A prospective, randomized, comparative clinical study to compare the safety and efficacy of different hydrophobic aspheric monofocal intraocular lenses.
Aspheric
intraocular lens
monofocal
Journal
Indian journal of ophthalmology
ISSN: 1998-3689
Titre abrégé: Indian J Ophthalmol
Pays: India
ID NLM: 0405376
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 2023
03 2023
Historique:
entrez:
6
3
2023
pubmed:
7
3
2023
medline:
8
3
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To report the 1-year clinical outcomes related to safety, efficacy, predictability, contrast sensitivity, patient satisfaction, complications, and overall results with Optiflex Genesis and Eyecryl Plus (ASHFY 600) monofocal aspheric intraocular lenses (IOLs) and compare the same with Tecnis-1 monofocal IOL. This prospective, single-center, single-surgeon, randomized, three-arm study included 159 eyes of 140 eligible patients who underwent cataract extraction with IOL implantation with any of the three study lenses. Clinical outcomes related to safety, efficacy, predictability, contrast sensitivity, patient satisfaction, complications, and overall results were compared at a mean follow-up of 1 year (12 ± 1.20 months). Preoperatively, age and baseline ocular parameters of all the three groups were matched. At 12 months post-op, no significant differences were noted among the groups in terms of mean postoperative uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity (UDVA and CDVA, respectively) sphere, cylinder, and spherical equivalent (SE; P > 0.05 for all parameters). Eighty-nine percent eyes in the Optiflex Genesis group as against 96% eyes in the Tecnis-1 and Eyecryl Plus (ASHFY 600) groups were within ± 0.5 D, and 100% of eyes in all the three groups were within ± 1.00 D of SE accuracy. Postoperative internal higher-order aberrations (HOAs) and coma, and mesopic contrast sensitivity at all spatial frequencies were comparable across all the three groups. Two eyes in the Tecnis-1 group, two eyes in the Optiflex group, and one eye in the Eyecryl Plus (ASHFY 600) group underwent YAG capsulotomy at the last follow-up. No eye in any of the groups showed glistenings or required IOL exchange due to any reason. At 1-year post-op, all the three aspheric lenses showed comparable results in visual and refractive parameters, post-op aberrations, contrast sensitivity, and posterior capsule opacification (PCO) behavior. Further follow-up is needed to evaluate the long-term behavior for refractive stability and PCO rates of these lenses. CTRI/2019/08/020754 (www.ctri.nic.in).
Identifiants
pubmed: 36872676
pii: IndianJOphthalmol_2023_71_3_771_371040
doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1073_22
pmc: PMC10229952
doi:
Types de publication
Randomized Controlled Trial
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
771-778Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
None
Références
J Cataract Refract Surg. 1997 Jul-Aug;23(6):866-72
pubmed: 9292670
J Refract Surg. 2004 Jul-Aug;20(4):297-306
pubmed: 15307390
Clin Ophthalmol. 2014 Feb 21;8:421-7
pubmed: 24591811
J Refract Surg. 2002 Nov-Dec;18(6):683-91
pubmed: 12458861
J Refract Surg. 2006 Feb;22(2):172-7
pubmed: 16523837
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015 May;41(5):1111-3
pubmed: 26049840
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006 Jan;32(1):78-84
pubmed: 16516783
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009 Jan;35(1):172-81
pubmed: 19101441
Rom J Ophthalmol. 2018 Jul-Sep;62(3):188-193
pubmed: 30505987
Int J Ophthalmol. 2018 Jan 18;11(1):6-11
pubmed: 29375983
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010 Aug;36(8):1398-420
pubmed: 20656166
Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2006 Feb;17(1):45-53
pubmed: 16436924
J Pharm Investig. 2017;47(5):453-460
pubmed: 29046825
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004 Apr;30(4):892-900
pubmed: 15093657
Am J Ophthalmol. 2013 Jul;156(1):77-81.e2
pubmed: 23541394
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005 Mar;31(3):574-85
pubmed: 15811748
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2019 Jun;45(6):847-853
pubmed: 30929976
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006 Aug;32(8):1320-7
pubmed: 16863968
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008 Sep;34(9):1611
pubmed: 18721731
Ophthalmology. 2005 Sep;112(9):1550-6
pubmed: 16005976
Eye (Lond). 2020 May;34(5):960-968
pubmed: 31616057
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005 Nov;31(11):2172-9
pubmed: 16412935
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1991 Apr;11(2):137-46
pubmed: 2062538