Moralization and self-control strategy selection.

Attention Distraction Moralization Self-control Strategy

Journal

Psychonomic bulletin & review
ISSN: 1531-5320
Titre abrégé: Psychon Bull Rev
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9502924

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Aug 2023
Historique:
accepted: 12 02 2023
medline: 7 9 2023
pubmed: 1 3 2023
entrez: 28 2 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To manage conflicts between temptation and commitment, people use self-control. The process model of self-control outlines different strategies for managing the onset and experience of temptation. However, little is known about the decision-making factors underlying strategy selection. Across three experiments (N = 317), we tested whether the moral valence of a commitment predicts how people advise attentional self-control strategies. In Experiments 1 and 2, people rated attentional focus strategies as significantly more effective for people tempted to break moral relative to immoral commitments, even when controlling for perceived temptation and trait self-control. Experiment 3 showed that as people perceived commitments to have more positive moral valence, they judged attentional focus strategies to be significantly more effective relative to attentional distraction strategies. Moreover, this effect was partly mediated by perceived differences in motivation. These results indicate that moralization informs decision-making processes related to self-control strategy selection.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36849699
doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02257-7
pii: 10.3758/s13423-023-02257-7
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1586-1595

Informations de copyright

© 2023. The Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Références

Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
Bermúdez, J. P. (2021). The skill of self-control. Synthese, 199, 6251–6273.
doi: 10.1007/s11229-021-03068-w pubmed: 34970004 pmcid: 8668847
Bermúdez, J. P., Murray, S., Chartrand, L., & Barbosa, S. (in press). What’s inside is all that counts? The contours of everyday thinking about self-control. Review of Philosophy and Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-021-00573-2
Bonanno, G. A., & Burton, C. L. (2013). Regulatory flexibility: An individual differences perspective on coping and emotion regulation. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(6), 591–612.
doi: 10.1177/1745691613504116 pubmed: 26173226
Decety, J., & Cacioppo, S. (2012). The speed of morality: A high-density electrical neuroimaging study. Journal of Neurophysiology, 108(11), 3068–3072.
doi: 10.1152/jn.00473.2012 pubmed: 22956794
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2012). Motivation, personality, and development within embedded social contexts: An overview of self-determination theory. In R. M. Ryan (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of human motivation (pp. 85–107). Oxford University Press.
doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195399820.013.0006
Duckworth, A. L., Gendler, T. S., & Gross, J. J. (2016). Situational strategies for self-control. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11(1), 35–55.
doi: 10.1177/1745691615623247 pubmed: 26817725 pmcid: 4736542
Duckworth, A. L., & Gross, J. J. (2014). Self-control and grit: Related but separable determinants of success. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(5), 319–325.
doi: 10.1177/0963721414541462 pubmed: 26855479 pmcid: 4737958
Duckworth, A. L., Milkman, K. L., & Laibson, D. (2018). Beyond willpower: Strategies for reducing failures of self-control. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 19(3), 102–129.
doi: 10.1177/1529100618821893 pubmed: 30760176
Duckworth, A. L., Taxer, J. L., Eskreis-Winkler, L., Galla, B. M., & Gross, J. J. (2019). Self-control and academic achievement. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 373–399.
doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-103230 pubmed: 30609915
Ent, M. R., Baumeister, R. F., & Tice, D. M. (2015). Trait self-control and the avoidance of temptation. Personality and Individual Differences, 74, 12–15.
doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2014.09.031
Etzioni, A. (1961). A comparative analysis of complex organizations. Free Press.
Feltz, S., & Feltz, A. (2019). The knowledge of animals as food scale. Human–Animal Interaction Bulletin, 7, 19–45.
Fujita, K., Trope, Y., Liberman, N., & Levin-Sagi, M. (2006). Construal levels and self-control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(3), 351–367.
doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.90.3.351 pubmed: 16594824 pmcid: 3153425
Galla, B. M., & Duckworth, A. L. (2015). More than resisting temptation: Beneficial habits mediate the relationship between self-control and positive life outcomes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(3), 508–525.
doi: 10.1037/pspp0000026 pubmed: 25643222 pmcid: 4731333
Gantman, A., Devraj-Kizuk, S., Mende-Siedlecki, P., Van Bavel, J. J., & Mathewson, K. E. (2020). The time course of moral perception: An ERP investigation of the moral pop-out effect. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 15(2), 235–246.
doi: 10.1093/scan/nsaa030 pubmed: 32364227 pmcid: 7304512
Gantman, A. P., & Van Bavel, J. J. (2014). The moral pop-out effect: enhanced perceptual awareness of morally relevant stimuli. Cognition, 132, 22–29.
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.02.007 pubmed: 24747444
Gruen, L. (2012). Ethics and animals. Cambridge University Press.
Guay, F., Vallerand, R. J., & Blanchard, C. (2000). On the assessment of situational intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The Situational Motivation Scale (SIMS). Motivation and Emotion, 24(3), 175–213.
doi: 10.1023/A:1005614228250
Gui, D. Y., Gan, T., & Liu, C. (2016). Neural evidence for moral intuition and the temporal dynamics of interactions between emotional processes and moral cognition. Social Neuroscience, 11, 380–394.
doi: 10.1080/17470919.2015.1081401 pubmed: 26286634
Henrich, J. (2020). The WEIRDest People in the world. Farrar, Straus, & Giroux.
Hofmann, W., Baumeister, R. F., Förster, G., & Vohs, K. D. (2012). Everyday temptations: An experience sampling study of desire, conflict, and self-control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(6), 1318–1335.
doi: 10.1037/a0026545 pubmed: 22149456
Inzlicht, M., Shenhav, A., & Olivola, C. (2018). The effort paradox: Effort is both costly and valued. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(4), 337–349.
doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2018.01.007 pubmed: 29477776 pmcid: 6172040
Jalil, A. J., Tasoff, J., & Bustamante, A. V. (2020). Eating to save the planet: Evidence from a randomized controlled trial using individual-level food purchase data. Food Policy, 95, 101950.
doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2020.101950
Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations. Wiley.
Klinger, J. A., Scholer, A. A., Hui, C. M., & Molden, D. C. (2018). Effortful experiences of self-control foster lay theories that self-control is limited. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 78, 1–13. 10.1016/j.jesp.2018.04.006
Knittle, K., Heino, M., Marques, M. M., Stenius, M., Beattie, M., Ehbrecht, F., Hagger, M. S., Hardeman, W., & Hankonen, N. (2020). The compendium of self-enactable techniques to change and self-manage motivation and behaviour v.1.0. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(2), 215–223.
doi: 10.1038/s41562-019-0798-9 pubmed: 31932687
Kool, W., & Botvinick, M. (2018). Mental labour. Nature Human. Behaviour, 2(12), 899–908.
Kotabe, H. P., & Hofmann, W. (2015). On integrating the components of self-control. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(5), 618–638.
doi: 10.1177/1745691615593382 pubmed: 26386000
Lipkus, I. M., Mays, D., Sheeran, P., Pan, W., Cameron, L., & De Brigard, F. (2022). Effects of mental simulation of future waterpipe tobacco smoking on attitudes, perceived harms, and intended use among young adults. Journal of Behavioral Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-021-00245-7
Martijn, C., Tenbült, P., Merckelbach, H., Dreezens, E., & Vries, N. K. (2002). Getting a grip on ourselves: Challenging expectancies about loss of energy after self-control. Social Cognition, 20, 441–446.
doi: 10.1521/soco.20.6.441.22978
Milyavskaya, M., Saunders, B., & Inzlicht, M. (2021). Self-control in daily life: Prevalence and effectiveness of diverse self-control strategies. Journal of Personality, 89(4), 634–651.
doi: 10.1111/jopy.12604 pubmed: 33128774
Rhee, J. J., Schein, C., & Bastian, B. (2019). The what, how, and why of moralization: A review of current definitions, methods, and evidence in moralization research. Social and Personality Psychology. Compass, 13(12), e12511.
Rosas, A., Bermúdez, J. P., & Cabrera, J. A. G. (2018). Is a bad will a weak will? Cognitive dispositions modulate folk attributions of weakness of will. Philosophical Explorations, 21(3), 350–363.
doi: 10.1080/13869795.2018.1457709
Rozin, P., Haidt, J., & McCauley, C. R. (1993). Disgust. In M. Lewis & J. M. Haviland (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (pp. 575–594). Guilford Press.
Rozin, P., Markwith, M., & Stoess, C. (1997). Moralization and becoming a vegetarian: The transformation of preferences into values and the recruitment of disgust. Psychological Science, 8(2), 67–73.
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00685.x
Tangney, J. P., Baumeister, R. F., & Boone, A. L. (2004). High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. Journal of Personality, 72, 271–322.
doi: 10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00263.x pubmed: 15016066
Wente, A., Zhao, X., Gopnik, A., Kang, C., & Kushnir, T. (2020). The developmental and cultural origins of our beliefs about self-control. In A. Mele (Ed.), Surrounding self-control. Oxford University Press.
Wenzel, M., Bürgler, S., Brandstätter, V., Kreibich, A., & Hennecke, M. (2022). Self-regulatory strategy use, efficacy, and strategy-situation-fit in self-control conflicts of initiation, persistence, and inhibition [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/p748g
Wieber, F., Sezer, L. A., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2014). Asking "why" helps action control by goals but not plans. Motivation and Emotion, 38(1), 65–78.
doi: 10.1007/s11031-013-9364-3
Yang, Q., Li, A., Xiao, X., Zhang, Y., & Tian, X. (2014). Dissociation between morality and disgust: An event-related potential study. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 94, 84–91.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2014.07.008 pubmed: 25084130
Yang, Q., Luo, C., & Zhang, Y. (2017). Individual differences in the early recognition of moral information in lexical processing: An event-related potential study. Scientific Reports, 7otential study. Scientific Reports, 7, Article 1475. Article 1475.
Zhang, Z., & Yuan, K.-H. (Eds.). (2018). Practical statistical power analysis using WebPower and R. ISDSA Press.
Zhu, R., Wu, H., Xu, Z., Tang, H., Shen, X., Mai, X., & Liu, C. (2019). Early distinction between shame and guilt processing in an interpersonal context. Social Neuroscience, 14, 53–66.
doi: 10.1080/17470919.2017.1391119 pubmed: 29016239

Auteurs

Samuel Murray (S)

Department of Philosophy, Providence College, Providence, RI, USA. smurray7@providence.edu.
Neuroscience Program, Providence College, Providence, RI, USA. smurray7@providence.edu.

Juan Pablo Bermúdez (JP)

Dyson School of Design Engineering, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Programa de Filosofía & Área de Investigación Salud, Conocimiento Médico y Sociedad, Universidad Externado de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia.

Felipe De Brigard (F)

Department of Philosophy, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH