Intratympanic corticosteroids for Ménière's disease.


Journal

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews
ISSN: 1469-493X
Titre abrégé: Cochrane Database Syst Rev
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100909747

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
27 02 2023
Historique:
entrez: 27 2 2023
pubmed: 28 2 2023
medline: 3 3 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Ménière's disease is a condition that causes recurrent episodes of vertigo, associated with hearing loss and tinnitus. Corticosteroids are sometimes administered directly into the middle ear to treat this condition (through the tympanic membrane). The underlying cause of Ménière's disease is unknown, as is the way in which this treatment may work. The efficacy of this intervention in preventing vertigo attacks, and their associated symptoms, is currently unclear. To evaluate the benefits and harms of intratympanic corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment in people with Ménière's disease. The Cochrane ENT Information Specialist searched the Cochrane ENT Register; Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL); Ovid MEDLINE; Ovid Embase; Web of Science; ClinicalTrials.gov; ICTRP and additional sources for published and unpublished trials. The date of the search was 14 September 2022. We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs in adults with a diagnosis of Ménière's disease comparing intratympanic corticosteroids with either placebo or no treatment. We excluded studies with follow-up of less than three months, or with a cross-over design (unless data from the first phase of the study could be identified).  DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcomes were: 1) improvement in vertigo (assessed as a dichotomous outcome - improved or not improved), 2) change in vertigo (assessed as a continuous outcome, with a score on a numerical scale) and 3) serious adverse events. Our secondary outcomes were: 4) disease-specific health-related quality of life, 5) change in hearing, 6) change in tinnitus and 7) other adverse effects (including tympanic membrane perforation). We considered outcomes reported at three time points: 3 to < 6 months, 6 to ≤ 12 months and > 12 months. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence for each outcome.  MAIN RESULTS: We included 10 studies with a total of 952 participants. All studies used the corticosteroid dexamethasone, with doses ranging from approximately 2 mg to 12 mg.  Improvement in vertigo Intratympanic corticosteroids may make little or no difference to the number of people who report an improvement in their vertigo at 6 to ≤ 12 months follow-up (intratympanic corticosteroids 96.8%, placebo 96.6%, risk ratio (RR) 1.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.92 to 1.10; 2 studies; 60 participants; low-certainty evidence) or at more than 12 months follow-up (intratympanic corticosteroids 100%, placebo 96.3%; RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.23; 2 studies; 58 participants; low-certainty evidence). However, we note the large improvement in the placebo group for these trials, which causes challenges in interpreting these results.  Change in vertigo Assessed with a global score One study (44 participants) assessed the change in vertigo at 3 to < 6 months using a global score, which considered the frequency, duration and severity of vertigo. This is a single, small study and the certainty of the evidence was very low. We are unable to draw meaningful conclusions from the numerical results. Assessed by frequency of vertigo Three studies (304 participants) assessed the change in frequency of vertigo episodes at 3 to < 6 months. Intratympanic corticosteroids may slightly reduce the frequency of vertigo episodes. The proportion of days affected by vertigo was 0.05 lower (absolute difference -5%) in those receiving intratympanic corticosteroids (95% CI -0.07 to -0.02; 3 studies; 472 participants; low-certainty evidence). This is equivalent to a difference of approximately 1.5 days fewer per month affected by vertigo in the corticosteroid group (with the control group having vertigo on approximately 2.5 to 3.5 days per month at the end of follow-up, and those receiving corticosteroids having vertigo on approximately 1 to 2 days per month). However, this result should be interpreted with caution - we are aware of unpublished data at this time point in which corticosteroids failed to show a benefit over placebo. One study also assessed the change in frequency of vertigo at 6 to ≤ 12 months and > 12 months follow-up. However, this is a single, small study and the certainty of the evidence was very low. Therefore, we are unable to draw meaningful conclusions from the numerical results. Serious adverse events Four studies reported this outcome. There may be little or no effect on the occurrence of serious adverse events with intratympanic corticosteroids, but the evidence is very uncertain (intratympanic corticosteroids 3.0%, placebo 4.4%; RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.22 to 1.85; 4 studies; 500 participants; very low-certainty evidence). The evidence for intratympanic corticosteroids in the treatment of Ménière's disease is uncertain. There are relatively few published RCTs, which all consider the same type of corticosteroid (dexamethasone). We also have concerns about publication bias in this area, with the identification of two large RCTs that remain unpublished. The evidence comparing intratympanic corticosteroids to placebo or no treatment is therefore all low- or very low-certainty. This means that we have very low confidence that the effects reported are accurate estimates of the true effect of these interventions. Consensus on the appropriate outcomes to measure in studies of Ménière's disease is needed (i.e. a core outcome set) in order to guide future studies in this area, and enable meta-analysis of the results. This must include appropriate consideration of the potential harms of treatment, as well as the benefits. Finally, we would also highlight the responsibility that trialists have to ensure results are available, regardless of the outcome of their study.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Ménière's disease is a condition that causes recurrent episodes of vertigo, associated with hearing loss and tinnitus. Corticosteroids are sometimes administered directly into the middle ear to treat this condition (through the tympanic membrane). The underlying cause of Ménière's disease is unknown, as is the way in which this treatment may work. The efficacy of this intervention in preventing vertigo attacks, and their associated symptoms, is currently unclear.
