BREAST-Q Patient-reported Outcomes in Different Types of Breast Reconstruction after Fat Grafting.
Journal
Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open
ISSN: 2169-7574
Titre abrégé: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101622231
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2023
Feb 2023
Historique:
received:
18
08
2022
accepted:
14
12
2022
entrez:
27
2
2023
pubmed:
28
2
2023
medline:
28
2
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Breast reconstruction after mastectomy improves patient quality of life. Independently of the type of reconstruction, ancillary procedures are sometimes necessary to improve results. Fat grafting to the breast is a safe procedure with excellent results. We report patient-reported outcomes using the BREAST-Q questionnaire after autologous fat grafting in different types of reconstructed breasts. We performed a single-center, prospective, comparative study that compared patient-reported outcomes using the BREAST-Q in patients after different types of breast reconstruction (autologous, alloplastic, or after breast conserving) who subsequently had fat grafting. In total, 254 patients were eligible for the study, but only 54 (68 breasts) completed all the stages needed for inclusion. Patient demographic and breast characteristics are described. Median age was 52 years. The mean body mass index was 26.1 ± 3.9. The mean postoperative period at the administration of BREAST-Q questionnaires was 17.6 months. The mean preoperative BREAST-Q was 59.92 ± 17.37, and the mean postoperative score was 74.84 ± 12.48 ( Fat grafting is an ancillary procedure that improves the outcomes in breast reconstruction independently of the reconstruction type and heightens patient satisfaction, and it should be considered an integral part of any reconstruction algorithm.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36845864
doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004814
pmc: PMC9946430
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e4814Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons.
Références
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 Aug;124(2):409-418
pubmed: 19644255
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2016 Apr;69(4):475-81
pubmed: 26876108
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 Jul;124(1):272-280
pubmed: 19346997
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Apr;180(2):301-309
pubmed: 32026213
Plast Surg Nurs. 1987 Winter;7(4):140-1
pubmed: 3438355
Ann Plast Surg. 2016 Mar;76(3):270-5
pubmed: 26101979
Clin Plast Surg. 1997 Apr;24(2):347-67
pubmed: 9142473
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2012 Apr;12(2):149-58
pubmed: 22458616
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2020 Feb;73(2):278-285
pubmed: 31711862
Support Care Cancer. 2017 Aug;25(8):2631-2661
pubmed: 28474240
Ann Plast Surg. 2004 Mar;52(3):258-61; discussion 262
pubmed: 15156978
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007 Mar;119(3):775-85; discussion 786-7
pubmed: 17312477
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Aug;132(2):201e-209e
pubmed: 23897347
Breast J. 2015 Sep-Oct;21(5):520-5
pubmed: 26133468
Breast Cancer. 2018 Jul;25(4):464-469
pubmed: 29442215
JAMA Surg. 2018 Oct 1;153(10):891-899
pubmed: 29926096
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015 May;41(5):612-6
pubmed: 25800344
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2019 May 30;74:e883
pubmed: 31166474
Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Oct;25(10):3052-3056
pubmed: 29968032
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022 Jul 1;150(1):42e-50e
pubmed: 35499515
Clin Plast Surg. 2015 Jul;42(3):315-23, vii
pubmed: 26116937
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1989 Feb;83(2):368-81
pubmed: 2643129
Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 2016 Jun;61(3):190-9
pubmed: 26603209
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998 Mar;101(3):820-6
pubmed: 9500405
JAMA Surg. 2017 Oct 01;152(10):944-950
pubmed: 28658472
Breast. 2017 Oct;35:14-20
pubmed: 28624714
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2018 Nov;71(11):1570-1576
pubmed: 30236874
World J Surg. 2016 May;40(5):1104-11
pubmed: 26732667
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Feb;137(2):385-393
pubmed: 26818270
Breast. 2006 Feb;15(1):29-38
pubmed: 16002292
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 Aug;124(2):345-353
pubmed: 19644246