There is no rush to upgrade the tennis racket in young intermediate competitive players: The effects of scaling racket on serve biomechanics and performance.

children’s sport constraints-led approach ecological dynamic approach injury risks joint loadings modified sport performance analysis scaling equipment

Journal

Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2023
Historique:
received: 21 11 2022
accepted: 19 01 2023
entrez: 27 2 2023
pubmed: 28 2 2023
medline: 28 2 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Scaling the equipment of young athletes is justified by the constraints-led approach introduced in motor learning. The aim of the present study is to analyze the effect of racket scaling on the serve biomechanics and performance parameters for young tennis players (between 8 and 11 years-old). Nine young intermediate competitive tennis players (age: 9.9 ± 1.0 years) performed maximal effort flat serves with three different rackets (scaled 23 inches, scaled 25 inches and full-size 27 inches) in a randomized order. A radar measured ball speed while shoulder and elbow kinetics and upper and lower limb kinematics were calculated with a 20-camera optical motion capture system. Repeated measures ANOVAs were used to analyze the effect of the three rackets on ball speed, percentage of serve in, serve kinematics and kinetics. No significant differences in ball speed, maximal racket head velocity and percentage of serve in were observed between the three rackets. The lowest maximal upper limb kinetics and the highest upper limb maximal angular velocities were obtained with the scaled 23 inches racket. Using scaled rackets has the advantage to decrease shoulder and elbow loadings without reducing serve performance. Consequently, the present results incite tennis coaches and parents to not upgrade too soon the size of the racket in young intermediate tennis players to avoid overuse injury risks in the long term. Our results showed that the full-size 27 inches racket induced higher lower limb kinematics. As a consequence, occasionally serving with a fullsize racket can be a sparingly interesting intervention to help young tennis players to intuitively and immediately increase their leg drive action, allowing a more functional representation of the elite junior serve.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36844270
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1104146
pmc: PMC9950502
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1104146

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Touzard, Lecomte, Bideau, Kulpa, Fourel, Fadier, Cantin and Martin.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

Sci Rep. 2020 Dec 3;10(1):21003
pubmed: 33273515
J Sports Sci. 2006 Jan;24(1):31-49
pubmed: 16368612
Sports Med. 1998 Aug;26(2):119-32
pubmed: 9777684
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2013 Nov;45(11):2113-9
pubmed: 23657170
Am J Sports Med. 2014 Nov;42(11):2751-60
pubmed: 25167995
J Sci Med Sport. 2014 Jan;17(1):124-8
pubmed: 23587536
J Sports Sci Med. 2013 Jun 01;12(2):259-66
pubmed: 24149804
J Sports Sci. 2001 Oct;19(10):739-60
pubmed: 11561672
J Appl Biomech. 2013 Oct;29(5):573-82
pubmed: 23270869
Med Sport Sci. 2005;48:120-137
pubmed: 16247255
Sci Rep. 2020 Feb 20;10(1):3111
pubmed: 32080214
Res Q Exerc Sport. 2014 Jun;85(2):218-25
pubmed: 25098017
Phys Sportsmed. 2020 Sep;48(3):342-348
pubmed: 31928289
Br J Sports Med. 2006 May;40(5):401-5
pubmed: 16632569
J Strength Cond Res. 2007 Aug;21(3):950-7
pubmed: 17685715
Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2007 Apr;35(2):62-6
pubmed: 17417052
Br J Sports Med. 2006 Aug;40(8):696-9; discussion 699
pubmed: 16864564
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 17;11(8):e0159979
pubmed: 27532421
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 22;16(7):e0252650
pubmed: 34292954
Eur J Sport Sci. 2019 Jul;19(6):765-773
pubmed: 30417752
Sports Med. 2016 Jun;46(6):829-43
pubmed: 26780345
PLoS One. 2014 Aug 12;9(8):e104785
pubmed: 25117871
Sports Biomech. 2013 Mar;12(1):2-14
pubmed: 23724603
Conscious Cogn. 2014 Nov;30:247-55
pubmed: 25441975
Sports Biomech. 2015 Jun;14(2):180-9
pubmed: 26102205
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008 Feb;40(2):308-15
pubmed: 18202570
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2014 Aug;24(4):700-7
pubmed: 23293868
Psychol Bull. 1992 Jul;112(1):155-9
pubmed: 19565683

Auteurs

Pierre Touzard (P)

M2S Laboratory, University Rennes, Rennes, France.

Chloé Lecomte (C)

M2S Laboratory, University Rennes, Rennes, France.

Benoit Bideau (B)

M2S Laboratory, Inria, University Rennes, Rennes, France.

Richard Kulpa (R)

M2S Laboratory, Inria, University Rennes, Rennes, France.

Loïc Fourel (L)

M2S Laboratory, University Rennes, Rennes, France.

Maxime Fadier (M)

M2S Laboratory, University Rennes, Rennes, France.

Nicolas Cantin (N)

Ille-et-Vilaine Tennis Departmental Committee, Maison Départementale des Sports, French Tennis Federation, Rennes, France.

Caroline Martin (C)

M2S Laboratory, University Rennes, Rennes, France.

Classifications MeSH