Mechanical properties of extensive calcified costal cartilage: An experimental study.

Compressive test Elasticity Extensive calcified costal cartilage Mechanical properties Tensile test

Journal

Heliyon
ISSN: 2405-8440
Titre abrégé: Heliyon
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101672560

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Feb 2023
Historique:
received: 12 08 2022
revised: 03 02 2023
accepted: 07 02 2023
entrez: 3 3 2023
pubmed: 4 3 2023
medline: 4 3 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Autologous costal cartilage is widely used as nasal augmentation or nasal reconstruction material. However, no study has focused on the mechanical difference between no calcified costal cartilage and extensive calcified costal cartilage at present. Our study aims to study the loading behavior of calcified costal cartilage under tensile and compressive stress. Human costal cartilage specimen was obtained from five extensive calcified costal cartilage patients and classified into four groups (group A: no calcified costal cartilage; group B: calcified costal cartilage; group C: no calcified costal cartilage after transplantation in BALB/c nude mice for half a year; group D: calcified costal cartilage after transplantation in BALB/c nude mice for half a year). Young's modulus, stress relaxation slope, and relaxation amount were analyzed through tensile and compressive tests using a material testing machine. We included five female patients with extensive calcified costal cartilage. Group B exhibited significantly higher Young's modulus in both the tensile and compressive tests (p < 0.05 in tensile test, p < 0.01 in compressive test), higher relaxation slope (P < 0.01) and higher relaxation amount (p < 0.05 in compression test). After transplantation, the Young's modulus of calcified and non-calcified costal cartilage decreased, except that the calcified costal cartilage increased slightly in the tensile test. The final relaxation slope and relaxation amount had increased at different degrees, but the changes did not change significantly before and after transplantation (P > 0.05). Our results showed that the stiffness of calcified cartilage would increase 30.06% under tension and 126.31% under compression. This study may provide new insights to researchers focusing on extensive calcified costal cartilage can be used for autologous graft material.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Autologous costal cartilage is widely used as nasal augmentation or nasal reconstruction material. However, no study has focused on the mechanical difference between no calcified costal cartilage and extensive calcified costal cartilage at present. Our study aims to study the loading behavior of calcified costal cartilage under tensile and compressive stress.
Method UNASSIGNED
Human costal cartilage specimen was obtained from five extensive calcified costal cartilage patients and classified into four groups (group A: no calcified costal cartilage; group B: calcified costal cartilage; group C: no calcified costal cartilage after transplantation in BALB/c nude mice for half a year; group D: calcified costal cartilage after transplantation in BALB/c nude mice for half a year). Young's modulus, stress relaxation slope, and relaxation amount were analyzed through tensile and compressive tests using a material testing machine.
Results UNASSIGNED
We included five female patients with extensive calcified costal cartilage. Group B exhibited significantly higher Young's modulus in both the tensile and compressive tests (p < 0.05 in tensile test, p < 0.01 in compressive test), higher relaxation slope (P < 0.01) and higher relaxation amount (p < 0.05 in compression test). After transplantation, the Young's modulus of calcified and non-calcified costal cartilage decreased, except that the calcified costal cartilage increased slightly in the tensile test. The final relaxation slope and relaxation amount had increased at different degrees, but the changes did not change significantly before and after transplantation (P > 0.05).
Conclusion UNASSIGNED
Our results showed that the stiffness of calcified cartilage would increase 30.06% under tension and 126.31% under compression. This study may provide new insights to researchers focusing on extensive calcified costal cartilage can be used for autologous graft material.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36865463
doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13656
pii: S2405-8440(23)00863-0
pmc: PMC9970894
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e13656

Informations de copyright

© 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare no competing interests.

Références

Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008 Feb;40(2):193-9
pubmed: 18202585
Aesthet Surg J. 2015 Aug;35(6):644-52
pubmed: 26229125
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2020 Apr;44(2):549-557
pubmed: 31932888
J Orthop Res. 2003 Sep;21(5):872-80
pubmed: 12919876
Laryngoscope. 2015 Aug;125(8):E262-8
pubmed: 25891012
JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2015 Jan-Feb;17(1):49-55
pubmed: 25429595
J Craniofac Surg. 2017 Sep;28(6):1445-1450
pubmed: 28277476
Acta Biomater. 2015 May;18:226-35
pubmed: 25712387
Facial Plast Surg. 2020 Oct;36(5):528-538
pubmed: 33368077
Lasers Surg Med. 2015 Mar;47(3):243-51
pubmed: 25689939
J Craniofac Surg. 2018 Nov;29(8):2032-2037
pubmed: 29927821
JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2014 Mar-Apr;16(2):102-6
pubmed: 24287925
Lasers Surg Med. 2011 Aug;43(6):511-5
pubmed: 21761421
J Craniofac Surg. 2019 Jan;30(1):e28-e32
pubmed: 30444766
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2014;17(2):94-107
pubmed: 22515744
Acta Biomater. 2011 Mar;7(3):1202-9
pubmed: 20974298
J Biomech. 2021 Sep 20;126:110638
pubmed: 34314997
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2011 Jun;64(6):742-6
pubmed: 21130718
Lasers Surg Med. 2008 Oct;40(8):550-61
pubmed: 18798288
J Biomech. 2020 Apr 16;103:109688
pubmed: 32145904
J Cosmet Dermatol. 2022 Sep;21(9):3954-3961
pubmed: 35005832

Auteurs

Xin Wang (X)

Department of Rhinoplasty, Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No 33, Badachu Road, Shijingshan, Beijing, 100730, PR China.

Wenfang Dong (W)

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Huayuan Road, Beijing, 100191, PR China.

Huan Wang (H)

Department of Rhinoplasty, Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No 33, Badachu Road, Shijingshan, Beijing, 100730, PR China.

Jianjun You (J)

Department of Rhinoplasty, Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No 33, Badachu Road, Shijingshan, Beijing, 100730, PR China.

Ruobing Zheng (R)

Department of Rhinoplasty, Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No 33, Badachu Road, Shijingshan, Beijing, 100730, PR China.

Yihao Xu (Y)

Department of Rhinoplasty, Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No 33, Badachu Road, Shijingshan, Beijing, 100730, PR China.

Fei Fan (F)

Department of Rhinoplasty, Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No 33, Badachu Road, Shijingshan, Beijing, 100730, PR China.

Classifications MeSH