Government responses to COVID-19 and impact on GBV services and programmes: comparative analysis of the situation in South Africa, Kenya, Uganda, and Nigeria.
COVID-19 policies
GBV prevention and response
service disruption
sub-Saharan Africa
Journal
Sexual and reproductive health matters
ISSN: 2641-0397
Titre abrégé: Sex Reprod Health Matters
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101743493
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2023
Dec 2023
Historique:
entrez:
1
3
2023
pubmed:
2
3
2023
medline:
4
3
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
As governments impose restrictive policies to contain infectious disease outbreaks, pre-existing gender-based inequalities are often exacerbated, increasing the risk of gender-based violence (GBV). Despite international guidance on the need for continued provision of GBV services during emergencies, governments often de-prioritise GBV services and programmes. We conducted a rapid assessment in South Africa, Kenya, Uganda, and Nigeria to examine the impact of COVID-19 policies on the availability of GBV prevention and response services. The study team interviewed 80 stakeholders representing different GBV services in the four countries. The interviews revealed strikingly similar government mis-steps that disrupted the availability of comprehensive GBV services. In all four countries, the government's failure to exempt the provision of multi-sectoral GBV services from initial lockdown restrictions led to confusion and disrupted the provision of critical GBV services such as clinical management of rape, legal and judicial services, psychosocial services, availability of shelters, and community-based prevention activities. The government's imposition of curfews, stay-at-home orders, and transportation restrictions further diminished access to services. Governments must strengthen currently available GBV prevention and response services and be better prepared for future pandemics. Following international guidelines, governments should deem GBV services as essential from the beginning with clear implementation plans. Governments must invest in community-based solutions and the expansion of digital tools to ensure everyone, especially those likely to be structurally excluded, have access to critical services during an emergency.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36857089
doi: 10.1080/26410397.2023.2168399
pmc: PMC9979981
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2168399Références
Am J Public Health. 2023 Feb;113(2):228-237
pubmed: 36302221
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Mar;6(3):
pubmed: 33687912
Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2021 Feb;75(2):64-66
pubmed: 33225558
Int J Clin Pract. 2021 Mar;75(3):e13824
pubmed: 33159836
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 19;18(22):
pubmed: 34831885
Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Jun;8(6):e760-e761
pubmed: 32330429
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Jul;37(13-14):NP11811-NP11835
pubmed: 33637006
BMJ Open. 2021 Mar 3;11(3):e042749
pubmed: 33658260
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 22;15(4):e0231737
pubmed: 32320405
Confl Health. 2021 Nov 20;15(1):84
pubmed: 34801062