The Value of Tumour Markers in the Detection of Relapse-Lessons Learned from the Swiss Austrian German Testicular Cancer Cohort Study.
Alpha-fetoprotein
Beta human chorionic gonadotropin
Lactate dehydrogenase
Testicular cancer follow-up
Tumour markers
Journal
European urology open science
ISSN: 2666-1683
Titre abrégé: Eur Urol Open Sci
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101771568
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2023
Apr 2023
Historique:
accepted:
27
01
2023
entrez:
6
3
2023
pubmed:
7
3
2023
medline:
7
3
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The tumour markers alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), beta human chorionic gonadotropin (βHCG), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) have established roles in the management and follow-up of testicular cancer. While a tumour marker rise can serve as an indicator of relapse, the frequency of false-positive marker events has not been studied systematically in larger cohorts. We assessed the validity of serum tumour markers for the detection of relapse in the Swiss Austrian German Testicular Cancer Cohort Study (SAG TCCS). This registry was set up to answer questions on the diagnostic performance and impact of imaging and laboratory tests in the management of testicular cancer, and has included 948 patients between January 2014 and July 2021.A total of 793 patients with a median follow-up of 29.0 mo were included. In total, 71 patients (8.9%) had a proven relapse, which was marker positive in 31 patients (43.6%). Of all patients, 124 (15.6%) had an event of a false-positive marker elevation. The positive predictive value (PPV) of the markers was limited, highest for βHCG (33.8%) and lowest for LDH (9.4%). PPV tended to increase with higher levels of elevation. These findings underline the limited accuracy of the conventional tumour markers to indicate or rule out a relapse. Especially, LDH as part of routine follow-up should be questioned. With the diagnosis of testicular cancer, the three tumour markers alpha-fetoprotein, beta human chorionic gonadotropin, and lactate dehydrogenase are routinely measured during follow-up to monitor for relapse. We demonstrate that these markers are often falsely elevated, and, by contrast, many patients do not have marker elevations despite a relapse. The results of this study can lead to improved use of these tumour markers during follow-up of testis cancer patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36874175
doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2023.01.013
pii: S2666-1683(23)00102-7
pmc: PMC9976201
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
57-60Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
© 2023 The Author(s).
Références
J Urol. 2000 Mar;163(3):796-801
pubmed: 10687980
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Jun 1;37(16):1412-1423
pubmed: 30875280
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Jul 1;32(19):2114-5
pubmed: 24841979
Urology. 1987 Sep;30(3):252-4
pubmed: 2442873
Br J Cancer. 2022 May;126(8):1140-1144
pubmed: 34912073
Eur Urol. 2021 Oct;80(4):456-466
pubmed: 34175151
Clin Chem. 2007 Aug;53(8):1560-1
pubmed: 17644799
Swiss Med Wkly. 2010 Jun 26;140(25-26):356-69
pubmed: 20544409
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Jul 10;28(20):3388-404
pubmed: 20530278
Eur Urol. 2021 Jan;79(1):16-19
pubmed: 33158661