The concept, influence, and mechanism of human work interruptions based on the grounded theory.

affective responses behavioral changes cognitive appraisals grounded theory human work interruptions

Journal

Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2023
Historique:
received: 14 09 2022
accepted: 30 01 2023
entrez: 6 3 2023
pubmed: 7 3 2023
medline: 7 3 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

With the development of mobile communication technology and the transformation of work methods and modes, work interruptions have become ubiquitous challenges for employees in the workplace. Less attention has been paid to work interruptions in China, especially the research on human work interruptions, which is different from virtual work interruptions. The present study carried out an in-depth interview with 29 employees. Based on the grounded theory method, a psychological and behavioral mechanism model of employees facing human work interruptions, namely, the "human work interruptions-cognitive appraisals-affective responses-behavioral changes" model, was constructed. It is found that (1) cognitive appraisals are the causes of different affective responses and behavioral changes of human work interruptions; (2) cognitive appraisals are feedback behaviors that refer to the reappraisals of the effectiveness and appropriateness of individuals' affective responses and behavioral changes; and (3) personal traits and environmental characteristics at work influence the affective responses and behavioral changes of human work interruptions at the individual and organizational level. The model constructed in this study further extends the interruption theory and provides implications on how to process human work interruptions in human resource management practice.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36874796
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1044233
pmc: PMC9978345
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1044233

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Pan, Zhao and Shen.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

Work. 2019;62(4):553-561
pubmed: 31104041
J Appl Psychol. 2019 Jan;104(1):19-33
pubmed: 30221954
Ergonomics. 2015;58(5):852-6
pubmed: 25537689
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Dec 10;16(24):
pubmed: 31835588
Psychol Rep. 1972 Oct;31(2):559-64
pubmed: 5081345
Hum Factors. 2014 Nov;56(7):1262-71
pubmed: 25490806
BMJ Qual Saf. 2011 Jun;20(6):491-7
pubmed: 21216793
J Appl Psychol. 2018 Mar;103(3):300-312
pubmed: 29154579
Am J Psychol. 2017 Summer;130(2):163-181
pubmed: 29461714
Hum Factors. 2018 Mar;60(2):222-235
pubmed: 29131659
J Appl Psychol. 2021 Oct;106(10):1448-1465
pubmed: 34855421
J Occup Health Psychol. 2018 Jul;23(3):417-427
pubmed: 29144151
Stress Health. 2018 Feb;34(1):102-114
pubmed: 28639737
Qual Saf Health Care. 2010 Aug;19(4):304-12
pubmed: 20378621
Psychol Rev. 1962 Sep;69:379-99
pubmed: 14497895
J Pers. 2006 Feb;74(1):9-46
pubmed: 16451225

Auteurs

Xiao Pan (X)

Glorious Sun School of Business and Management, Donghua University, Shanghai, China.
School of Business, Nantong Institute of Technology, Nantong, China.

Xiaokang Zhao (X)

Glorious Sun School of Business and Management, Donghua University, Shanghai, China.

Huali Shen (H)

Glorious Sun School of Business and Management, Donghua University, Shanghai, China.

Classifications MeSH