Sustained Remission and Outcomes with Abatacept plus Methotrexate Following Stepwise Dose De-escalation in Patients with Early Rheumatoid Arthritis.
Abatacept
Anti-citrullinated protein autoantibodies (ACPAs)
Clinical trial
Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs)
Rheumatoid arthritis
Journal
Rheumatology and therapy
ISSN: 2198-6576
Titre abrégé: Rheumatol Ther
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101674543
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2023
Jun 2023
Historique:
received:
08
03
2022
accepted:
02
12
2022
medline:
4
3
2023
pubmed:
4
3
2023
entrez:
3
3
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
One target of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment is to achieve early sustained remission; over the long term, patients in sustained remission have less structural joint damage and physical disability. We evaluated Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) remission with abatacept + methotrexate versus abatacept placebo + methotrexate and impact of de-escalation (DE) in anti-citrullinated protein antibody (ACPA)-positive patients with early RA. The phase IIIb, randomized, AVERT-2 two-stage study (NCT02504268) evaluated weekly abatacept + methotrexate versus abatacept placebo + methotrexate. SDAI remission (≤ 3.3) at week 24. Pre-planned exploratory endpoint: maintenance of remission in patients with sustained remission (weeks 40 and 52) who, from week 56 for 48 weeks (DE period), (1) continued combination abatacept + methotrexate, (2) tapered abatacept to every other week (EOW) + methotrexate for 24 weeks with subsequent abatacept withdrawal (abatacept placebo + methotrexate), or (3) withdrew methotrexate (abatacept monotherapy). Primary study endpoint was not met: 21.3% (48/225) of patients in the combination and 16.0% (24/150) in the abatacept placebo + methotrexate arm achieved SDAI remission at week 24 (p = 0.2359). There were numerical differences favoring combination therapy in clinical assessments, patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and week 52 radiographic non-progression. After week 56, 147 patients in sustained remission with abatacept + methotrexate were randomized (combination, n = 50; DE/withdrawal, n = 50; abatacept monotherapy, n = 47) and entered DE. At DE week 48, SDAI remission (74%) and PRO improvements were mostly maintained with continued combination therapy; lower remission rates were observed with abatacept placebo + methotrexate (48.0%) and with abatacept monotherapy (57.4%). Before withdrawal, de-escalating to abatacept EOW + methotrexate preserved remission. The stringent primary endpoint was not met. However, in patients achieving sustained SDAI remission, numerically more maintained remission with continued abatacept + methotrexate versus abatacept monotherapy or withdrawal. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT02504268. Video abstract (MP4 62241 KB). Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) experience inflamed and damaged joints. RA is an autoimmune disease in which proteins called autoantibodies, particularly anti-citrullinated protein autoantibodies, target the patient’s own joint tissue and organs by mistake, leading to symptomatic inflammation. Successful treatment can decrease the disease’s activity to a state known as remission. Patients in remission may experience little or no symptoms and it may be possible for some to then be able to decrease their treatment. Here, we report the results of a large, international study that looked at two treatments, abatacept and methotrexate, in patients with RA and anti-citrullinated protein autoantibodies. The study had two parts. Firstly, to see how many patients had success (remission) with weekly abatacept and/or methotrexate treatment, and secondly, to see if remission was maintained when treatment was either continued or decreased and stopped. The study showed that the number of patients in remission 6 months after treatment started was not greatly different between patients treated with both abatacept and methotrexate and those treated with just methotrexate. Those taking abatacept and methotrexate together had better remission rates 1 year later. More patients also stayed in remission when they continued to receive both abatacept and methotrexate compared with those who were just treated with abatacept or when their abatacept treatment was decreased and stopped. More patients stayed in remission when abatacept was decreased than when it was stopped. The results from this study may help determine possible future treatment reduction and/or withdrawal plans for some patients with RA.
