A deep learning approach for fully automated cardiac shape modeling in tetralogy of Fallot.

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) Congenital heart disease Deep learning Image segmentation Shape modeling

Journal

Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
ISSN: 1532-429X
Titre abrégé: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9815616

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
27 02 2023
Historique:
received: 18 10 2022
accepted: 25 01 2023
entrez: 28 2 2023
pubmed: 1 3 2023
medline: 3 3 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Cardiac shape modeling is a useful computational tool that has provided quantitative insights into the mechanisms underlying dysfunction in heart disease. The manual input and time required to make cardiac shape models, however, limits their clinical utility. Here we present an end-to-end pipeline that uses deep learning for automated view classification, slice selection, phase selection, anatomical landmark localization, and myocardial image segmentation for the automated generation of three-dimensional, biventricular shape models. With this approach, we aim to make cardiac shape modeling a more robust and broadly applicable tool that has processing times consistent with clinical workflows. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) images from a cohort of 123 patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot (rTOF) from two internal sites were used to train and validate each step in the automated pipeline. The complete automated pipeline was tested using CMR images from a cohort of 12 rTOF patients from an internal site and 18 rTOF patients from an external site. Manually and automatically generated shape models from the test set were compared using Euclidean projection distances, global ventricular measurements, and atlas-based shape mode scores. The mean absolute error (MAE) between manually and automatically generated shape models in the test set was similar to the voxel resolution of the original CMR images for end-diastolic models (MAE = 1.9 ± 0.5 mm) and end-systolic models (MAE = 2.1 ± 0.7 mm). Global ventricular measurements computed from automated models were in good agreement with those computed from manual models. The average mean absolute difference in shape mode Z-score between manually and automatically generated models was 0.5 standard deviations for the first 20 modes of a reference statistical shape atlas. Using deep learning, accurate three-dimensional, biventricular shape models can be reliably created. This fully automated end-to-end approach dramatically reduces the manual input required to create shape models, thereby enabling the rapid analysis of large-scale datasets and the potential to deploy statistical atlas-based analyses in point-of-care clinical settings. Training data and networks are available from cardiacatlas.org.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Cardiac shape modeling is a useful computational tool that has provided quantitative insights into the mechanisms underlying dysfunction in heart disease. The manual input and time required to make cardiac shape models, however, limits their clinical utility. Here we present an end-to-end pipeline that uses deep learning for automated view classification, slice selection, phase selection, anatomical landmark localization, and myocardial image segmentation for the automated generation of three-dimensional, biventricular shape models. With this approach, we aim to make cardiac shape modeling a more robust and broadly applicable tool that has processing times consistent with clinical workflows.
METHODS
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) images from a cohort of 123 patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot (rTOF) from two internal sites were used to train and validate each step in the automated pipeline. The complete automated pipeline was tested using CMR images from a cohort of 12 rTOF patients from an internal site and 18 rTOF patients from an external site. Manually and automatically generated shape models from the test set were compared using Euclidean projection distances, global ventricular measurements, and atlas-based shape mode scores.
RESULTS
The mean absolute error (MAE) between manually and automatically generated shape models in the test set was similar to the voxel resolution of the original CMR images for end-diastolic models (MAE = 1.9 ± 0.5 mm) and end-systolic models (MAE = 2.1 ± 0.7 mm). Global ventricular measurements computed from automated models were in good agreement with those computed from manual models. The average mean absolute difference in shape mode Z-score between manually and automatically generated models was 0.5 standard deviations for the first 20 modes of a reference statistical shape atlas.
CONCLUSIONS
Using deep learning, accurate three-dimensional, biventricular shape models can be reliably created. This fully automated end-to-end approach dramatically reduces the manual input required to create shape models, thereby enabling the rapid analysis of large-scale datasets and the potential to deploy statistical atlas-based analyses in point-of-care clinical settings. Training data and networks are available from cardiacatlas.org.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36849960
doi: 10.1186/s12968-023-00924-1
pii: 10.1186/s12968-023-00924-1
pmc: PMC9969707
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

15

Subventions

Organisme : Wellcome Trust
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : R01 HL121754
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : T32 HL105373
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

© 2023. The Author(s).

