Assessing the artificially intelligent workplace: an ethical framework for evaluating experimental technologies in workplace settings.
Ethics of technology
Meaningful work
New technologies
Social experiments
Workplaces
Journal
AI and ethics
ISSN: 2730-5961
Titre abrégé: AI Ethics
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 9918284169806676
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
21 Feb 2023
21 Feb 2023
Historique:
received:
15
09
2022
accepted:
29
01
2023
entrez:
27
2
2023
pubmed:
28
2
2023
medline:
28
2
2023
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Experimental technologies, including AI and robots, are revolutionising many types of work. For example, the logistics warehouse sector is witnessing a wave of new technologies, such as automated picking tools, collaborative robots and exoskeletons, affecting jobs and employees. Notably, it is not always possible to predict the effects of such new technologies, since they have inherent uncertainties and unintended consequences. Hence, their introduction into workplaces can be conceived as a social experiment. This paper aims to sketch a set of ethical guidelines for introducing experimental technologies into workplaces. It builds on Van de Poel's general framework for assessing new experimental technologies and translates that framework into a more specific context of work. We discuss its five principles: non-maleficence, beneficence, responsibility, autonomy, and justice. Each of these principles is applied to workplaces in general, and specifically to the logistics warehouse setting as a case study. A particular focus in our discussion is put on the distinctive potential harms and goods of work.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36846834
doi: 10.1007/s43681-023-00265-w
pii: 265
pmc: PMC9942061
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1-13Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2023.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of interestAll five authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Références
Sci Eng Ethics. 2020 Aug;26(4):2169-2188
pubmed: 31872366
Hum Factors. 2014 Feb;56(1):112-30
pubmed: 24669547
Sci Eng Ethics. 2016 Jun;22(3):667-86
pubmed: 26573302
J Appl Psychol. 2017 Mar;102(3):403-420
pubmed: 28182465
Hastings Cent Rep. 2019 Jan;49(1):15-21
pubmed: 30790315
Ergonomics. 2014;57(3):289-94
pubmed: 24670142
Sci Eng Ethics. 2020 Dec;26(6):3229-3247
pubmed: 32996058