Ultrasound Imaging of the Periodontium Complex: A Reliability Study.
Journal
International journal of dentistry
ISSN: 1687-8728
Titre abrégé: Int J Dent
Pays: Egypt
ID NLM: 101524183
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
31
10
2022
revised:
25
01
2023
accepted:
30
01
2023
entrez:
27
2
2023
pubmed:
28
2
2023
medline:
28
2
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Ultrasonography is a noninvasive, low-cost diagnostic tool widely used in medicine. Recent studies have demonstrated that ultrasound imaging might have the potential to be used intraorally to assess periodontal biomarkers. To evaluate the reliability of interlandmark distance measurements on intraoral ultrasound images of the periodontal tissues. Sixty-four patients from the graduate periodontics ( The ICC scores for intrarater reliability were 0.940 (0.932-0.947), 0.953 (0.945-0.961), and 0.859 (0.841-0.876) for ABC-CEJ, GT, and ABT, respectively. The intrarater MAD values were 0.023 (±0.019) mm, 0.014 (±0.005) mm, and 0.005 (±0.003) mm, respectively. The ICC scores for interrater reliability were 0.872 (95% CI: 0.836-0.901), 0.958 (95% CI: 0.946-0.968), and 0.836 (95% CI: 0.789-0.873) for ABC-CEJ, GT, and ABT, respectively. The interrater MAD values were 0.063 (±0.029) mm, 0.023 (±0.018) mm, and 0.027 (±0.012) mm, respectively. The present study showed the high reliability of ultrasound in both intrarater and interrater assessments. Results suggest there might be a potential use of intraoral ultrasound to assess periodontium.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
Ultrasonography is a noninvasive, low-cost diagnostic tool widely used in medicine. Recent studies have demonstrated that ultrasound imaging might have the potential to be used intraorally to assess periodontal biomarkers.
Objectives
UNASSIGNED
To evaluate the reliability of interlandmark distance measurements on intraoral ultrasound images of the periodontal tissues.
Materials and Methods
UNASSIGNED
Sixty-four patients from the graduate periodontics (
Results
UNASSIGNED
The ICC scores for intrarater reliability were 0.940 (0.932-0.947), 0.953 (0.945-0.961), and 0.859 (0.841-0.876) for ABC-CEJ, GT, and ABT, respectively. The intrarater MAD values were 0.023 (±0.019) mm, 0.014 (±0.005) mm, and 0.005 (±0.003) mm, respectively. The ICC scores for interrater reliability were 0.872 (95% CI: 0.836-0.901), 0.958 (95% CI: 0.946-0.968), and 0.836 (95% CI: 0.789-0.873) for ABC-CEJ, GT, and ABT, respectively. The interrater MAD values were 0.063 (±0.029) mm, 0.023 (±0.018) mm, and 0.027 (±0.012) mm, respectively.
Conclusions
UNASSIGNED
The present study showed the high reliability of ultrasound in both intrarater and interrater assessments. Results suggest there might be a potential use of intraoral ultrasound to assess periodontium.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36845629
doi: 10.1155/2023/5494429
pmc: PMC9949946
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
5494429Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Carlos Alberto Figueredo et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Références
Ultrasonics. 2014 Jul;54(5):1178-85
pubmed: 24074751
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011 May-Jun;26(3):499-508
pubmed: 21691596
J Dent Res. 2012 Oct;91(10):914-20
pubmed: 22935673
JDR Clin Trans Res. 2021 Jul;6(3):295-310
pubmed: 32718265
J Clin Periodontol. 1999 Jul;26(7):434-40
pubmed: 10412847
Acta Inform Med. 2011 Sep;19(3):168-71
pubmed: 23408755
J Periodontol. 1992 Dec;63 Suppl 12S:1072-1077
pubmed: 29539706
J Periodontol. 2010 Feb;81(2):186-98
pubmed: 20151796
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Nov;140(5):734-44
pubmed: 22051495
J Clin Periodontol. 1984 Oct;11(9):583-9
pubmed: 6593330
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Aug;138(2):133.e1-7; discussion 133-5
pubmed: 20691344
World J Radiol. 2014 Oct 28;6(10):794-807
pubmed: 25349663
J Dent Res. 2022 Mar;101(3):278-285
pubmed: 34515570
Insights Imaging. 2018 Feb;9(1):35-45
pubmed: 29302798
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2008;55(6):1256-66
pubmed: 18599413
J Periodontol. 2018 Jun;89 Suppl 1:S159-S172
pubmed: 29926952
Angle Orthod. 2021 Jul 1;91(4):459-467
pubmed: 33625489
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2022 Sep;134(3):375-385
pubmed: 35568639
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2016 Jan;42(1):333-8
pubmed: 26546266
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 3;13(10):e0200596
pubmed: 30281591
BMC Oral Health. 2021 Jan 6;21(1):10
pubmed: 33407377
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 8;12(2):e0171237
pubmed: 28178323
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018 Jun;20(3):280-284
pubmed: 29350855
J Clin Periodontol. 2014 Jul;41(7):693-700
pubmed: 24730621
Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2012 Nov;30(4):849-67
pubmed: 23137399
J Chiropr Med. 2016 Jun;15(2):155-63
pubmed: 27330520
J Periodontol. 2018 Jun;89 Suppl 1:S173-S182
pubmed: 29926951
Aust Dent J. 2009 Sep;54 Suppl 1:S27-43
pubmed: 19737266
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017 May;28(5):520-528
pubmed: 27018152
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2014 Jul-Aug;34(4):559-63
pubmed: 25006773
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2020 Oct 01;49(7):20190318
pubmed: 32364758
J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2009 Jan;13(1):12-5
pubmed: 20376234
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2017 Jun;43(6):1085-1104
pubmed: 28342566
Ann Biomed Eng. 2016 Oct;44(10):2874-2886
pubmed: 27160674
J Dent. 2021 Sep;112:103752
pubmed: 34314726
J Periodontol. 2020 Jul;91(7):890-899
pubmed: 31837020
Quintessence Int. 2016 Jan;47(1):25-37
pubmed: 26669748
Chin J Dent Res. 2015 Sep;18(3):171-6
pubmed: 26485509
Med Ultrason. 2011 Jun;13(2):120-6
pubmed: 21655538
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2021 Jul 01;50(5):20200309
pubmed: 33201732
J Clin Periodontol. 2021 Apr;48(4):602-614
pubmed: 33465812
Open Dent J. 2013;7:1-6
pubmed: 23400554
Skin Res Technol. 2021 Sep;27(5):682-691
pubmed: 33405267
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2006 Jul;35(4):219-26
pubmed: 16798915
J Periodontol. 1987 Apr;58(4):262-5
pubmed: 3295184
J Periodontol. 1992 Apr;63 Suppl 4S:367-372
pubmed: 29539691