Autres résumés
Type: plain-language-summary
(eng)
Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) experience inflamed and damaged joints. RA is an autoimmune disease in which proteins called autoantibodies, particularly anti-citrullinated protein autoantibodies, target the patient’s own joint tissue and organs by mistake, leading to symptomatic inflammation. Successful treatment can decrease the disease’s activity to a state known as remission. Patients in remission may experience little or no symptoms and it may be possible for some to then be able to decrease their treatment. Here, we report the results of a large, international study that looked at two treatments, abatacept and methotrexate, in patients with RA and anti-citrullinated protein autoantibodies. The study had two parts. Firstly, to see how many patients had success (remission) with weekly abatacept and/or methotrexate treatment, and secondly, to see if remission was maintained when treatment was either continued or decreased and stopped. The study showed that the number of patients in remission 6 months after treatment started was not greatly different between patients treated with both abatacept and methotrexate and those treated with just methotrexate. Those taking abatacept and methotrexate together had better remission rates 1 year later. More patients also stayed in remission when they continued to receive both abatacept and methotrexate compared with those who were just treated with abatacept or when their abatacept treatment was decreased and stopped. More patients stayed in remission when abatacept was decreased than when it was stopped. The results from this study may help determine possible future treatment reduction and/or withdrawal plans for some patients with RA.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36869251
doi: 10.1007/s40744-022-00519-9
pii: 10.1007/s40744-022-00519-9
pmc: PMC10140217
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02504268']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
707-727Subventions
Organisme : NIAMS NIH HHS
ID : UH2 AR067691
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Ann Rheum Dis. 2016 Apr;75(4):709-14
pubmed: 26359449
J Rheumatol. 1993 Mar;20(3):557-60
pubmed: 8478873
Am J Transl Res. 2017 Aug 15;9(8):3758-3775
pubmed: 28861167
Nat Rev Immunol. 2017 Jan;17(1):60-75
pubmed: 27916980
Ann Rheum Dis. 2009 Dec;68(12):1870-7
pubmed: 19124524
RMD Open. 2019 Feb 8;5(1):e000840
pubmed: 30997151
Ann Rheum Dis. 2016 Aug;75(8):1428-37
pubmed: 27261493
Clin Rheumatol. 2014 Feb;33(2):269-72
pubmed: 24384827
N Engl J Med. 2005 Sep 15;353(11):1114-23
pubmed: 16162882
RMD Open. 2016 Jul 07;2(2):e000222
pubmed: 27486524
Ann Rheum Dis. 2015 May;74(5):843-50
pubmed: 24431394
Arthritis Res Ther. 2019 Jul 5;21(1):164
pubmed: 31277720
Ann Rheum Dis. 2011 Mar;70(3):404-13
pubmed: 21292833
Arthritis Rheum. 2011 Mar;63(3):609-21
pubmed: 21360490
Arthritis Rheum. 2010 Sep;62(9):2569-81
pubmed: 20872595
Rheumatol Int. 2016 Aug;36(8):1043-63
pubmed: 27271502
Ann Rheum Dis. 2015 May;74(5):793-4
pubmed: 25757869
Ann Rheum Dis. 2001 Apr;60(4):344-8
pubmed: 11247863
Arthritis Rheum. 2011 Oct;63(10):2854-64
pubmed: 21618201
Ann Rheum Dis. 2013 Apr;72 Suppl 2:ii124-7
pubmed: 23253919
N Engl J Med. 2014 Nov 6;371(19):1781-92
pubmed: 25372086
Ann Rheum Dis. 2019 Feb;78(2):171-178
pubmed: 30194275
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021 Jul;73(7):1108-1123
pubmed: 34101376
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 24;10(8):e0135327
pubmed: 26301589
Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2017 Oct;9(10):249-262
pubmed: 28974987
Clin Rheumatol. 2017 Jun;36(6):1215-1220
pubmed: 28251392
Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Jan;73(1):86-94
pubmed: 23962455
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2016 Dec;55(suppl 2):ii15-ii22
pubmed: 27856656
Ann Rheum Dis. 2020 Jun;79(6):685-699
pubmed: 31969328
Ann Rheum Dis. 2015 Jan;74(1):19-26
pubmed: 25367713
Arthritis Res Ther. 2016 Jan 21;18:23
pubmed: 26794605
Arthritis Res Ther. 2018 Jan 16;20(1):8
pubmed: 29338762
JAMA. 2019 Jul 23;322(4):315-325
pubmed: 31334793
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020 Oct;72(10):1607-1620
pubmed: 32638504