Impact of educational and psychological interventions compared with standard care in college/university students with autism spectrum disorder: a systematic review protocol.
Journal
JBI evidence synthesis
ISSN: 2689-8381
Titre abrégé: JBI Evid Synth
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101764819
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 06 2023
01 06 2023
Historique:
medline:
8
6
2023
pubmed:
7
3
2023
entrez:
6
3
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
This review will explore the impact of educational and psychological interventions on educational, social, behavioral, and mental health outcomes in students with autism spectrum disorder in tertiary education. This systematic review will inform a new guideline on support for students with autism spectrum disorder in the tertiary education environment. These students face multiple educational, behavioral, social, and health-related problems that require effective interventions. Participants are students with autism spectrum disorder in a tertiary education study program. Educational and psychological interventions will be included, such as accommodations, meta-cognitive and self-regulation training, psychological counseling, social skills training, and peer-mentoring/academic coaching. The comparator will be standard care. The study outcomes will include academic drop-out rates and evaluations, learning skills, social skills and social engagement, behavior, mental health (including anxiety, stress, and depression), and employment after graduation. This review will consider quantitative studies only. A 3-step search strategy will be used to find both published and unpublished studies in MEDLINE, CINAHL, APA PsycINFO, SocINDEX, Web of Science, Clinical Trials, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, Open Dissertations, ERIC, WHO ICRTP, and Google Scholar. There will be no date or language limitations. All stages of article screening, critical appraisal, and data extraction will be conducted by 2 independent reviewers with the resolution of any disagreements done via consensus or through a senior reviewer. If possible, the included studies will be pooled using meta-analysis. The degree of certainty of the evidence will be assessed according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. PROSPERO CRD42022323554.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36876403
doi: 10.11124/JBIES-22-00251
pii: 02174543-202306000-00010
pmc: PMC10246882
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1299-1309Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of JBI.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
MK is an associate editor for JBI Evidence Synthesis. ZM is a paid employee of JBI, The University of Adelaide. MK and ZM were not involved in the editorial processing of this manuscript. The other authors declare no conflict of interest.
Références
American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5-TR, 5th edn, Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association Publishing; 2022.
World Health Organization. ICD-11 for mortality and morbidity statistics [internet]. WHO; n.d. [cited 2022 Jun 15];Available from: https://icd.who.int/browse11/l-m/en#/http://id.who.int/icd/entity/437815624 .
Zeidan J, Fombonne E, Scorah J, Ibrahim A, Durkin MS, Saxena S, et al. Global prevalence of autism: a systematic review update. Autism Res 2022;15(5):778–790.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Autism data visualization tool [internet]. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services: CDC; 2021 [cited 2022 Jun 15]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/autism/data/
American Psychiatric Association, American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-IV-TR, 4th ed. American Psychiatric Association; 2000.
Xie S, Karlsson H, Dalman C, Widman L, Rai D, Gardner RM, et al. The familial risk of autism spectrum disorder with and without intellectual disability. Autism Res 2020;13(12):2242–2250.
Barnhill GP. Supporting students with Asperger Syndrome on college campuses: current practices. Focus Autism Dev Disabil 2016;31(1):3–15.
White SW, Ollendick TH, Bray BC. College students on the autism spectrum: prevalence and associated problems. Autism 2011;15(6):683–701.
National Joint Committee on Learning Disabilities. Learning disabilities and young children: identification and intervention. A report from the National Joint Committee on Learning Disabilities, October, 2006. Learn Disabil Q 2007;30(1):63–72.
Kuder SJ, Accardo A. What works for college students with autism spectrum disorder. J Autism Dev Disord 2018;48(3):722–731.
Office for Civil Rights (ED), Washington, DC. Free appropriate public education for students with handicaps: requirements under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973[M]. ERIC Clearinghouse; 1996.
White SW, Richey JA, Gracanin D, Coffman M, Elias R, LaConte S, et al. Psychosocial and computer-assisted intervention for college students with Autism Spectrum Disorder: preliminary support for feasibility. Educ Train Autism Dev Diabil 2016;51(3):307–317.
Gillespie-Lynch K, Bublitz D, Donachie A, Wong V, Brooks PJ, D’Onofrio J. “For a long time our voices have been hushed”: using student perspectives to develop supports for neurodiverse college students. Front Psychol 2017;8:544.
Crabtree LA, Demchick BB. Young adults on the autism spectrum: perceived effects of participation in a university-based challenge course program in the community. Occup Ther Ment Health 2015;31(3):253–265.
Harrop LJ. Self-determination skill development: a qualitative exploration of college students with autism spectrum disorders [dissertation]. Arizona State University; 2017.
Beck AT, Epstein N, Brown G, Steer R. Beck anxiety inventory. J Consult Clin Psychol 1993;56(6):893–897.
Hamilton M. The assessment of anxiety states by rating. Br J Med Psychol 1959;32(1):50–55.
Schünemann H, Brożek J, Guyatt G, Oxman A, editors. GRADE handbook for grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations [internet]. Updated October 2013. The GRADE Working Group, 2013. Available from: https://gdt.gradepro.org/app/handbook/handbook.html .
Klugar M, Klugarová J, Pokorná A, Líčeník R, Dolanová D, Mužík J, et al. Czech national project ‘Clinical Practice Guidelines’ methodology and current results. JBI Evid Implement 2019;17(suppl 1):S3–S5.
Fairchild LA, Powell MB, Gadke DL, Spencer JC, Stratton KK. Increasing social engagement among college students with autism. Adv Autism 2020;6(2):83–93.
Tufanaru C, Munn Z, Aromataris E, Campbell J, Hopp L Aromataris E, Munn Z. Chapter 3: Systematic reviews of effectiveness. JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis [internet]. JBI; 2020 [cited 2022 Sep 12]. Available from: https://synthesismanual.jbi.global .
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Syst Rev 2021;10(1):89.
Munn Z, Aromataris E, Tufanaru C, Stern C, Porritt K, Farrow J, et al. The development of software to support multiple systematic review types: the Joanna Briggs Institute System for the Unified Management, Assessment and Review of Information (JBI SUMARI). JBI Evid Implement 2019;17(1):36–43.
Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page M, et al. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 6.3 [internet]. Cochrane, 2022 [cited 2022 Sep 10]. Available from: www.training.cochrane.org/handbook .
Tufanaru C, Munn Z, Stephenson M, Aromataris E. Fixed or random effects meta-analysis? Common methodological issues in systematic reviews of effectiveness. Int J Evid Based Healthc 2015;13(3):196–207.
Barker TH, Migliavaca CB, Stein C, Colpani V, Falavigna M, Aromatarus E, et al. Conducting proportional meta-analysis in different types of systematic reviews: a guide for synthesisers of evidence. BMC Med Res Methodol 2021;21(1):1–9.
Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Jüni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 2011;343:d5928.
Harbord RM, Egger M, Sterne JA. A modified test for small-study effects in meta-analyses of controlled trials with binary endpoints. Stat Med 2006;25(20):3443–3457.