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate the benefits and harms of intratympanic corticosteroids versus placebo or no treatment in people with Ménière's disease.
SEARCH METHODS
The Cochrane ENT Information Specialist searched the Cochrane ENT Register; Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL); Ovid MEDLINE; Ovid Embase; Web of Science; ClinicalTrials.gov; ICTRP and additional sources for published and unpublished trials. The date of the search was 14 September 2022.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs in adults with a diagnosis of Ménière's disease comparing intratympanic corticosteroids with either placebo or no treatment. We excluded studies with follow-up of less than three months, or with a cross-over design (unless data from the first phase of the study could be identified).  DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcomes were: 1) improvement in vertigo (assessed as a dichotomous outcome - improved or not improved), 2) change in vertigo (assessed as a continuous outcome, with a score on a numerical scale) and 3) serious adverse events. Our secondary outcomes were: 4) disease-specific health-related quality of life, 5) change in hearing, 6) change in tinnitus and 7) other adverse effects (including tympanic membrane perforation). We considered outcomes reported at three time points: 3 to < 6 months, 6 to ≤ 12 months and > 12 months. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence for each outcome.  MAIN RESULTS: We included 10 studies with a total of 952 participants. All studies used the corticosteroid dexamethasone, with doses ranging from approximately 2 mg to 12 mg.  Improvement in vertigo Intratympanic corticosteroids may make little or no difference to the number of people who report an improvement in their vertigo at 6 to ≤ 12 months follow-up (intratympanic corticosteroids 96.8%, placebo 96.6%, risk ratio (RR) 1.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.92 to 1.10; 2 studies; 60 participants; low-certainty evidence) or at more than 12 months follow-up (intratympanic corticosteroids 100%, placebo 96.3%; RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.23; 2 studies; 58 participants; low-certainty evidence). However, we note the large improvement in the placebo group for these trials, which causes challenges in interpreting these results.  Change in vertigo Assessed with a global score One study (44 participants) assessed the change in vertigo at 3 to < 6 months using a global score, which considered the frequency, duration and severity of vertigo. This is a single, small study and the certainty of the evidence was very low. We are unable to draw meaningful conclusions from the numerical results. Assessed by frequency of vertigo Three studies (304 participants) assessed the change in frequency of vertigo episodes at 3 to < 6 months. Intratympanic corticosteroids may slightly reduce the frequency of vertigo episodes. The proportion of days affected by vertigo was 0.05 lower (absolute difference -5%) in those receiving intratympanic corticosteroids (95% CI -0.07 to -0.02; 3 studies; 472 participants; low-certainty evidence). This is equivalent to a difference of approximately 1.5 days fewer per month affected by vertigo in the corticosteroid group (with the control group having vertigo on approximately 2.5 to 3.5 days per month at the end of follow-up, and those receiving corticosteroids having vertigo on approximately 1 to 2 days per month). However, this result should be interpreted with caution - we are aware of unpublished data at this time point in which corticosteroids failed to show a benefit over placebo. One study also assessed the change in frequency of vertigo at 6 to ≤ 12 months and > 12 months follow-up. However, this is a single, small study and the certainty of the evidence was very low. Therefore, we are unable to draw meaningful conclusions from the numerical results. Serious adverse events Four studies reported this outcome. There may be little or no effect on the occurrence of serious adverse events with intratympanic corticosteroids, but the evidence is very uncertain (intratympanic corticosteroids 3.0%, placebo 4.4%; RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.22 to 1.85; 4 studies; 500 participants; very low-certainty evidence).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
The evidence for intratympanic corticosteroids in the treatment of Ménière's disease is uncertain. There are relatively few published RCTs, which all consider the same type of corticosteroid (dexamethasone). We also have concerns about publication bias in this area, with the identification of two large RCTs that remain unpublished. The evidence comparing intratympanic corticosteroids to placebo or no treatment is therefore all low- or very low-certainty. This means that we have very low confidence that the effects reported are accurate estimates of the true effect of these interventions. Consensus on the appropriate outcomes to measure in studies of Ménière's disease is needed (i.e. a core outcome set) in order to guide future studies in this area, and enable meta-analysis of the results. This must include appropriate consideration of the potential harms of treatment, as well as the benefits. Finally, we would also highlight the responsibility that trialists have to ensure results are available, regardless of the outcome of their study.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36847608
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015245.pub2
pmc: PMC9969957
doi:

