Comparative Effectiveness of FOLFIRINOX Versus Gemcitabine and Nab-paclitaxel in Initially Unresectable Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Population-based Study to Assess Subsequent Surgical Resection and Overall Survival.
Humans
Female
Male
Gemcitabine
Irinotecan
Oxaliplatin
/ adverse effects
Leucovorin
/ therapeutic use
Retrospective Studies
Deoxycytidine
Pancreatic Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Fluorouracil
/ therapeutic use
Paclitaxel
/ therapeutic use
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
/ therapeutic use
Ontario
/ epidemiology
Pancreatic Neoplasms
Pancreatic cancer
population-based
surgical resection
Journal
Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain))
ISSN: 1433-2981
Titre abrégé: Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9002902
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 2023
05 2023
Historique:
received:
20
01
2022
revised:
22
12
2022
accepted:
10
02
2023
medline:
11
4
2023
pubmed:
3
3
2023
entrez:
2
3
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
First-line FOLFIRINOX (FOLinic acid, Fluorouracil, IRINotecan, and OXaliplatin) and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) have been publicly funded for patients with unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer (uLAPC) in Ontario, Canada. We examined the overall survival and surgical resection rate after first-line FOLFIRINOX or GnP and determined the association between resection and overall survival in patients with uLAPC. We conducted a retrospective population-based study including patients with uLAPC who received first-line treatment FOLFIRINOX or GnP from April 2015 to March 2019. The cohort was linked to administrative databases to ascertain demographic and clinical characteristics. Propensity score methods were used to balance differences between FOLFIRINOX and GnP. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate overall survival. Cox regression was used to determine the association between receipt of treatment and overall survival, adjusting for time-dependent surgical resections. We identified 723 patients with uLAPC (mean age = 65.8, 43.5% female) who received FOLFIRINOX (55.2%) or GnP (44.8%). The median overall survival and 1-year overall survival probability were higher for FOLFIRINOX (13.7 months, 54.6%) than for GnP (8.7 months, 34.0%). Post-chemotherapy surgical resection occurred in 89 (12.3%) patients (FOLFIRINOX: 74 [18.5%] versus GnP: 15 [4.6%]), with no difference in survival since surgery between FOLFIRINOX and GnP (P = 0.29). After adjusting time-dependent post-treatment surgical resection, FOLFIRINOX (inverse probability treatment weighting hazard ratio 0.72, 95% confidence interval 0.61, 0.84) was independently associated with improved overall survival. In this real-world population-based study of patients with uLAPC, FOLFIRINOX was associated with improved survival and higher resection rates. FOLFIRINOX was associated with improved survival in patients with uLAPC after accounting for the effect of post-chemotherapy surgical resection, suggesting the benefit of FOLFIRINOX was not solely due to improving resectability.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36863956
pii: S0936-6555(23)00055-9
doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2023.02.008
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Gemcitabine
0
Irinotecan
7673326042
130-nm albumin-bound paclitaxel
0
Oxaliplatin
04ZR38536J
Leucovorin
Q573I9DVLP
Deoxycytidine
0W860991D6
Fluorouracil
U3P01618RT
Paclitaxel
P88XT4IS4D
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e303-e311Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.