Comparative Effectiveness of FOLFIRINOX Versus Gemcitabine and Nab-paclitaxel in Initially Unresectable Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Population-based Study to Assess Subsequent Surgical Resection and Overall Survival.


Journal

Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain))
ISSN: 1433-2981
Titre abrégé: Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9002902

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 2023
Historique:
received: 20 01 2022
revised: 22 12 2022
accepted: 10 02 2023
medline: 11 4 2023
pubmed: 3 3 2023
entrez: 2 3 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

First-line FOLFIRINOX (FOLinic acid, Fluorouracil, IRINotecan, and OXaliplatin) and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) have been publicly funded for patients with unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer (uLAPC) in Ontario, Canada. We examined the overall survival and surgical resection rate after first-line FOLFIRINOX or GnP and determined the association between resection and overall survival in patients with uLAPC. We conducted a retrospective population-based study including patients with uLAPC who received first-line treatment FOLFIRINOX or GnP from April 2015 to March 2019. The cohort was linked to administrative databases to ascertain demographic and clinical characteristics. Propensity score methods were used to balance differences between FOLFIRINOX and GnP. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate overall survival. Cox regression was used to determine the association between receipt of treatment and overall survival, adjusting for time-dependent surgical resections. We identified 723 patients with uLAPC (mean age = 65.8, 43.5% female) who received FOLFIRINOX (55.2%) or GnP (44.8%). The median overall survival and 1-year overall survival probability were higher for FOLFIRINOX (13.7 months, 54.6%) than for GnP (8.7 months, 34.0%). Post-chemotherapy surgical resection occurred in 89 (12.3%) patients (FOLFIRINOX: 74 [18.5%] versus GnP: 15 [4.6%]), with no difference in survival since surgery between FOLFIRINOX and GnP (P = 0.29). After adjusting time-dependent post-treatment surgical resection, FOLFIRINOX (inverse probability treatment weighting hazard ratio 0.72, 95% confidence interval 0.61, 0.84) was independently associated with improved overall survival. In this real-world population-based study of patients with uLAPC, FOLFIRINOX was associated with improved survival and higher resection rates. FOLFIRINOX was associated with improved survival in patients with uLAPC after accounting for the effect of post-chemotherapy surgical resection, suggesting the benefit of FOLFIRINOX was not solely due to improving resectability.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36863956
pii: S0936-6555(23)00055-9
doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2023.02.008
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Gemcitabine 0
Irinotecan 7673326042
130-nm albumin-bound paclitaxel 0
Oxaliplatin 04ZR38536J
Leucovorin Q573I9DVLP
Deoxycytidine 0W860991D6
Fluorouracil U3P01618RT
Paclitaxel P88XT4IS4D

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e303-e311

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

W F Dai (WF)

Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control, Toronto, Onatario, Canada.

S Habbous (S)

Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

R Saluja (R)

Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

J M Beca (JM)

Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control, Toronto, Onatario, Canada; Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

M Raphael (M)

Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

J Arias (J)

Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

S Gavura (S)

Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

C C Earle (CC)

Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

J J Biagi (JJ)

Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.

N Coburn (N)

Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

K K W Chan (KKW)

Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control, Toronto, Onatario, Canada; Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario), Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Electronic address: kelvin.chan@sunnybrook.ca.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH