Clopidogrel Monotherapy After 1-Month DAPT in Patients With High Bleeding Risk or Complex PCI.
ARC, Academic Research Consortium
DAPT, dual antiplatelet therapy
HBR, high bleeding risk
PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention
antiplatelet therapy
complexity
coronary stent
high bleeding risk
percutaneous coronary intervention
Journal
JACC. Asia
ISSN: 2772-3747
Titre abrégé: JACC Asia
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9918452380106676
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2023
Feb 2023
Historique:
received:
24
06
2022
revised:
29
08
2022
accepted:
15
09
2022
entrez:
6
3
2023
pubmed:
7
3
2023
medline:
7
3
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
High bleeding risk (HBR) and complex percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are major determinants for dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) duration. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of HBR and complex PCI on short vs standard DAPT. Subgroup analyses were conducted on the basis of Academic Research Consortium-defined HBR and complex PCI in the STOPDAPT-2 (Short and Optimal Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Verulam's-Eluting Cobalt-Chromium Stent-2) Total Cohort, which randomly compared clopidogrel monotherapy after 1-month DAPT with 12-month DAPT with aspirin and clopidogrel after PCI. The primary endpoint was the composite of cardiovascular (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, definite stent thrombosis, or stroke) or bleeding (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction [TIMI] major or minor) endpoints at 1 year. Regardless of HBR (n = 1,893 [31.6%]) and complex PCI (n = 999 [16.7%]), the risk of 1-month DAPT relative to 12-month DAPT was not significant for the primary endpoint (HBR, 5.01% vs 5.14%; non-HBR, 1.90% vs 2.02%; The effects of 1-month DAPT relative to 12-month DAPT were consistent regardless of HBR and complex PCI. The absolute benefit of 1-month DAPT over 12-month DAPT in reducing major bleeding was numerically greater in patients with HBR than in those without HBR. Complex PCI might not be an appropriate determinant for DAPT durations after PCI. (Short and Optimal Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Everolimus-Eluting Cobalt-Chromium Stent-2 [STOPDAPT-2], NCT02619760; Short and Optimal Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Everolimus-Eluting Cobalt-Chromium Stent-2 for the Patients With ACS [STOPDAPT-2 ACS], NCT03462498).
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
High bleeding risk (HBR) and complex percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are major determinants for dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) duration.
Objectives
UNASSIGNED
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of HBR and complex PCI on short vs standard DAPT.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
Subgroup analyses were conducted on the basis of Academic Research Consortium-defined HBR and complex PCI in the STOPDAPT-2 (Short and Optimal Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Verulam's-Eluting Cobalt-Chromium Stent-2) Total Cohort, which randomly compared clopidogrel monotherapy after 1-month DAPT with 12-month DAPT with aspirin and clopidogrel after PCI. The primary endpoint was the composite of cardiovascular (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, definite stent thrombosis, or stroke) or bleeding (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction [TIMI] major or minor) endpoints at 1 year.
Results
UNASSIGNED
Regardless of HBR (n = 1,893 [31.6%]) and complex PCI (n = 999 [16.7%]), the risk of 1-month DAPT relative to 12-month DAPT was not significant for the primary endpoint (HBR, 5.01% vs 5.14%; non-HBR, 1.90% vs 2.02%;
Conclusions
UNASSIGNED
The effects of 1-month DAPT relative to 12-month DAPT were consistent regardless of HBR and complex PCI. The absolute benefit of 1-month DAPT over 12-month DAPT in reducing major bleeding was numerically greater in patients with HBR than in those without HBR. Complex PCI might not be an appropriate determinant for DAPT durations after PCI. (Short and Optimal Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Everolimus-Eluting Cobalt-Chromium Stent-2 [STOPDAPT-2], NCT02619760; Short and Optimal Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Everolimus-Eluting Cobalt-Chromium Stent-2 for the Patients With ACS [STOPDAPT-2 ACS], NCT03462498).
