Assessing Recent Time-Dependent Double-Hybrid Density Functionals on Doublet-Doublet Excitations.


Journal

ACS physical chemistry Au
ISSN: 2694-2445
Titre abrégé: ACS Phys Chem Au
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9918300980006676

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
28 Sep 2022
Historique:
entrez: 1 3 2023
pubmed: 2 3 2023
medline: 2 3 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

This work is the first thorough investigation of time-dependent double-hybrid density functionals (DHDFs) for the calculation of doublet-doublet excitation energies. It sheds light on the current state-of-the-art techniques in the field and clarifies if there is still room for future improvements. Overall, 29 hybrid functionals and DHDFs are investigated. We separately analyze the individual impacts of the Tamm-Dancoff approximation (TDA), range separation, and spin-component/opposite scaling (SCS/SOS) on 45 doublet-doublet excitations in 23 radicals before concluding with an overarching analysis that includes and excludes challenging excitations with double-excitation or multireference character. Our results show again that so-called "nonempirical" DHDFs are outperformed by semiempirical ones. While the best assessed functionals are DHDFs, some of the worst are also DHDFs and outperformed by all assessed hybrids. SCS/SOS is particularly beneficial for range-separated DHDFs. Spin-scaled, range-separated DHDFs paired with the TDA belong to the best tested methods here, and we particularly highlight SCS-ωB2GP-PLYP, SOS-ωB2PLYP, SOS-ωB2GP-PLYP, SOS-ωB88PP86, SOS-RSX-QIDH, and SOS-ωPBEPP86. When comparing our functional rankings with previous studies on singlet-singlet and singlet-triplet excitations, we recommend TDA-SOS-ωB88PP86 and TDA-SOS-ωPBEPP86 as robust methods for excitation energies in general until further improvements have been achieved that surpass the chemical accuracy threshold for challenging open-shell excitations without increasing the computational effort.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36855692
doi: 10.1021/acsphyschemau.2c00014
pmc: PMC9955292
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

407-416

Informations de copyright

© 2022 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Références

J Chem Phys. 2007 Oct 21;127(15):154116
pubmed: 17949141
J Chem Theory Comput. 2022 Jun 14;18(6):3460-3473
pubmed: 35533317
J Chem Theory Comput. 2017 Feb 14;13(2):767-783
pubmed: 28107000
J Chem Theory Comput. 2021 Jul 13;17(7):4211-4224
pubmed: 34152771
J Chem Phys. 2020 Jun 14;152(22):224108
pubmed: 32534543
J Chem Theory Comput. 2019 Mar 12;15(3):1939-1956
pubmed: 30689951
J Chem Phys. 2006 Jan 21;124(3):034108
pubmed: 16438568
J Comput Chem. 2021 May 30;42(14):970-981
pubmed: 33748983
Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2009 Jun 14;11(22):4611-20
pubmed: 19475182
J Chem Phys. 2004 Feb 1;120(5):2105-9
pubmed: 15268348
J Chem Phys. 2004 Nov 22;121(20):9793-802
pubmed: 15549852
J Chem Phys. 2017 May 21;146(19):194108
pubmed: 28527441
J Chem Phys. 2011 Oct 21;135(15):151103
pubmed: 22029290
J Chem Phys. 2011 Jul 14;135(2):024106
pubmed: 21766924
J Chem Theory Comput. 2017 Sep 12;13(9):4307-4323
pubmed: 28763220
J Chem Phys. 2019 May 28;150(20):201102
pubmed: 31153220
J Chem Theory Comput. 2022 Feb 8;18(2):865-882
pubmed: 35023739
J Chem Phys. 2020 Aug 14;153(6):064106
pubmed: 35287444
J Chem Phys. 2004 Apr 1;120(13):5932-7
pubmed: 15267474
J Phys Chem A. 2012 Oct 4;116(39):9783-9
pubmed: 22971224
J Phys Chem A. 2007 Jun 21;111(24):5314-26
pubmed: 17521172
J Chem Theory Comput. 2020 Jun 9;16(6):3720-3736
pubmed: 32379442
J Phys Chem A. 2021 May 13;125(18):4026-4035
pubmed: 33938224
Phys Rev Lett. 2005 Feb 4;94(4):043002
pubmed: 15783554
J Phys Chem A. 2008 Dec 18;112(50):12868-86
pubmed: 18714947
J Chem Phys. 2008 Feb 28;128(8):084106
pubmed: 18315032
J Chem Theory Comput. 2018 Aug 14;14(8):4052-4062
pubmed: 29923721
J Phys Chem A. 2009 Jan 29;113(4):767-76
pubmed: 19102628
J Chem Phys. 2014 Jul 21;141(3):031101
pubmed: 25053294
J Chem Theory Comput. 2021 Feb 9;17(2):927-942
pubmed: 33400872
J Phys Chem A. 2016 Apr 28;120(16):2550-60
pubmed: 27035753
J Chem Theory Comput. 2018 Aug 14;14(8):4360-4379
pubmed: 29966098
J Chem Theory Comput. 2019 Sep 10;15(9):4735-4744
pubmed: 31298850
Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2014 Jun 7;16(21):9904-24
pubmed: 24430168
J Chem Theory Comput. 2020 Mar 10;16(3):1711-1741
pubmed: 31986042
Chemphyschem. 2008 Dec 1;9(17):2467-70
pubmed: 18979490
J Chem Theory Comput. 2021 Aug 10;17(8):5165-5186
pubmed: 34291643
Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2018 Sep 19;20(36):23175-23194
pubmed: 30062343
Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2017 Dec 13;19(48):32184-32215
pubmed: 29110012
Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2011 Apr 14;13(14):6670-88
pubmed: 21384027
J Am Chem Soc. 2004 Mar 31;126(12):4007-16
pubmed: 15038755
J Comput Chem. 2021 Mar 30;42(8):528-533
pubmed: 33415788
J Chem Phys. 2013 Oct 28;139(16):164104
pubmed: 24182001
J Chem Theory Comput. 2011 Oct 11;7(10):3272-7
pubmed: 26598161

Auteurs

Joshua Van Dijk (J)

School of Chemistry, The University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia.

Marcos Casanova-Páez (M)

School of Chemistry, The University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia.
Max-Planck-Institut für Kohlenforschung, Kaiser-Wilhelm Platz 1, 45470 Mülheim an der Ruhr, Germany.

Lars Goerigk (L)

School of Chemistry, The University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia.

Classifications MeSH