandemic Transport policy

Journal

Transportation research interdisciplinary perspectives
ISSN: 2590-1982
Titre abrégé: Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101776215

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jun 2021
Historique:
received: 16 12 2020
revised: 15 04 2021
accepted: 26 04 2021
entrez: 27 2 2023
pubmed: 1 6 2021
medline: 1 6 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

In western societies, the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic restrictions created a boom in cycling activity and business. This article reports findings from an Australia-wide survey that invited responses from those who changed their cycling behaviour during the pandemic lockdowns. The survey premise was that the pandemic lockdowns in each state presented the conditions of a 'natural experiment' to test whether the reduction in automobile traffic affected how cyclists reported experiencing the cycling environment. The survey was in the field from 3 August to 16 September 2020 with purposive sampling. A total of 699 respondents participated, with 444 complete surveys. Key questions we seek to address include: Did cycling activity increase during the pandemic shutdowns? How did cyclists from under-represented groups experience the pandemic lockdowns? The findings are twofold. First, cycling activity increased among most respondents during pandemic lockdowns for exercise and wellbeing, but not for transport. Our survey reports that for respondents the pandemic lockdowns did not result in an uptake of active transport, despite the appearance of 'pop-up' cycle lanes. Second, the reduced traffic of the pandemic shutdown period created a particular opportunity for women to ride bikes. The key policy implication is that cities in Australia should be designed for more relaxed modalities of mobility if the goal is to increase rates of active travel and cycling activity.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36844007
doi: 10.1016/j.trip.2021.100377
pii: S2590-1982(21)00084-1
pmc: PMC9940613
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

100377

Informations de copyright

© 2021 The Author(s).

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Références

Transp Policy (Oxf). 2020 Sep;96:76-93
pubmed: 32834680
Transp Rev. 2017 Jan 2;37(1):29-55
pubmed: 28190905
J Transp Geogr. 2021 Jan;90:102906
pubmed: 35721765
Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect. 2020 Jul;6:100151
pubmed: 34173454
Emerg Infect Dis. 2020 Jul;26(7):1575-1579
pubmed: 32298227
Emerg Infect Dis. 2008 May;14(5):778-86
pubmed: 18439361
Death Stud. 2022;46(4):979-986
pubmed: 32673183
J Transp Health. 2020 Mar;16:100853
pubmed: 32337154
Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect. 2020 May;5:100121
pubmed: 34171016
Emerg Infect Dis. 2007 Sep;13(9):1307-13
pubmed: 18252100
J Public Trans. 2020 Jan;22(1):1-21
pubmed: 36118518

Auteurs

Glen Fuller (G)

University of Canberra, Australia.

Kieran McGuinness (K)

University of Canberra, Australia.

Gordon Waitt (G)

University of Wollongong, Australia.

Ian Buchanan (I)

University of Wollongong, Australia.

Tess Lea (T)

University of Sydney, Australia.

Classifications MeSH