Virtual Reality for Emergency Medicine Training in Medical School: Prospective, Large-Cohort Implementation Study.
Germany
digital learning
emergency medicine
medical education
medical student
resuscitation
simulation
undergraduate medical education
virtual reality
virtual training
Journal
Journal of medical Internet research
ISSN: 1438-8871
Titre abrégé: J Med Internet Res
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 100959882
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 03 2023
03 03 2023
Historique:
received:
28
10
2022
accepted:
13
01
2023
revised:
30
11
2022
entrez:
3
3
2023
pubmed:
4
3
2023
medline:
8
3
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Virtual reality (VR)-based simulation is being increasingly used to train medical students in emergency medicine. However, because the usefulness of VR may depend on various factors, the best practices for implementing this technology in the medical school curriculum are yet to be determined. The overall objective of our study was to assess the perceptions of a large cohort of students toward VR-based training and to identify the associations between these attitudes and individual factors, such as gender and age. The authors implemented a voluntary, VR-based teaching session in the emergency medicine course at the Medical Faculty in Tübingen, Germany. Fourth-year medical students were invited to participate on a voluntary basis. Afterward, we asked the students about their perceptions, collected data on individual factors, and assessed the test scores achieved by them in the VR-based assessment scenarios. We used ordinal regression analysis and linear mixed-effects analysis to detect the impact of individual factors on the questionnaire answers. A total of 129 students participated in our study (mean age 24.7, SD 2.9 years; n=51, 39.8% male; n=77, 60.2% female). No student had previously used VR for learning, and only 4.7% (n=6) of the students had prior experience with VR. Most of the students agreed that VR can convey complex issues quickly (n=117, 91%), that VR is a useful addition to mannequin-based courses (n=114, 88%) or could even replace them (n=93, 72%), and that VR simulations should also be used for examinations (n=103, 80%). However, female students showed significantly less agreement with these statements. Most students perceived the VR scenario as realistic (n=69, 53%) and intuitive (n=62, 48%), with a relatively lower agreement for the latter among female respondents. We found high agreement among all participants (n=88, 69%) for immersion but strong disagreement (n=69, 54%) for empathy with the virtual patient. Only 3% (n=4) of the students felt confident regarding the medical content. Responses for the linguistic aspects of the scenario were largely mixed; however, most of the students were confident with the English language (not native) scenarios and disagreed that the scenario should be offered in their native language (female students agreed more strongly than male students). Most of the students would not have felt confident with the scenarios in a real-world context (n=69, 53%). Although physical symptoms during VR sessions were reported by 16% (n=21) of the respondents, this did not lead to the termination of the simulation. The regression analysis revealed that the final test scores were not influenced by gender, age, or prior experience in emergency medicine or with virtual reality. In this study, we observed a strong positive attitude in medical students toward VR-based teaching and assessment. However, this positivity was comparatively lower among female students, potentially indicating that gender differences need to be addressed when VR is implemented in the curriculum. Interestingly, gender, age, or prior experience did not influence the final test scores. Furthermore, confidence regarding the medical content was low, which suggests that the students may need further training in emergency medicine.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Virtual reality (VR)-based simulation is being increasingly used to train medical students in emergency medicine. However, because the usefulness of VR may depend on various factors, the best practices for implementing this technology in the medical school curriculum are yet to be determined.
OBJECTIVE
The overall objective of our study was to assess the perceptions of a large cohort of students toward VR-based training and to identify the associations between these attitudes and individual factors, such as gender and age.
METHODS
The authors implemented a voluntary, VR-based teaching session in the emergency medicine course at the Medical Faculty in Tübingen, Germany. Fourth-year medical students were invited to participate on a voluntary basis. Afterward, we asked the students about their perceptions, collected data on individual factors, and assessed the test scores achieved by them in the VR-based assessment scenarios. We used ordinal regression analysis and linear mixed-effects analysis to detect the impact of individual factors on the questionnaire answers.
RESULTS
A total of 129 students participated in our study (mean age 24.7, SD 2.9 years; n=51, 39.8% male; n=77, 60.2% female). No student had previously used VR for learning, and only 4.7% (n=6) of the students had prior experience with VR. Most of the students agreed that VR can convey complex issues quickly (n=117, 91%), that VR is a useful addition to mannequin-based courses (n=114, 88%) or could even replace them (n=93, 72%), and that VR simulations should also be used for examinations (n=103, 80%). However, female students showed significantly less agreement with these statements. Most students perceived the VR scenario as realistic (n=69, 53%) and intuitive (n=62, 48%), with a relatively lower agreement for the latter among female respondents. We found high agreement among all participants (n=88, 69%) for immersion but strong disagreement (n=69, 54%) for empathy with the virtual patient. Only 3% (n=4) of the students felt confident regarding the medical content. Responses for the linguistic aspects of the scenario were largely mixed; however, most of the students were confident with the English language (not native) scenarios and disagreed that the scenario should be offered in their native language (female students agreed more strongly than male students). Most of the students would not have felt confident with the scenarios in a real-world context (n=69, 53%). Although physical symptoms during VR sessions were reported by 16% (n=21) of the respondents, this did not lead to the termination of the simulation. The regression analysis revealed that the final test scores were not influenced by gender, age, or prior experience in emergency medicine or with virtual reality.
CONCLUSIONS
In this study, we observed a strong positive attitude in medical students toward VR-based teaching and assessment. However, this positivity was comparatively lower among female students, potentially indicating that gender differences need to be addressed when VR is implemented in the curriculum. Interestingly, gender, age, or prior experience did not influence the final test scores. Furthermore, confidence regarding the medical content was low, which suggests that the students may need further training in emergency medicine.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36867440
pii: v25i1e43649
doi: 10.2196/43649
pmc: PMC10024212
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e43649Informations de copyright
©Moritz Mahling, Robert Wunderlich, Daniel Steiner, Eleonora Gorgati, Teresa Festl-Wietek, Anne Herrmann-Werner. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 03.03.2023.
Références
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2011 May;21(4):329-33
pubmed: 21563940
Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Oct;48:370-371
pubmed: 33581938
Front Robot AI. 2020 Jan 31;7:4
pubmed: 33501173
Acad Emerg Med. 2018 Feb;25(2):186-195
pubmed: 28888070
Int J Emerg Med. 2020 Apr 16;13(1):17
pubmed: 32299358
Front Psychol. 2020 Aug 07;11:1604
pubmed: 32903791
JAMA. 2008 Mar 12;299(10):1158-65
pubmed: 18334691
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2021 Feb 1;29(1):27
pubmed: 33526042
Postgrad Med J. 2016 Nov;92(1093):653-658
pubmed: 27129912
SAGE Open Med. 2018 Sep 17;6:2050312118799602
pubmed: 30245815
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1991 Sep;61(3):413-26
pubmed: 1941512
Resuscitation. 2021 Apr;161:388-407
pubmed: 33773831
Exp Brain Res. 2017 Mar;235(3):889-901
pubmed: 27915367
Acad Emerg Med. 2002 Jan;9(1):78-87
pubmed: 11772675
J Med Libr Assoc. 2018 Oct;106(4):498-500
pubmed: 30271295
Australas Emerg Care. 2023 Mar;26(1):75-83
pubmed: 35953392