Should authorship on scientific publications be treated as a right?

Ethics Ethics- Research

Journal

Journal of medical ethics
ISSN: 1473-4257
Titre abrégé: J Med Ethics
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7513619

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Nov 2023
Historique:
received: 22 12 2022
accepted: 21 02 2023
pubmed: 7 3 2023
medline: 7 3 2023
entrez: 6 3 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Sometimes researchers explicitly or implicitly conceive of authorship in terms of moral or ethical rights to authorship when they are dealing with authorship issues. Because treating authorship as a right can encourage unethical behaviours, such as honorary and ghost authorship, buying and selling authorship, and unfair treatment of researchers, we recommend that researchers not conceive of authorship in this way but view it as a description about contributions to research. However, we acknowledge that the arguments we have given for this position are largely speculative and that more empirical research is needed to better ascertain the benefits and risks of treating authorship on scientific publications as a right.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36878675
pii: jme-2022-108874
doi: 10.1136/jme-2022-108874
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

776-778

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: None declared.

Auteurs

David B Resnik (DB)

NIEHS, National Institutes of Health, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA resnikd@niehs.nih.gov.

Elise Smith (E)

Department of Preventive Medicine and Population Health, University of Texas Medical Branch, Glaveston, Texas, USA.

Classifications MeSH