Study on Screening and Evaluation of Foam Drainage Agents for Gas Wells with High Temperature and High Pressure.


Journal

ACS omega
ISSN: 2470-1343
Titre abrégé: ACS Omega
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101691658

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
28 Feb 2023
Historique:
received: 03 12 2022
accepted: 06 02 2023
entrez: 6 3 2023
pubmed: 7 3 2023
medline: 7 3 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Foam drainage gas recovery technology is a chemical method to solve the serious bottom-hole liquid loading in the middle and late stages of gas well production, and the optimization of foam drainage agents (referred to as FDAs) is the key to the technology. According to the actual reservoir conditions, a high-temperature and high-pressure (HTHP) evaluation device for FDAs was set up in this study. The six key properties of FDAs, such as HTHP resistance, dynamic liquid carrying capacity, oil resistance, and salinity resistance, were evaluated systematically. Taking initial foaming volume, half-life, comprehensive index, and liquid carrying rate as evaluation indexes, the FDA with the best performance was selected and the concentration was optimized. In addition, the experimental results were verified by surface tension measurement and electron microscopy observation. The results showed that the sulfonate compound surfactant (UT-6) had good foamability, excellent foam stability, and better oil resistance at high temperature and high pressure. In addition, UT-6 had stronger liquid carrying capacity at a lower concentration, which could meet the production requirement when the salinity was 80 000 mg/L. Therefore, compared with the other five FDAs, UT-6 was more suitable for HTHP gas wells in block X of the Bohai Bay Basin, whose optimal concentration was 0.25 wt %. Interestingly, the UT-6 solution had the lowest surface tension at the same concentration, with the generated bubbles being closely arranged and uniform in size. Moreover, in the UT-6 foam system, the drainage speed at the plateau boundary was relatively slower with the smallest bubble. It is expected that UT-6 will become a promising candidate for foam drainage gas recovery technology in HTHP gas wells.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36873001
doi: 10.1021/acsomega.2c07715
pmc: PMC9979355
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

7940-7949

Informations de copyright

© 2023 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Références

J Colloid Interface Sci. 2018 Feb 1;511:365-373
pubmed: 29031155
Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2014 Mar;205:74-86
pubmed: 24342735
J Colloid Interface Sci. 2003 Nov 1;267(1):160-6
pubmed: 14554181
Langmuir. 2008 Oct 21;24(20):11587-91
pubmed: 18783259
Soft Matter. 2020 Apr 29;16(16):3981-3990
pubmed: 32250379
RSC Adv. 2021 Sep 6;11(47):29711-29727
pubmed: 35479573
Soft Matter. 2014 Sep 28;10(36):6975-83
pubmed: 24832218

Auteurs

Jian Guan (J)

School of Petroleum Engineering, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao 266580, Shandong, People's Republic of China.

Lihao Liang (L)

Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development, Beijing 100083, People's Republic of China.

Yulong Zhao (Y)

School of Petroleum Engineering, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, People's Republic of China.

Ning Sun (N)

School of Petroleum Engineering, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao 266580, Shandong, People's Republic of China.

Wei Lu (W)

PetroChina Company Limited, Huanqing Oil Production Factory of Yumen Oilfield Co., Ltd., Qingyang 745700, People's Republic of China.

Yuanshui Zhen (Y)

PetroChina Company Limited, Research Institute of Exploration and Development of Yumen Oilfield Co., Ltd., Jiuquan 735019, People's Republic of China.

Classifications MeSH