Ocular trauma, visual acuity related to time of referral and psychosocial determinants, during COVID‑19 pandemic: A prospective study.
ocular injury
prospective
psychosocial determinants
referrals
visual outcomes
Journal
Experimental and therapeutic medicine
ISSN: 1792-1015
Titre abrégé: Exp Ther Med
Pays: Greece
ID NLM: 101531947
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2023
Mar 2023
Historique:
received:
29
11
2022
accepted:
25
01
2023
entrez:
27
2
2023
pubmed:
28
2
2023
medline:
28
2
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The aim of the present study was to explore the associations between visual outcomes of ocular injury patients in a tertiary hospital unit with clinical and demographic variables and to evaluate the psychosocial impact of the injury on the patients. An 18-month prospective study of 30 eye-injured adult patients was conducted in the General University Hospital of Heraklion, Crete, a tertiary referral hospital. All severe eye injury case information was prospectively collected between February 1, 2020 and August 31, 2021. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was labelled not poor (>0.5/10 or >20/400 on the Snellen scale, <1.3 in LogMAR scale) and poor (≤0.5/10 or ≤20/400 on the Snellen scale, ≥1.3 on the LogMAR equivalent). Data regarding participants' perceived stress levels, by using Perceived Stress Scale 14 (PSS-14), were collected prospectively, one year after study end. Out of 30 ocular injury patients selected, 76.7% were men and most of them were self-employed and private or public sector workers (36.7%). Not poor final BCVA was related to not poor initial BCVA [odds ratio (OR) 1.714; P=0.006]. No statistical associations were found between visual outcome and demographic or clinical factors, but not poor final BCVA was associated with improved self-reported psychological condition of the sufferers, as examined by a questionnaire sheet developed to collect information for study purpose (8.36/10 vs. 6.40/10; P=0.011). No patient reported job loss or changed work status following the injury. Not poor initial BCVA was a significant predictor for not poor final visual outcomes (OR 1.714; P=0.006). Patients with not poor final BCVA expressed higher levels of positive psychology (8.36/10 vs. 6.40/10; P=0.011) and less fear of eye injury repetition (64.0 vs. 100.0%; P=0.286). Not poor final BCVA was associated with low PSS-14 scores one year after study end (77.3 vs. 0.0%, P=0.003). Collaboration between ophthalmologists, mental health professionals and primary care team may be important in order to help patients to cope with the psychosocial burden sequel to eye trauma.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36845962
doi: 10.3892/etm.2023.11829
pii: ETM-25-3-11829
pmc: PMC9947913
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
130Informations de copyright
Copyright: © Kyriakaki et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
DS is the Editor-in-Chief for the journal, but had no personal involvement in the reviewing process, or any influence in terms of adjudicating on the final decision, for this article. Another member of the editorial board handled the manuscript as editor. The other authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Références
Int Ophthalmol. 2017 Jun;37(3):539-544
pubmed: 27447922
New Solut. 2008;18(3):343-60
pubmed: 19058415
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2011 Aug;8(8):3287-98
pubmed: 21909307
J Health Soc Behav. 1983 Dec;24(4):385-96
pubmed: 6668417
Exp Ther Med. 2021 Sep;22(3):1039
pubmed: 34373725
Cureus. 2021 Jun 22;13(6):e15846
pubmed: 34327079
Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2014 Apr;77(2):95-8
pubmed: 25076473
Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 2022 Sep 01;11(5):481-487
pubmed: 36094376
Afr Health Sci. 2020 Jun;20(2):779-788
pubmed: 33163044
Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2003 Spring;43(2):17-30
pubmed: 12711900
Am J Ophthalmol. 1997 Jun;123(6):820-31
pubmed: 9535627
Surv Ophthalmol. 2001 May-Jun;45(6):531-48
pubmed: 11425359
Sci Rep. 2019 Mar 7;9(1):3783
pubmed: 30846779
Ethiop J Health Sci. 2019 Sep;29(5):631-638
pubmed: 31666785
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2021 Sep;219:103383
pubmed: 34352606
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 28;14(3):e0213893
pubmed: 30921358
Korean J Ophthalmol. 2022 Oct;36(5):443-451
pubmed: 35989073
Croat Med J. 2004 Jun;45(3):268-74
pubmed: 15185415
Int Med Case Rep J. 2020 Oct 09;13:493-501
pubmed: 33116940
Bull World Health Organ. 1985;63(2):375-86
pubmed: 3874717
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Nov 21;52(12):8951-6
pubmed: 22003122
Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2005 Aug;12(4):259-69
pubmed: 16033747
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004 Feb;30(2):287-90
pubmed: 15030802
J Ophthalmol. 2021 Feb 04;2021:6629589
pubmed: 33614167
Clin Ophthalmol. 2022 Aug 22;16:2733-2742
pubmed: 36035239
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2008 Feb;246(2):223-8
pubmed: 18180943
Eye (Lond). 2022 Jan;36(1):244-245
pubmed: 33423041
Ophthalmol Clin North Am. 2002 Jun;15(2):139-43, v
pubmed: 12229228