Measurement properties of PROMIS short forms for pain and function in patients receiving knee arthroplasty.
Function
Knee arthroplasty
Minimal important change
PROMIS
Pain
Psychometric validation
Responsiveness
Short forms
Journal
Journal of patient-reported outcomes
ISSN: 2509-8020
Titre abrégé: J Patient Rep Outcomes
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101722688
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 02 2023
28 02 2023
Historique:
received:
30
05
2022
accepted:
10
02
2023
entrez:
1
3
2023
pubmed:
2
3
2023
medline:
2
3
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
While there are a few studies on measurement properties of PROMIS short forms for pain and function in patients with knee osteoarthritis, nothing is known about the measurement properties in patients with knee arthroplasty. Therefore, this study examined the measurement properties of the German Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) short forms for pain intensity (PAIN), pain interference (PI) and physical function (PF) in knee arthroplasty patients. Short forms were collected from consecutive patients of our clinic's knee arthroplasty registry before and 12 months post-surgery. Oxford Knee Score (OKS) was the reference measure. A subsample completed the short forms twice to test reliability. Construct validity and responsiveness were assessed using scale-specific hypothesis testing. For reliability, Cronbach's alpha, intraclass correlation coefficients, and agreement using standard error of measurement (SEM Of 213 eligible patients, 155 received questionnaires, 143 returned baseline questionnaires and 119, 12-month questionnaires. Correlations of short forms with OKS were large (│r│ ≥ 0.7) with slightly lower values for PAIN, and specifically for men. Cronbach's alpha values were ≥ 0.84 and intraclass correlation coefficients ≥ 0.90. SEM Our results partly support the use of the investigated short forms for knee arthroplasty patients. The ability of PF to differentiate between patients with high perceived recovery is limited. Therefore, the advantages and disadvantages should be strongly considered within the context of the intended use.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
While there are a few studies on measurement properties of PROMIS short forms for pain and function in patients with knee osteoarthritis, nothing is known about the measurement properties in patients with knee arthroplasty. Therefore, this study examined the measurement properties of the German Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) short forms for pain intensity (PAIN), pain interference (PI) and physical function (PF) in knee arthroplasty patients.
METHODS
Short forms were collected from consecutive patients of our clinic's knee arthroplasty registry before and 12 months post-surgery. Oxford Knee Score (OKS) was the reference measure. A subsample completed the short forms twice to test reliability. Construct validity and responsiveness were assessed using scale-specific hypothesis testing. For reliability, Cronbach's alpha, intraclass correlation coefficients, and agreement using standard error of measurement (SEM
RESULTS
Of 213 eligible patients, 155 received questionnaires, 143 returned baseline questionnaires and 119, 12-month questionnaires. Correlations of short forms with OKS were large (│r│ ≥ 0.7) with slightly lower values for PAIN, and specifically for men. Cronbach's alpha values were ≥ 0.84 and intraclass correlation coefficients ≥ 0.90. SEM
CONCLUSION
Our results partly support the use of the investigated short forms for knee arthroplasty patients. The ability of PF to differentiate between patients with high perceived recovery is limited. Therefore, the advantages and disadvantages should be strongly considered within the context of the intended use.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36854937
doi: 10.1186/s41687-023-00559-x
pii: 10.1186/s41687-023-00559-x
pmc: PMC9975126
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
18Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Qual Life Res. 1995 Aug;4(4):293-307
pubmed: 7550178
Arthritis Rheum. 2007 Dec 15;57(8):1363-7
pubmed: 18050174
J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 May;67(5):516-26
pubmed: 24698295
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Jan;475(1):62-69
pubmed: 27043727
Eur Spine J. 2006 Jan;15(1):66-73
pubmed: 15856340
J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Nov;63(11):1179-94
pubmed: 20685078
Qual Life Res. 2021 Aug;30(8):2197-2218
pubmed: 33818733
J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Jan;60(1):34-42
pubmed: 17161752
J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Dec;68(12):1388-96
pubmed: 25913670
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 Sep;25(9):2736-2742
pubmed: 26519187
J Pain. 2017 Sep;18(9):1096-1110
pubmed: 28501708
J Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Aug;148:48-53
pubmed: 35436522
Qual Life Res. 2021 Oct;30(10):2729-2754
pubmed: 34247326
J Knee Surg. 2023 Jan;36(2):115-120
pubmed: 33992033
BMJ. 2020 Jun 4;369:m1714
pubmed: 32499297
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2009 Jan;17(1):49-52
pubmed: 18602843
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2013 Oct;65(10):1625-33
pubmed: 23592494
Obes Res Clin Pract. 2018 Sep - Oct;12(5):472-478
pubmed: 30007535
J Man Manip Ther. 2009;17(3):163-70
pubmed: 20046623
Pain. 2010 Jul;150(1):173-182
pubmed: 20554116
Pain. 2018 Apr;159(4):775-782
pubmed: 29200181
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015 Sep 14;16:253
pubmed: 26369412
World J Orthop. 2018 Mar 18;9(3):41-49
pubmed: 29564213
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998 Jan;80(1):63-9
pubmed: 9460955
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020 Sep 15;45(18):E1179-E1184
pubmed: 32576778
J Pain. 2014 Jun;15(6):569-85
pubmed: 24787228
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Aug;33(8):2471-2474
pubmed: 29656980
Acta Orthop. 2019 Feb;90(1):74-80
pubmed: 30451046
J Chronic Dis. 1985;38(1):27-36
pubmed: 3972947
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Oct;34(10):2313-2318
pubmed: 31230957
J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Mar;83:90-100
pubmed: 28093262
Qual Life Res. 2013 Nov;22(9):2561-8
pubmed: 23526094
Pain Med. 2016 Feb;17(2):314-24
pubmed: 26814279
Arthroplast Today. 2020 Nov 06;6(4):919-924
pubmed: 33204789
J Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Jan;141:36-45
pubmed: 34464687
Bone Joint J. 2021 Jun;103-B(6):1096-1102
pubmed: 34058868