Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Arabic Version of the Harris Hip Score.
Arthroplasty
Harris hip score
Hip
Osteoarthritis
Journal
Arthroplasty today
ISSN: 2352-3441
Titre abrégé: Arthroplast Today
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101681808
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2023
Feb 2023
Historique:
received:
22
03
2022
revised:
10
06
2022
accepted:
08
07
2022
entrez:
27
2
2023
pubmed:
28
2
2023
medline:
28
2
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The Harris Hip Score (HHS) questionnaire has been translated and validated into many languages including Italian, Portuguese, and Turkish but not Arabic. The goal of this study was to translate HHS into the Arabic language with cross-cultural adaptation to include and benefit Arabic speaking communities as it is the most widely used instrument for disease-specific hip joint evaluation and measurement of total hip arthroplasty outcome. This questionnaire was translated following a clear and user-friendly guideline protocol. The Cronbach's alpha was used to assess the reliability and internal consistency of the items of HHS. Additionally, the constructive validity of HHS was evaluated against the 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36). A total of 100 participants were included in this study, of which 30 participants were re-evaluated for reliability testing. Cronbach's alpha of the total score of Arabic HHS is 0.528, and after the standardization, it changed to 0.742 which is within the recommended range (0.7-0.9). Lastly, the correlation between HHS and SF-36 was r = 0.71 ( Based on the results, we believe that the Arabic HHS can be used by clinicians, researchers, and patients to evaluate and report hip pathologies and total hip arthroplasty treatment efficacy.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
The Harris Hip Score (HHS) questionnaire has been translated and validated into many languages including Italian, Portuguese, and Turkish but not Arabic. The goal of this study was to translate HHS into the Arabic language with cross-cultural adaptation to include and benefit Arabic speaking communities as it is the most widely used instrument for disease-specific hip joint evaluation and measurement of total hip arthroplasty outcome.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
This questionnaire was translated following a clear and user-friendly guideline protocol. The Cronbach's alpha was used to assess the reliability and internal consistency of the items of HHS. Additionally, the constructive validity of HHS was evaluated against the 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36).
Results
UNASSIGNED
A total of 100 participants were included in this study, of which 30 participants were re-evaluated for reliability testing. Cronbach's alpha of the total score of Arabic HHS is 0.528, and after the standardization, it changed to 0.742 which is within the recommended range (0.7-0.9). Lastly, the correlation between HHS and SF-36 was r = 0.71 (
Conclusions
UNASSIGNED
Based on the results, we believe that the Arabic HHS can be used by clinicians, researchers, and patients to evaluate and report hip pathologies and total hip arthroplasty treatment efficacy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36845291
doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2022.07.006
pii: S2352-3441(22)00154-6
pmc: PMC9947979
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
100990Informations de copyright
© 2022 The Authors.
Références
Arthritis Res Ther. 2009;11(5):R139
pubmed: 19772556
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2009 Oct;17(10):1293-6
pubmed: 19410033
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Jul;87(7):1487-97
pubmed: 15995115
Hip Int. 2015 Jan-Feb;25(1):91-7
pubmed: 25198299
J Korean Med Sci. 2014 Jun;29(6):852-8
pubmed: 24932089
Lancet. 2007 Oct 27;370(9597):1508-19
pubmed: 17964352
Ann Behav Med. 2006 Jun;31(3):297-308
pubmed: 16700644
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Apr;470(4):1090-105
pubmed: 21818668
Br J Sports Med. 2006 Aug;40(8):664-9
pubmed: 16864563
Hip Int. 2014 Sep-Oct;24(5):473-9
pubmed: 25264204
Injury. 2008 Oct;39(10):1147-56
pubmed: 18656868
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2003 May 30;4:10
pubmed: 12777182
Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Jan;58(1):26-35
pubmed: 18163497
Int Orthop. 2009 Jun;33(3):643-51
pubmed: 18461326
Sports Med Int Open. 2020 Feb 17;4(1):E8-E12
pubmed: 32072010
J Arthroplasty. 2002 Apr;17(3):267-73
pubmed: 11938500
East Mediterr Health J. 2019 Nov 04;25(10):706-714
pubmed: 31774136
BMJ. 2008 Mar 1;336(7642):502-3
pubmed: 18310005
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2013 Sep;21(9):1145-53
pubmed: 23973124
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1972 Mar;54(2):207-36
pubmed: 4651258
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Jun 10;17:256
pubmed: 27286675
J Eval Clin Pract. 2011 Apr;17(2):268-74
pubmed: 20874835
Turk J Emerg Med. 2018 Aug 07;18(3):91-93
pubmed: 30191186
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 Sep 2;97(17):1386-97
pubmed: 26333733
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993 Sep;75(5):705-9
pubmed: 8376424
Qual Life Res. 2009 Oct;18(8):1053-60
pubmed: 19609722
J Arthroplasty. 2001 Aug;16(5):575-80
pubmed: 11503116
Br J Sports Med. 2010 Dec;44(16):1186-96
pubmed: 19666629
Health Econ. 1993 Oct;2(3):217-27
pubmed: 8275167
Pain. 2003 Mar;102(1-2):167-78
pubmed: 12620608
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001 Mar;(384):189-97
pubmed: 11249165
Ann Rheum Dis. 2003 Oct;62(10):935-8
pubmed: 12972470
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1969 Jun;51(4):737-55
pubmed: 5783851
Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Jul;73(7):1323-30
pubmed: 24553908