Case report: Experience with the Cube Navigation System in complex access routes during CT-guided lumbosacral infiltration therapy.

computer tomography infiltration navigation pain therapy

Journal

Frontiers in surgery
ISSN: 2296-875X
Titre abrégé: Front Surg
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101645127

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2023
Historique:
received: 09 11 2022
accepted: 23 01 2023
entrez: 3 3 2023
pubmed: 4 3 2023
medline: 4 3 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Computed tomography (CT)-guided infiltrations are a mainstay in the treatment of lower back pain. Needle placement is usually performed using the free-hand method, where the translation from the planned needle angle to the actual needle insertion angle is estimated. However, the free-hand method is especially challenging in cases where a double-oblique access route (out-of-plane) rather than an in-plane route is necessary. In this case series, we report our experience with the patient-mounted Cube Navigation System to guide needle placement for complex access routes in lumbar pain therapy. We retrospectively analyzed the cases of five patients in whom a double-oblique access route was necessary for CT-guided lumbar infiltration pain treatment. Each of those procedures was done using the Cube Navigation System to provide navigational guidance. The mean patient age was 69 ± 13 years (range 58-82 years; all females). Technical success, procedure time, and number of control scans were determined retrospectively. Technical success (i.e., positioning and accuracy) was obtained in all cases. Mean procedure time was 15 ± 7 min (10-22 min); on average, 2 ± 1 CT control scans were performed. There were no complications or material failures reported in the present study. Double-oblique punctures with the Cube Navigation System in this initial case series of complex access routes at the lumbar spine were accurate and the procedure was time efficient. In the authors' view, the Cube Navigation System has the potential to improve needle guidance for complex access routes, especially considering the ease of use of the device.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36865624
doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1093964
pmc: PMC9971217
doi:

Types de publication

Case Reports

Langues

eng

Pagination

1093964

Informations de copyright

© 2023 Diepers, Gruber, Remonda and Berberat.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2013 Aug;36(4):1055-62
pubmed: 23232857
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2015 Feb;24(1):45-53
pubmed: 25421786
Eur J Radiol. 2015 Oct;84(10):1976-80
pubmed: 26210096
Pain Physician. 2021 Jan;24(S1):S27-S208
pubmed: 33492918
Neuroradiology. 2019 Jan;61(1):55-61
pubmed: 30506482
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 15;12(3):e0173751
pubmed: 28296957
Br J Radiol. 2016;89(1057):20150357
pubmed: 26463233
Rofo. 2016 May;188(5):470-8
pubmed: 27074422
Semin Intervent Radiol. 2015 Dec;32(4):416-27
pubmed: 26622105
Lancet. 2016 Oct 8;388(10053):1603-1658
pubmed: 27733283
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Sep 28;58(10):
pubmed: 36295520

Auteurs

Michael Diepers (M)

Department of Neuroradiology, Kantonsspital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland.

Philipp Gruber (P)

Department of Neuroradiology, Kantonsspital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland.

Luca Remonda (L)

Department of Neuroradiology, Kantonsspital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland.

Jatta Berberat (J)

Department of Neuroradiology, Kantonsspital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland.

Classifications MeSH