What makes for effectiveness when starting early - Learning from an integrated school-based violence and abuse prevention programme for children under 12.


Journal

Child abuse & neglect
ISSN: 1873-7757
Titre abrégé: Child Abuse Negl
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7801702

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 2023
Historique:
received: 30 08 2022
revised: 19 12 2022
accepted: 12 02 2023
medline: 4 4 2023
pubmed: 5 3 2023
entrez: 4 3 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Integrated programmes addressing varying forms of violence and abuse are increasingly delivered to children under 12 but uncertainty remains about what should be delivered to whom, when and in what dose. To examine the impact of Speak Out Stay Safe (SOSS) - an integrated prevention programme for children under 12 - and whether impact varied by age, gender and context. A representative UK sample of primary schools in receipt of SOSS was matched with comparison schools not receiving SOSS. At 6 months follow-up, 1553 children from 36 schools completed the survey. The matched control study incorporated economic and process evaluations. Survey measures included: children's knowledge and understanding of different forms of violence and abuse, readiness to seek help, knowledge of sexual abuse, perceptions of school culture and health and wellbeing. Perceptions of children, teachers, and facilitators were captured. At 6 months, children aged 9-10 who received SOSS retained their improved knowledge of neglect and their ability to identify a trusted adult who they would tell about violence or abuse. Children aged 6-7 receiving a shorter version of the programme were less likely to benefit and boys made fewer gains than girls. SOSS improved the knowledge of children with low knowledge of abuse. School culture was closely associated with programme impact. School-based prevention programmes deliver benefits at low cost but should acknowledge and engage with the specific school context to achieve school readiness and embed programme messages.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Integrated programmes addressing varying forms of violence and abuse are increasingly delivered to children under 12 but uncertainty remains about what should be delivered to whom, when and in what dose.
OBJECTIVE
To examine the impact of Speak Out Stay Safe (SOSS) - an integrated prevention programme for children under 12 - and whether impact varied by age, gender and context.
PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING
A representative UK sample of primary schools in receipt of SOSS was matched with comparison schools not receiving SOSS. At 6 months follow-up, 1553 children from 36 schools completed the survey.
METHODS
The matched control study incorporated economic and process evaluations. Survey measures included: children's knowledge and understanding of different forms of violence and abuse, readiness to seek help, knowledge of sexual abuse, perceptions of school culture and health and wellbeing. Perceptions of children, teachers, and facilitators were captured.
RESULTS
At 6 months, children aged 9-10 who received SOSS retained their improved knowledge of neglect and their ability to identify a trusted adult who they would tell about violence or abuse. Children aged 6-7 receiving a shorter version of the programme were less likely to benefit and boys made fewer gains than girls. SOSS improved the knowledge of children with low knowledge of abuse. School culture was closely associated with programme impact.
CONCLUSION
School-based prevention programmes deliver benefits at low cost but should acknowledge and engage with the specific school context to achieve school readiness and embed programme messages.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36870266
pii: S0145-2134(23)00090-X
doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2023.106109
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

106109

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Nicky Stanley (N)

University of Central Lancashire, Preston PR1 2HE, UK. Electronic address: NStanley@uclan.ac.uk.

John Devaney (J)

University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9YL, UK.

Zain Kurdi (Z)

University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9YL, UK.

Ugur Ozdemir (U)

University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9YL, UK.

Christine Barter (C)

University of Central Lancashire, Preston PR1 2HE, UK.

Claire Monks (C)

University of Greenwich, London SE10 9LS, UK.

Rhiannon Tudor Edwards (RT)

Bangor University, Bangor LL57 2DG, UK.

Farwa Batool (F)

University of Central Lancashire, Preston PR1 2HE, UK.

Joanna Charles (J)

Bangor University, Bangor LL57 2DG, UK.

Nicola Farrelly (N)

University of Central Lancashire, Preston PR1 2HE, UK.

David Hayes (D)

Queen's University Belfast, Belfast BT7 1NN, UK.

Annemarie Millar (A)

Queen's University Belfast, Belfast BT7 1NN, UK.

Trevor Thompson (T)

University of Greenwich, London SE10 9LS, UK.

Eira Winrow (E)

Bangor University, Bangor LL57 2DG, UK.

Lorraine Radford (L)

University of Central Lancashire, Preston PR1 2HE, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH