MUC-FIRE: Study protocol for a randomized multicenter open-label controlled trial to show that MUCous FIstula REfeeding reduces the time from enterostomy closure to full enteral feeds.
Focal intestinal perforation
Ileostomy
Jejunostomy
Mucous fistula refeeding
Necrotizing enterocolitis
Randomized trial
Journal
Contemporary clinical trials communications
ISSN: 2451-8654
Titre abrégé: Contemp Clin Trials Commun
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101671157
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2023
Apr 2023
Historique:
received:
03
06
2022
revised:
07
02
2023
accepted:
17
02
2023
entrez:
6
3
2023
pubmed:
7
3
2023
medline:
7
3
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
After enterostomy creation, the distal bowel to the ostomy is excluded from the physiologic passage of stool, nutrient uptake, and growth of this intestinal section. Those infants frequently require long-term parenteral nutrition, continued after enterostomy reversal due to the notable diameter discrepancy of the proximal and distal bowel. Previous studies have shown that mucous fistula refeeding (MFR) results in faster weight gain in infants. The aim of the randomized multicenter open-label controlled The MUC-FIRE trial will be the first prospective randomized trial to investigate the benefits and disadvantages of MFR in infants. The results of the trial are expected to provide an evidence-based foundation for guidelines in pediatric surgical centers worldwide. The trial has been registered at clinicaltrials.gov (number: NCT03469609, date of registration: March 19, 2018; last update: January 20, 2023, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03469609?term=NCT03469609&draw=2&rank=1).
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
After enterostomy creation, the distal bowel to the ostomy is excluded from the physiologic passage of stool, nutrient uptake, and growth of this intestinal section. Those infants frequently require long-term parenteral nutrition, continued after enterostomy reversal due to the notable diameter discrepancy of the proximal and distal bowel. Previous studies have shown that mucous fistula refeeding (MFR) results in faster weight gain in infants. The aim of the randomized multicenter open-label controlled
Discussion
UNASSIGNED
The MUC-FIRE trial will be the first prospective randomized trial to investigate the benefits and disadvantages of MFR in infants. The results of the trial are expected to provide an evidence-based foundation for guidelines in pediatric surgical centers worldwide.
Trial registration
UNASSIGNED
The trial has been registered at clinicaltrials.gov (number: NCT03469609, date of registration: March 19, 2018; last update: January 20, 2023, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03469609?term=NCT03469609&draw=2&rank=1).
Identifiants
pubmed: 36875554
doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2023.101096
pii: S2451-8654(23)00042-X
pmc: PMC9974420
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03469609']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
101096Informations de copyright
© 2023 The Authors.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Références
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2005 Jan-Feb;34(1):98-108
pubmed: 15673653
Pediatr Surg Int. 2019 Oct;35(10):1101-1107
pubmed: 31396740
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2004 Jul;39(1):43-5
pubmed: 15187779
J Pediatr Surg. 2009 Jun;44(6):1072-5; discussion 1075-6
pubmed: 19524719
J Pediatr Surg. 1999 Jul;34(7):1100-3
pubmed: 10442599
J Perinatol. 2011 Aug;31(8):519-23
pubmed: 21273988
CMAJ. 1995 Jun 1;152(11):1765-85
pubmed: 7773894
N Engl J Med. 1988 Mar 17;318(11):703-7
pubmed: 3125436
J Pediatr Surg. 2015 May;50(5):779-82
pubmed: 25783364
J Neonatal Surg. 2017 Jan 1;6(1):4
pubmed: 28083490
J Pediatr Surg. 2016 Nov;51(11):1759-1765
pubmed: 27614807
Adv Neonatal Care. 2003 Dec;3(6):258-68; quiz 269-71
pubmed: 14695498
BMJ. 2013 Jan 08;346:e7586
pubmed: 23303884
J Pediatr Surg. 2016 Dec;51(12):1914-1916
pubmed: 27670958
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2006 Aug;43(2):267-70
pubmed: 16878000