Mental health professionals and telehealth in a rural setting: a cross sectional survey.
COVID-19 pandemic
IAPT
Psychological therapies
Rural health
Telehealth
Telemedicine
United Kingdom
Journal
BMC health services research
ISSN: 1472-6963
Titre abrégé: BMC Health Serv Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088677
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 Feb 2023
27 Feb 2023
Historique:
received:
14
11
2022
accepted:
18
01
2023
entrez:
28
2
2023
pubmed:
1
3
2023
medline:
3
3
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Telehealth usage has been promoted in all settings but has been identified as a panacea to issues of access and equity in the rural context. However, uptake and widespread integration of telehealth across all parts of the health system has been slow, with a myriad of barriers documented, including in rural settings. The crisis of the COVID-19 pandemic, saw barriers rapidly overturned with the unprecedented and exponential rise in telehealth usage. The uniqueness of the crisis forced telehealth adoption, but as the urgency stabilises, pandemic learnings must be captured, utilised, and built upon in a post-pandemic world. The aim of this study was to document staff experiences and perceptions of delivering rural psychological therapies via telehealth during the pandemic and to capture learnings for future rural telehealth delivery. An online cross-sectional survey that explored mental health professional's experiences, use, and perceptions of telehealth before and after pandemic-enforced changes to service delivery. Sixty-two respondents completed the questionnaire (response rate 68%). Both the delivery of telehealth via telephone and online video conferencing significantly increased during the pandemic (66% vs 98%, p < .001 for telephone and 10% vs 89%, p < 0.001 for online video). Respondents indicated that client's access to services and attendance had improved with telehealth use but their attention and focus during sessions and non-verbal communication had been negatively affected. The challenges for older adults, people with learning and sensory disabilities, and residents in remote areas with poorer mobile/internet connectivity were identified. Despite these challenges, none of the respondents indicated a preference to return to fully face-to-face service delivery with most (86%) preferring to deliver psychological therapies fully or mostly via telehealth. This study addresses three major gaps in knowledge: the experience of delivering local telehealth solutions to address rural mental health needs, the provision of strong rural-specific telehealth recommendations, and the dearth of rural research emanating from the United Kingdom. As the world settles into a living with COVID-19 era, the uniqueness of the rural telehealth context may be forgotten as urban myopia continues to dominate telehealth policy and uptake. It is critical that rural resourcing and digital connectivity are addressed.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Telehealth usage has been promoted in all settings but has been identified as a panacea to issues of access and equity in the rural context. However, uptake and widespread integration of telehealth across all parts of the health system has been slow, with a myriad of barriers documented, including in rural settings. The crisis of the COVID-19 pandemic, saw barriers rapidly overturned with the unprecedented and exponential rise in telehealth usage. The uniqueness of the crisis forced telehealth adoption, but as the urgency stabilises, pandemic learnings must be captured, utilised, and built upon in a post-pandemic world. The aim of this study was to document staff experiences and perceptions of delivering rural psychological therapies via telehealth during the pandemic and to capture learnings for future rural telehealth delivery.
METHODS
METHODS
An online cross-sectional survey that explored mental health professional's experiences, use, and perceptions of telehealth before and after pandemic-enforced changes to service delivery.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Sixty-two respondents completed the questionnaire (response rate 68%). Both the delivery of telehealth via telephone and online video conferencing significantly increased during the pandemic (66% vs 98%, p < .001 for telephone and 10% vs 89%, p < 0.001 for online video). Respondents indicated that client's access to services and attendance had improved with telehealth use but their attention and focus during sessions and non-verbal communication had been negatively affected. The challenges for older adults, people with learning and sensory disabilities, and residents in remote areas with poorer mobile/internet connectivity were identified. Despite these challenges, none of the respondents indicated a preference to return to fully face-to-face service delivery with most (86%) preferring to deliver psychological therapies fully or mostly via telehealth.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
This study addresses three major gaps in knowledge: the experience of delivering local telehealth solutions to address rural mental health needs, the provision of strong rural-specific telehealth recommendations, and the dearth of rural research emanating from the United Kingdom. As the world settles into a living with COVID-19 era, the uniqueness of the rural telehealth context may be forgotten as urban myopia continues to dominate telehealth policy and uptake. It is critical that rural resourcing and digital connectivity are addressed.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36849933
doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09083-6
pii: 10.1186/s12913-023-09083-6
pmc: PMC9970689
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
200Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Aust J Rural Health. 2022 Aug;30(4):544-549
pubmed: 35612267
Int J Audiol. 2019 Jul;58(7):381-392
pubmed: 30987477
Lancet. 2018 Feb 17;391(10121):679-686
pubmed: 29224931
Front Public Health. 2021 Feb 26;9:648009
pubmed: 33718325
Int Rev Psychiatry. 2011 Aug;23(4):318-27
pubmed: 22026487
Tex Med. 2018 Feb 1;114(2):28-32
pubmed: 29393963
J Ment Health. 2016 Oct;25(5):410-415
pubmed: 26635236
BMC Psychiatry. 2018 Aug 16;18(1):260
pubmed: 30115041
Psychiatr Serv. 2020 May 1;71(5):419-426
pubmed: 31996115
BJPsych Open. 2021 Jul 26;7(4):e139
pubmed: 34308824
Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Oct;7(10):883-892
pubmed: 32707037
Psychiatr Serv. 2020 Nov 1;71(11):1143-1150
pubmed: 32933411
Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2019 Mar;40(3):233-239
pubmed: 30508400
Prim Care. 2022 Dec;49(4):517-530
pubmed: 36357058
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2019 Aug 8;266:174-182
pubmed: 31397320
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2019;30(4):1259-1272
pubmed: 31680097
Behav Cogn Psychother. 2014 Nov;42(6):747-59
pubmed: 24382088
J Affect Disord. 2020 Dec 1;277:55-64
pubmed: 32799105
Cogn Behav Therap. 2020 Apr 28;13:e12
pubmed: 32454891
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2022 Aug 19;16(1):43
pubmed: 35986332
J Oncol Pract. 2018 Jul;14(7):e429-e437
pubmed: 29996068
Matern Child Health J. 2019 Sep;23(9):1196-1205
pubmed: 31228142
Psychiatr Serv. 2019 Mar 1;70(3):239-242
pubmed: 30554561
Rural Remote Health. 2019 Mar;19(1):4710
pubmed: 30884951
Br J Clin Psychol. 2021 Mar;60(1):1-37
pubmed: 32578231
Psychooncology. 2022 Oct;31(10):1660-1670
pubmed: 35971265
Hosp Top. 2019 Jul-Sep;97(3):107-118
pubmed: 31244391
Aust Health Rev. 2010 Aug;34(3):276-81
pubmed: 20797357
Psychol Serv. 2013 Aug;10(3):289-297
pubmed: 22924798
BMJ. 2021 Sep 17;374:n2214
pubmed: 34535467
BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 3;7(8):e016242
pubmed: 28775188
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 23;16(11):e0258839
pubmed: 34813618
Aust J Rural Health. 2019 Oct;27(5):419-426
pubmed: 31571313
J Adv Nurs. 2014 Jan;70(1):21-33
pubmed: 23786584
Restor Dent Endod. 2017 May;42(2):152-155
pubmed: 28503482
Australas Psychiatry. 2016 Oct;24(5):489-92
pubmed: 27034440
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 06;19(11):
pubmed: 35682512
J Nurse Pract. 2021 Feb;17(2):218-221
pubmed: 33106751
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2022 Jul;49(4):530-538
pubmed: 34846613
J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2020 Jul 23;7:2382120520943595
pubmed: 32754648