Identifiants
pubmed: 36873770
doi: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2022.09.011
pii: S2772-3747(22)00278-2
pmc: PMC9982293
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03462498']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
31-46Informations de copyright
© 2023 The Authors.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
This work (STOPDAPT-2 and STOPDAPT-2 ACS) was supported by Abbott Vascular Japan. The study sponsor is not involved in the implementation of the study, data collection, event fixation, and statistical analysis. However, approval of the study sponsor should be obtained for presentation in scientific meetings and submission of papers. Dr Hirotoshi Watanabe has received honoraria from Abbott Medical, Abiomed, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Kowa, Pfizer, and Otsuka; and has received support for attending meetings from Abbott Medical. Dr Morimoto has received lecture fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Japan Lifeline, Kowa, Kyocera, Novartis, and Toray; has received manuscript fees from Bristol Myers Squibb and Kowa; and has participated on an advisory board for Sanofi. Dr Natsuaki has received honoraria from Abbott Medical. Dr Suzuki has received honoraria from Abbott Medical. Dr Tanabe has received honoraria from Abbott Medical, AstraZeneca, Boston Scientific, Daiichi Sankyo, Japan Lifeline, and Terumo; and has participated on an advisory board for Abbott. Dr Morino has received honoraria from Abbott Medical. Dr Kadota has received honoraria from Abbott Medical. Dr Furukawa has received honoraria from Bayer, Daiichi Sankyo, and Sanofi. Dr Nakagawa has received a research grant from Abbott Medical; has received honoraria from Abbott Medical and Daiichi Sankyo; and has participated on an advisory board for Abbott. Dr Kimura has received research grants from Abbott Medical and Boston Scientific; has received honoraria from Abbott Medical, Boston Scientific, Daiichi Sankyo, Sanofi, and Terumo; and has participated on advisory boards for Abbott Medical, Boston Scientific, and Sanofi. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.
Références
BMJ. 2021 Jun 16;373:n1332
pubmed: 34135011
N Engl J Med. 2019 Nov 21;381(21):2032-2042
pubmed: 31556978
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 May 1;97(6):E758-E770
pubmed: 33064372
Eur Heart J. 2021 Dec 1;42(45):4624-4634
pubmed: 34662382
Circ J. 2020 Apr 24;84(5):831-865
pubmed: 32173684
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2021 Jan;36(1):91-103
pubmed: 32086787
Circ J. 2021 Oct 25;85(11):1928-1941
pubmed: 33907052
Eur Heart J. 2019 Aug 14;40(31):2632-2653
pubmed: 31116395
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Jan 18;79(2):e21-e129
pubmed: 34895950
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Nov;12(11):e008307
pubmed: 31707804
JAMA. 2019 Jun 25;321(24):2428-2437
pubmed: 31237645
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Oct 25;68(17):1851-1864
pubmed: 27595509
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Sep 13;14(17):1870-1883
pubmed: 34503737
Circulation. 2007 May 1;115(17):2344-51
pubmed: 17470709
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Feb 22;14(4):444-456
pubmed: 33602441
JAMA Cardiol. 2022 Apr 01;7(4):407-417
pubmed: 35234821
Lancet. 2018 Sep 15;392(10151):940-949
pubmed: 30166073
Eur Heart J. 2021 Apr 7;42(14):1289-1367
pubmed: 32860058
Circulation. 2019 Dec 3;140(23):1957-1959
pubmed: 31560216
N Engl J Med. 2021 Oct 28;385(18):1643-1655
pubmed: 34449185
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Aug;15(8):e012004
pubmed: 35912647
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Jun 2;75(21):2711-2722
pubmed: 32466887
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Feb;14(2):e010007
pubmed: 33541100
Am J Cardiol. 2020 Oct 15;133:61-70
pubmed: 32811654
JAMA. 2020 Jun 16;323(23):2407-2416
pubmed: 32543684
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988 Jan;11(1):1-11
pubmed: 3121710
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2014 Oct;11(10):597-606
pubmed: 25154978
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 May;14(5):e010384
pubmed: 34003662
JAMA. 2019 Jun 25;321(24):2414-2427
pubmed: 31237644