Substances chimiques

Adrenal Cortex Hormones 0
Dexamethasone 7S5I7G3JQL

Types de publication

Journal Article Meta-Analysis Review Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

CD015245

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. on behalf of The Cochrane Collaboration.

Références

Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2012 Jun;12(3):255-60
pubmed: 22457225
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011 Aug;145(2):282-7
pubmed: 21493265
J Otol. 2017 Sep;12(3):117-124
pubmed: 29937846
Anaesthesia. 2017 Aug;72(8):944-952
pubmed: 28580651
Clin Otolaryngol. 2019 Jul;44(4):619-627
pubmed: 31025490
Otol Neurotol. 2016 Dec;37(10):1669-1676
pubmed: 27749754
Arch Neurol. 2001 Jul;58(7):1151-6
pubmed: 11448308
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2006 Sep;263(9):791-7
pubmed: 16724210
Appl Clin Genet. 2015 Jan 08;8:9-17
pubmed: 25609993
Am J Otol. 1998 Nov;19(6):804-8
pubmed: 9831158
Ear Hear. 2012 Mar-Apr;33(2):153-76
pubmed: 22156949
Audiol Neurootol. 2009;14(6):373-82
pubmed: 19923807
Am J Otol. 1998 Mar;19(2):196-201
pubmed: 9520056
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Nov 01;24(6):1165-1168
pubmed: 28541493
Otol Neurotol. 2004 Nov;25(6):1034-9
pubmed: 15547441
Acta Otorinolaryngol Iber Am. 1965;16(5):511-21
pubmed: 5851670
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Feb 27;2:CD015245
pubmed: 36847608
Laryngoscope. 1999 Jul;109(7 Pt 2):1-17
pubmed: 10399889
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 1;15(9):e0237523
pubmed: 32870918
Am J Otolaryngol. 2016 Sep-Oct;37(5):455-8
pubmed: 27221028
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Feb 23;2:CD015171
pubmed: 36827524
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1990 Apr;116(4):424-7
pubmed: 2317323
Int Tinnitus J. 2017 Jun 01;21(1):21-23
pubmed: 28723597
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Jul;135:70-78
pubmed: 33592277
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014 Dec 19;14:135
pubmed: 25524443
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1999 Apr;108(4):331-7
pubmed: 10214778
Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1992 Jun;17(3):231-6
pubmed: 1387052
Angiology. 1965 Nov;16(11):644-50
pubmed: 5844137
Am J Otol. 1996 Jul;17(4):595-602
pubmed: 8841705
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1999 May-Jun;78(3):233-41
pubmed: 10340421
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004 Jun;130(6):718-25
pubmed: 15210552
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2009;71(2):78-86
pubmed: 19142031
Clin Genet. 2014 Mar;85(3):245-52
pubmed: 23521103
J Neurol. 2022 Jan;269(1):72-86
pubmed: 33387016
Autoimmun Rev. 2012 Aug;11(10):731-8
pubmed: 22306860
J Vestib Res. 2015;25(1):1-7
pubmed: 25882471
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1996 Feb;122(2):143-8
pubmed: 8630207
Practitioner. 1971 Dec;207(242):759-66
pubmed: 5143898
Otol Neurotol. 2019 Jul;40(6):806-812
pubmed: 31135678
Ear Hear. 2016 May-Jun;37(3):e202-9
pubmed: 26760200
J Psychosom Res. 1992 Dec;36(8):731-41
pubmed: 1432863
Clin Otolaryngol. 2015 Dec;40(6):682-90
pubmed: 25916787
BMJ. 2014 Nov 12;349:g6544
pubmed: 25391837
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Feb 27;2:CD015246
pubmed: 36847592
Medwave. 2017 Mar 13;17(Suppl1):e6863
pubmed: 28306710
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005 Aug;133(2):285-94
pubmed: 16087029
Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol. 1972 Nov-Dec;76(6):1462-4
pubmed: 4666434
Proc R Soc Med. 1938 Sep;31(11):1317-36
pubmed: 19991672
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1996 Jul;115(1):38-41
pubmed: 8758627
Otol Neurotol. 2017 Oct;38(9):1370-1375
pubmed: 28832394
Acta Otolaryngol. 2010 Jun;130(6):644-51
pubmed: 20001444
Otol Neurotol. 2002 Nov;23(6):941-8
pubmed: 12438860
Am J Otolaryngol. 2016 May-Jun;37(3):225-30
pubmed: 27178513
Audiol Neurootol. 2017;22(2):74-82
pubmed: 28723686
Laryngoscope. 2008 May;118(5):854-61
pubmed: 18520184
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Sep;137:163-175
pubmed: 33857619
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1995 Sep;113(3):181-5
pubmed: 7675476
BMJ Clin Evid. 2015 Nov 05;2015:
pubmed: 26545070
Br J Gen Pract. 1998 Apr;48(429):1136-40
pubmed: 9667087
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Jul 06;(7):CD008514
pubmed: 21735432
Audiol Neurootol. 2010;15(5):318-22
pubmed: 20173319
Otol Neurotol. 2012 Sep;33(7):1257-65
pubmed: 22858715

Auteurs

Katie E Webster (KE)

Cochrane ENT, Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Ambrose Lee (A)

Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Kevin Galbraith (K)

Cochrane ENT, Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Natasha A Harrington-Benton (NA)

Ménière's Society, Wooton, UK.

Owen Judd (O)

ENT Department, University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust, Derby, UK.

Diego Kaski (D)

National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK.

Otto R Maarsingh (OR)

Department of General Practice, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Samuel MacKeith (S)

ENT Department, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.

Jaydip Ray (J)

University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.

Vincent A Van Vugt (VA)

Department of General Practice, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Brian Westerberg (B)

Otology & Neurotology, St. Paul's Rotary Hearing Clinic, Vancouver, Canada.

Martin J Burton (MJ)

Cochrane UK, Oxford, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH