Sociometric network analysis in illicit drugs research: A scoping review.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
29
06
2022
accepted:
12
02
2023
entrez:
27
2
2023
pubmed:
28
2
2023
medline:
3
3
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Sociometric or whole network analysis, a method used to analyze relational patterns among social actors, emphasizes the role of social structure in shaping behaviour. Such method has been applied to many aspects of illicit drug research, including in the areas of public health, epidemiology, and criminology. Previous reviews about social networks and drugs have lacked a focus on the use of sociometric network analysis for illicit drugs research across disciplines. The current scoping review aimed to provide an overview of the sociometric network analysis methods used in illicit drugs research and to assess how such methods could be used for future research. A systematic search of six databases (Web of Science, ProQuest Sociology Collection, Political Science Complete, PubMed, Criminal Justice Abstracts, and PsycINFO) returned 72 relevant studies that met the inclusion criteria. To be included, studies had to mention illicit drugs and use whole social network analysis as one of their methods. Studies were summarized quantitatively and qualitatively using a data-charting form and a description of the studies' main topics. Sociometric network analysis in illicit drugs research has grown in popularity in the last decade, using mostly descriptive network metrics, such as degree centrality (72.2%) and density (44.4%). Studies were found to belong to three study domains. The first, drug crimes investigated network resilience and collaboration patterns in drug trafficking networks. The second domain, public health, focused on the social networks and social support of people who use drugs. Finally, the third domain focused on the collaboration networks of policy, law enforcement, and service providers. Future illicit drugs research using whole network SNA should include more diverse data sources and samples, incorporate mixed and qualitative methods, and apply social network analysis to study drug policy.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Sociometric or whole network analysis, a method used to analyze relational patterns among social actors, emphasizes the role of social structure in shaping behaviour. Such method has been applied to many aspects of illicit drug research, including in the areas of public health, epidemiology, and criminology. Previous reviews about social networks and drugs have lacked a focus on the use of sociometric network analysis for illicit drugs research across disciplines. The current scoping review aimed to provide an overview of the sociometric network analysis methods used in illicit drugs research and to assess how such methods could be used for future research.
METHODS
A systematic search of six databases (Web of Science, ProQuest Sociology Collection, Political Science Complete, PubMed, Criminal Justice Abstracts, and PsycINFO) returned 72 relevant studies that met the inclusion criteria. To be included, studies had to mention illicit drugs and use whole social network analysis as one of their methods. Studies were summarized quantitatively and qualitatively using a data-charting form and a description of the studies' main topics.
RESULTS
Sociometric network analysis in illicit drugs research has grown in popularity in the last decade, using mostly descriptive network metrics, such as degree centrality (72.2%) and density (44.4%). Studies were found to belong to three study domains. The first, drug crimes investigated network resilience and collaboration patterns in drug trafficking networks. The second domain, public health, focused on the social networks and social support of people who use drugs. Finally, the third domain focused on the collaboration networks of policy, law enforcement, and service providers.
CONCLUSION
Future illicit drugs research using whole network SNA should include more diverse data sources and samples, incorporate mixed and qualitative methods, and apply social network analysis to study drug policy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36848370
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282340
pii: PONE-D-22-18052
pmc: PMC9970099
doi:
Substances chimiques
Illicit Drugs
0
Types de publication
Review
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0282340Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2023 Zakimi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Am J Epidemiol. 2017 Oct 15;186(8):970-978
pubmed: 28535162
AIDS Behav. 2014 Sep;18(9):1753-63
pubmed: 24849621
Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2021 Oct;35(5):526-533
pubmed: 34561069
J Sch Health. 2016 May;86(5):322-33
pubmed: 27040470
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Nov 19;18(1):143
pubmed: 30453902
Health Info Libr J. 2009 Jun;26(2):91-108
pubmed: 19490148
Implement Sci. 2010 Sep 20;5:69
pubmed: 20854677
Epidemics. 2021 Mar;34:100426
pubmed: 33341667
Prev Med. 2020 Jan;130:105900
pubmed: 31733224
Addiction. 2015 Apr;110(4):627-35
pubmed: 25510264
Soc Networks. 2021 Jan;64:16-28
pubmed: 32921897
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2020 Jun 26;272:5-8
pubmed: 32604586
Lancet. 2012 Jan 7;379(9810):55-70
pubmed: 22225671
Int J Drug Policy. 2018 Jan;51:95-104
pubmed: 29227844
Am J Public Health. 1997 Aug;87(8):1289-96
pubmed: 9279263
AIDS Behav. 2013 Sep;17(7):2341-51
pubmed: 23184464
Subst Use Misuse. 2012 Apr;47(5):474-90
pubmed: 22428816
J Subst Abuse. 2001;13(1-2):89-102
pubmed: 11547627
Addict Health. 2015 Winter-Spring;7(1-2):1-13
pubmed: 26322205
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 29;11(1):e0147248
pubmed: 26824351
AIDS Behav. 2014 Feb;18(2):419-41
pubmed: 23921582
Subst Use Misuse. 2013 Dec;48(14):1485-97
pubmed: 23819740
Int J Drug Policy. 2020 Oct;84:102797
pubmed: 32763755
AIDS Behav. 2017 Apr;21(4):1183-1207
pubmed: 27125244
Int J Drug Policy. 2018 Jun;56:92-100
pubmed: 29621742
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 03;9(7):e101047
pubmed: 24992659
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021 May 1;222:108681
pubmed: 33757711
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020 May 23;213:108078
pubmed: 32485658
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473
pubmed: 30178033
J Urban Health. 2019 Feb;96(1):27-37
pubmed: 30465260
AIDS Behav. 2014 Mar;18(3):505-10
pubmed: 24469223
World J AIDS. 2013 Mar 1;3(1):1-9
pubmed: 24672745
J Rural Health. 2017 Apr;33(2):198-207
pubmed: 27171488
Soc Sci Med. 2012 May;74(10):1602-9
pubmed: 22465379
Sci Total Environ. 2013 Oct 1;463-464:1079-92
pubmed: 22726813
J Public Health (Oxf). 2013 Sep;35(3):453-9
pubmed: 23564840
Harm Reduct J. 2015 Oct 16;12:30
pubmed: 26470863
Harm Reduct J. 2022 May 19;19(1):48
pubmed: 35590421
Addiction. 2007 Nov;102(11):1730-9
pubmed: 17935581