Références

JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010 Aug;3(8):860-6
pubmed: 20705268
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2021 Dec 13;379(2212):20200257
pubmed: 34689630
Med Image Anal. 2015 Dec;26(1):133-45
pubmed: 26387054
Bioinformatics. 2011 Aug 15;27(16):2288-95
pubmed: 21737439
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2022 Aug 4;24(1):46
pubmed: 35922806
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017 Feb 3;19(1):18
pubmed: 28178995
Prog Pediatr Cardiol. 2016 Dec;43:61-69
pubmed: 28082823
Cardiooncology. 2020 Aug 08;6:13
pubmed: 32782827
Pediatr Cardiol. 2013 Jan;34(1):95-104
pubmed: 22669402
IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2018 Apr;40(4):834-848
pubmed: 28463186
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2020 Mar 05;7:25
pubmed: 32195270
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2019 Sep;38(9):2151-2164
pubmed: 30676949
BMC Med Imaging. 2010 Jan 11;10:1
pubmed: 20064248
Radiology. 2000 Aug;216(2):597-602
pubmed: 10924592
Sci Rep. 2023 Feb 9;13(1):2335
pubmed: 36759522
Sci Rep. 2019 Feb 4;9(1):1130
pubmed: 30718635
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Jan 21;8:807728
pubmed: 35127868
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2021 Oct 7;23(1):105
pubmed: 34615541
Europace. 2021 Mar 4;23(23 Suppl 1):i88-i95
pubmed: 33751079
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2017 Jan 17;22(2):503-515
pubmed: 28103561
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2019 Jul 18;21(1):41
pubmed: 31315625
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2018 Jul;2018:596-599
pubmed: 30440467
Med Image Anal. 2016 Oct;33:38-43
pubmed: 27349830
Comput Biol Med. 2021 Jun;133:104373
pubmed: 33857775
Nat Methods. 2021 Feb;18(2):203-211
pubmed: 33288961
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Jul;13(7):596-604
pubmed: 22194094
Med Image Anal. 2017 Dec;42:60-88
pubmed: 28778026
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2014 Jul 30;16:56
pubmed: 25160814
J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2018 Apr;11(2):123-132
pubmed: 29294215
Magn Reson Med. 2019 May;81(5):3283-3291
pubmed: 30714197
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022 Sep;15(9):1563-1574
pubmed: 35033494
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2017 Jul;37(4):413-420
pubmed: 26577068
Radiol Artif Intell. 2021 Jul 14;3(5):e200197
pubmed: 34617022
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Mar;34(3):407-417
pubmed: 28856524
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2021 Dec;40(12):3543-3554
pubmed: 34138702
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Jan 21;8:806107
pubmed: 35127866

Auteurs

Sachin Govil (S)

Department of Bioengineering, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, MC 0412, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0412, USA.

Brendan T Crabb (BT)

Department of Bioengineering, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, MC 0412, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0412, USA.

Yu Deng (Y)

Department of Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, UK.

Laura Dal Toso (L)

Department of Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, UK.

Esther Puyol-Antón (E)

Department of Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, UK.

Kuberan Pushparajah (K)

Department of Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, UK.

Sanjeet Hegde (S)

Department of Pediatrics, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Division of Cardiology, Rady Children's Hospital San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.

James C Perry (JC)

Department of Pediatrics, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Division of Cardiology, Rady Children's Hospital San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.

Jeffrey H Omens (JH)

Department of Bioengineering, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, MC 0412, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0412, USA.

Albert Hsiao (A)

Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.

Alistair A Young (AA)

Department of Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, UK.

Andrew D McCulloch (AD)

Department of Bioengineering, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, MC 0412, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0412, USA. amcculloch@ucsd.edu.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH