Serious Illness Communication Skills Training for Emergency Physicians and Advanced Practice Providers: A Multi-Method Assessment of the Reach and Effectiveness of the Intervention.

Communication Education and training Emergency medicine Palliative Care

Journal

Research square
Titre abrégé: Res Sq
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101768035

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
21 Feb 2023
Historique:
pubmed: 4 3 2023
medline: 4 3 2023
entrez: 3 3 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

EM Talk is a communication skills training program designed to improve emergency providers' serious illness conversational skills. Using the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework, this study aims to assess the reach of EM Talk and its effectiveness. EM Talk is one of the components of Primary Palliative Care for Emergency Medicine (EM) intervention. It consisted of one 4-hour training session during which professional actors used role-plays and active learning to train providers to deliver serious/bad news, express empathy, explore patients' goals, and formulate care plans. After the training, emergency providers filled out an optional post-intervention survey, which included course reflections. Using a multi-method analytical approach, we analyzed the reach of the intervention quantitatively and the effectiveness of the intervention qualitatively using conceptual content analysis of open-ended responses. A total of 879 out of 1,029 (85%) EM providers across 33 emergency departments completed the EM Talk training, with the training rate ranging from 63-100%. From the 326 reflections, we identified meaning units across the thematic domains of improved knowledge, attitude, and practice. The main subthemes across the three domains were the acquisition of discussion tips and tricks, improved attitude toward engaging qualifying patients in serious illness (SI) conversations, and commitment to using these learned skills in clinical practice. Effectively engaging qualifying patients in serious illness conversations requires appropriate communication skills. EM Talk has the potential to improve emergency providers' knowledge, attitude, and practice of SI communication skills. NCT03424109.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
EM Talk is a communication skills training program designed to improve emergency providers' serious illness conversational skills. Using the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework, this study aims to assess the reach of EM Talk and its effectiveness.
Methods UNASSIGNED
EM Talk is one of the components of Primary Palliative Care for Emergency Medicine (EM) intervention. It consisted of one 4-hour training session during which professional actors used role-plays and active learning to train providers to deliver serious/bad news, express empathy, explore patients' goals, and formulate care plans. After the training, emergency providers filled out an optional post-intervention survey, which included course reflections. Using a multi-method analytical approach, we analyzed the reach of the intervention quantitatively and the effectiveness of the intervention qualitatively using conceptual content analysis of open-ended responses.
Results UNASSIGNED
A total of 879 out of 1,029 (85%) EM providers across 33 emergency departments completed the EM Talk training, with the training rate ranging from 63-100%. From the 326 reflections, we identified meaning units across the thematic domains of improved knowledge, attitude, and practice. The main subthemes across the three domains were the acquisition of discussion tips and tricks, improved attitude toward engaging qualifying patients in serious illness (SI) conversations, and commitment to using these learned skills in clinical practice.
Conclusion UNASSIGNED
Effectively engaging qualifying patients in serious illness conversations requires appropriate communication skills. EM Talk has the potential to improve emergency providers' knowledge, attitude, and practice of SI communication skills.
Trial registration UNASSIGNED
NCT03424109.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36865121
doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2561749/v1
pmc: PMC9980220
pii:
doi:

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03424109']

Types de publication

Preprint

Langues

eng

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: The authors report no conflict of interest.

Auteurs

Oluwaseun Adeyemi (O)

NYU Grossman School of Medicine.

Regina Kaur (R)

CHI Saint Joseph Health.

Allison Cuthel (A)

NYU Grossman School of Medicine.

Nicole Zhao (N)

Stony Brook University.

Nina Siman (N)

NYU Grossman School of Medicine.

Keith Goldfeld (K)

NYU Grossman School of Medicine.

Lillian Liang Emlet (LL)

University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.

Charles DiMaggio (C)

NYU Grossman School of Medicine.

Rebecca Yamarik (R)

VA Long Beach Healthcare System.

Joshua Chodosh (J)

NYU Grossman School of Medicine.

Corita R Grudzen (CR)

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.

Classifications MeSH