Insertion sites of the muscles attached to the clavicle: a cadaveric study of the clavicle.
Anatomical structures
Anterior plate
Clavicle
Muscle attachments
Muscle insertion sites
Quantitative 3D analysis
Journal
BMC musculoskeletal disorders
ISSN: 1471-2474
Titre abrégé: BMC Musculoskelet Disord
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968565
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 Mar 2023
03 Mar 2023
Historique:
received:
27
09
2022
accepted:
23
02
2023
entrez:
2
3
2023
pubmed:
3
3
2023
medline:
7
3
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Clavicle fractures are common injuries, especially in young, active individuals. Operative treatment is recommended for completely displaced clavicle shaft fractures, and plate fixation is stronger than the use of intramedullary nails. Few studies have reported on iatrogenic injuries to the muscle attached to the clavicle during fracture surgery. The aim of this study was to clarify the area of the insertion sites of muscles attached to the clavicle in Japanese cadavers using gross anatomy and three-dimensional (3D) analysis. We also aimed to compare the effects of anterior plate templating and superior plate templating on clavicle shaft fractures using 3D images. Thirty-eight clavicles from Japanese cadavers were analyzed. We removed all clavicles to identify the insertion sites and measured the size of the insertion area of each muscle. Three-dimensional templating was performed on both the superior and anterior plates of the clavicle using data obtained from computed tomography. The areas covered by these plates on the muscles attached to the clavicle were compared. Histological examination was performed on four randomly selected specimens. The sternocleidomastoid muscle was attached proximally and superiorly; the trapezius muscle was attached posteriorly and partly superiorly; and the pectoralis major muscle and deltoid muscles were attached anteriorly and partially superiorly. The non-attachment area was located mainly in the posterosuperior part of the clavicle. It was difficult to distinguish the borders of the periosteum and pectoralis major muscles. The anterior plate covered a significantly broader area (mean 6.94 ± 1.36 cm Most of the pectoralis major and deltoid muscles were attached anteriorly. The non-attachment area was located mainly from the superior to posterior part of the clavicle midshaft. Both macroscopically and microscopically, the boundaries between the periosteum and these muscles were difficult to demarcate. The anterior plate covered a significantly broader area of the muscles attached to the clavicle than that by the superior plate.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Clavicle fractures are common injuries, especially in young, active individuals. Operative treatment is recommended for completely displaced clavicle shaft fractures, and plate fixation is stronger than the use of intramedullary nails. Few studies have reported on iatrogenic injuries to the muscle attached to the clavicle during fracture surgery. The aim of this study was to clarify the area of the insertion sites of muscles attached to the clavicle in Japanese cadavers using gross anatomy and three-dimensional (3D) analysis. We also aimed to compare the effects of anterior plate templating and superior plate templating on clavicle shaft fractures using 3D images.
METHODS
METHODS
Thirty-eight clavicles from Japanese cadavers were analyzed. We removed all clavicles to identify the insertion sites and measured the size of the insertion area of each muscle. Three-dimensional templating was performed on both the superior and anterior plates of the clavicle using data obtained from computed tomography. The areas covered by these plates on the muscles attached to the clavicle were compared. Histological examination was performed on four randomly selected specimens.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The sternocleidomastoid muscle was attached proximally and superiorly; the trapezius muscle was attached posteriorly and partly superiorly; and the pectoralis major muscle and deltoid muscles were attached anteriorly and partially superiorly. The non-attachment area was located mainly in the posterosuperior part of the clavicle. It was difficult to distinguish the borders of the periosteum and pectoralis major muscles. The anterior plate covered a significantly broader area (mean 6.94 ± 1.36 cm
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Most of the pectoralis major and deltoid muscles were attached anteriorly. The non-attachment area was located mainly from the superior to posterior part of the clavicle midshaft. Both macroscopically and microscopically, the boundaries between the periosteum and these muscles were difficult to demarcate. The anterior plate covered a significantly broader area of the muscles attached to the clavicle than that by the superior plate.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36864447
doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06266-4
pii: 10.1186/s12891-023-06266-4
pmc: PMC9983183
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
160Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Injury. 2018 Apr;49(4):753-765
pubmed: 29523350
Sci Rep. 2019 Nov 8;9(1):16293
pubmed: 31705003
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002 Nov;84(8):1093-110
pubmed: 12463652
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998 May;80(3):476-84
pubmed: 9619941
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 08;17(19):
pubmed: 33049982
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Sep 25;99(39):e22284
pubmed: 32991430
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Mar;90 Suppl 2 Pt 1:1-8
pubmed: 18310682
J Strength Cond Res. 2011 Oct;25(10):2891-4
pubmed: 21873902
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011 Sep;93(9):1247-52
pubmed: 21911537
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 Apr 3;101(7):628-634
pubmed: 30946197
Injury. 2021 Mar;52(3):501-505
pubmed: 33131791
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997 Jul;79(4):680-3
pubmed: 9250765
J Strength Cond Res. 2017 Jul;31(7):1879-1887
pubmed: 27669189
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021 Jan 1;479(1):129-138
pubmed: 32675585
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Apr 18;18(1):159
pubmed: 28420364
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Jun 21;99(12):1051-1057
pubmed: 28632595
Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2014 Nov 17;4(3):333-42
pubmed: 25489552
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012 Oct;21(10):1384-90
pubmed: 22265771
Orthop J Sports Med. 2019 Jul 26;7(7):2325967119861812
pubmed: 31384623
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 Dec;477(12):2761-2768
pubmed: 31764348
Br J Sports Med. 2017 Apr;51(7):600-606
pubmed: 26701931
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Jan;89(1):1-10
pubmed: 17200303