Optimising soft tissue in-growth

ITAP in-vivo model orthopaedic implants osseointegrated transcutaneous implants

Journal

Biomaterials translational
ISSN: 2096-112X
Titre abrégé: Biomater Transl
Pays: China
ID NLM: 9918351163606676

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2022
Historique:
received: 24 08 2022
revised: 28 09 2022
accepted: 11 11 2022
entrez: 27 2 2023
pubmed: 28 2 2023
medline: 28 2 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Osseointegrated transcutaneous implants could provide an alternative and improved means of attaching artificial limbs for amputees, however epithelial down growth, inflammation, and infections are common failure modalities associated with their use. To overcome these problems, a tight seal associated with the epidermal and dermal adhesion to the implant is crucial. This could be achieved with specific biomaterials (that mimic the surrounding tissue), or a tissue-specific design to enhance the proliferation and attachment of dermal fibroblasts and keratinocytes. The intraosseous transcutaneous amputation prosthesis is a new device with a pylon and a flange, which is specifically designed for optimising soft tissue attachment. Previously the flange has been fabricated using traditional machining techniques, however, the advent of additive layer manufacturing (ALM) has enabled 3-dimensional porous flanges with specific pore sizes to be used to optimise soft tissue integration and reduce failure of osseointegrated transcutaneous implants. The study aimed to investigate the effect of ALM-manufactured porous flanges on soft tissue ingrowth and attachment in an in vivo ovine model that replicates an osseointegrated percutaneous implant. At 12 and 24 weeks, epithelial downgrowth, dermal attachment and revascularisation into ALM-manufactured flanges with three different pore sizes were compared with machined controls where the pores were made using conventional drilling. The pore sizes of the ALM flanges were 700, 1000 and 1250 μm. We hypothesised that ALM porous flanges would reduce downgrowth, improve soft tissue integration and revascularisation compared with machined controls. The results supported our hypothesis with significantly greater soft tissue integration and revascularisation in ALM porous flanges compared with machined controls.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36846509
doi: 10.12336/biomatertransl.2022.04.004
pmc: PMC9947732
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

243-249

Références

Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2016 Feb;59:690-701
pubmed: 26652423
Laryngoscope. 2015 Aug;125(8):1934-9
pubmed: 25703159
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol. 2017 Jan 16;30(1):59-61
pubmed: 27977027
Vet Surg. 2011 Dec;40(8):909-25
pubmed: 22092391
Biomaterials. 2011 Oct;32(29):7096-105
pubmed: 21741704
Med Eng Phys. 2011 May;33(4):418-26
pubmed: 21145778
Bone Joint J. 2017 Mar;99-B(3):393-400
pubmed: 28249981
J Orthop Res. 2020 Jul;38(7):1445-1454
pubmed: 31876306
J Arthroplasty. 2022 Aug;37(8):1494-1500
pubmed: 35189292
J Physiother. 2014 Dec;60(4):224-31
pubmed: 25450484
Stem Cells Int. 2015;2015:167025
pubmed: 26351461
Mil Med. 2021 Jan 25;186(Suppl 1):688-695
pubmed: 33499499
Biomed Eng Lett. 2019 Nov 11;10(1):5-16
pubmed: 32175127
Med J Armed Forces India. 1996 Jul;52(3):169-171
pubmed: 28769378
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008 Jan;90(1):114-21
pubmed: 18160512
J Anat. 2013 Oct;223(4):364-84
pubmed: 23961846
Arch Dermatol Res. 2010 Jul;302(5):357-65
pubmed: 19956960
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2019 Dec 12;19(7):1-126
pubmed: 31911825
Biomaterials. 2006 Aug;27(23):4183-91
pubmed: 16618500
J Polym Environ. 2020;28(5):1345-1367
pubmed: 32435165
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Oct;472(10):2947-56
pubmed: 24879569
Adv Healthc Mater. 2021 Jul;10(14):e2100229
pubmed: 34165264
J Hand Surg Am. 2010 Jul;35(7):1130-4
pubmed: 20541327
Arthritis Res Ther. 2007;9 Suppl 1:S6
pubmed: 17634145
ScientificWorldJournal. 2014;2014:849073
pubmed: 25197716
Biomaterials. 2021 Jun;273:120836
pubmed: 33894405
Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 2005 Nov;35(6):1441-51, ix
pubmed: 16260321

Auteurs

Elena Giusto (E)

Institute of Orthopaedic & Musculoskeletal Science, University College London, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, UK.
Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University London, London, UK.

Gordon Blunn (G)

Institute of Orthopaedic & Musculoskeletal Science, University College London, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, UK.
School of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK.

Roberta Ferro de Godoy (RF)

Institute of Orthopaedic & Musculoskeletal Science, University College London, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, UK.
Writtle University College, Writtle, UK.

Chaozong Liu (C)

Institute of Orthopaedic & Musculoskeletal Science, University College London, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, UK.

Catherine Pendegrass (C)

Institute of Orthopaedic & Musculoskeletal Science, University College London, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, UK.

Classifications MeSH