Preventing muscle wasting: pro-insulin C-peptide prevents loss in muscle mass in streptozotocin-diabetic rats.
C-peptide
atrophy
muscle mass
muscle-specific E3 ubiquitin ligase
type 1 diabetes
Journal
Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle
ISSN: 2190-6009
Titre abrégé: J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101552883
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2023
04 2023
Historique:
revised:
01
12
2022
received:
01
04
2022
accepted:
07
02
2023
medline:
4
4
2023
pubmed:
7
3
2023
entrez:
6
3
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
C-peptide therapy exerts several positive actions on nerves, vasculature, smooth muscle relaxation, kidney function and bone. To date, the role of C-peptide in preventing type 1 diabetes-related muscle atrophy has not been investigated. Our aim was to evaluate if C-peptide infusion prevents muscle wasting in diabetic rats. Twenty-three male Wistar rats were randomly divided into three groups: normal control group, diabetic group and diabetic group plus C-peptide. Diabetes was induced by streptozotocin injection, and C-peptide was administered subcutaneously for 6 weeks. The blood samples were obtained at baseline, before streptozotocin injection and at the end of the study to assess C-peptide, ubiquitin and other laboratory parameters. We also tested the ability of C-peptide to regulate the skeletal muscle mass, the ubiquitin-proteasome system, the autophagy pathway as well as to improve muscle quality. C-peptide administration reversed hyperglycaemia (P = 0.02) and hypertriglyceridaemia (P = 0.01) in diabetic plus C-peptide rats compared with diabetic control rats. The diabetic-control animals displayed a lower weight of the muscles in the lower limb considered individually than the control rats and the diabetic plus C-peptide rats (P = 0.03; P = 0.03; P = 0.04; P = 0.004, respectively). The diabetic-control rats presented a significantly higher serum concentration of ubiquitin compared with the diabetic plus C-peptide and the control animals (P = 0.02 and P = 0.01). In muscles of the lower limb, the pAmpk expression was higher in the diabetic plus C-peptide than the diabetic-control rats (in the gastrocnemius, P = 0.002; in the tibialis anterior P = 0.005). The protein expression of Atrogin-1 in gastrocnemius and tibialis was lower in the diabetic plus C-peptide than in diabetic-control rats (P = 0.02, P = 0.03). After 42 days, the cross-sectional area in the gastrocnemius of the diabetic plus C-peptide group had been reduced by 6.6% while the diabetic-control rats had a 39.5% reduction compared with the control animals (P = 0.02). The cross-sectional area of the tibialis and the extensor digitorum longus muscles was reduced, in the diabetic plus C-peptide rats, by 10% and 11%, respectively, while the diabetic-control group had a reduction of 65% and 45% compared with the control animals (both P < 0.0001). Similar results were obtained for the minimum Feret's diameter and perimeter. C-peptide administration in rats could protect skeletal muscle mass from atrophy induced by type 1 diabetes mellitus. Our findings could suggest that targeting the ubiquitin-proteasome system, Ampk and muscle-specific E3 ubiquitin ligases such as Atrogin-1 and Traf6 may be an effective strategy for molecular and clinical intervention in the muscle wasting pathological process in T1DM.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
C-peptide therapy exerts several positive actions on nerves, vasculature, smooth muscle relaxation, kidney function and bone. To date, the role of C-peptide in preventing type 1 diabetes-related muscle atrophy has not been investigated. Our aim was to evaluate if C-peptide infusion prevents muscle wasting in diabetic rats.
METHODS
Twenty-three male Wistar rats were randomly divided into three groups: normal control group, diabetic group and diabetic group plus C-peptide. Diabetes was induced by streptozotocin injection, and C-peptide was administered subcutaneously for 6 weeks. The blood samples were obtained at baseline, before streptozotocin injection and at the end of the study to assess C-peptide, ubiquitin and other laboratory parameters. We also tested the ability of C-peptide to regulate the skeletal muscle mass, the ubiquitin-proteasome system, the autophagy pathway as well as to improve muscle quality.
RESULTS
C-peptide administration reversed hyperglycaemia (P = 0.02) and hypertriglyceridaemia (P = 0.01) in diabetic plus C-peptide rats compared with diabetic control rats. The diabetic-control animals displayed a lower weight of the muscles in the lower limb considered individually than the control rats and the diabetic plus C-peptide rats (P = 0.03; P = 0.03; P = 0.04; P = 0.004, respectively). The diabetic-control rats presented a significantly higher serum concentration of ubiquitin compared with the diabetic plus C-peptide and the control animals (P = 0.02 and P = 0.01). In muscles of the lower limb, the pAmpk expression was higher in the diabetic plus C-peptide than the diabetic-control rats (in the gastrocnemius, P = 0.002; in the tibialis anterior P = 0.005). The protein expression of Atrogin-1 in gastrocnemius and tibialis was lower in the diabetic plus C-peptide than in diabetic-control rats (P = 0.02, P = 0.03). After 42 days, the cross-sectional area in the gastrocnemius of the diabetic plus C-peptide group had been reduced by 6.6% while the diabetic-control rats had a 39.5% reduction compared with the control animals (P = 0.02). The cross-sectional area of the tibialis and the extensor digitorum longus muscles was reduced, in the diabetic plus C-peptide rats, by 10% and 11%, respectively, while the diabetic-control group had a reduction of 65% and 45% compared with the control animals (both P < 0.0001). Similar results were obtained for the minimum Feret's diameter and perimeter.
CONCLUSIONS
C-peptide administration in rats could protect skeletal muscle mass from atrophy induced by type 1 diabetes mellitus. Our findings could suggest that targeting the ubiquitin-proteasome system, Ampk and muscle-specific E3 ubiquitin ligases such as Atrogin-1 and Traf6 may be an effective strategy for molecular and clinical intervention in the muscle wasting pathological process in T1DM.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36878894
doi: 10.1002/jcsm.13210
pmc: PMC10067479
doi:
Substances chimiques
C-Peptide
0
Streptozocin
5W494URQ81
Proteasome Endopeptidase Complex
EC 3.4.25.1
Ubiquitin
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1117-1129Informations de copyright
© 2023 The Authors. Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society on Sarcopenia, Cachexia and Wasting Disorders.
Références
Cell Metab. 2014 Dec 2;20(6):939-52
pubmed: 25448702
Bone. 2018 Jan;106:22-27
pubmed: 29017892
Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2013 Feb 25;366(2):135-51
pubmed: 22750049
Cell Rep. 2016 Oct 4;17(2):514-526
pubmed: 27705798
Cell. 1987 Dec 24;51(6):987-1000
pubmed: 3690668
Acta Diabetol. 2017 Jun;54(6):543-550
pubmed: 28285381
J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2003 Jul;62(7):765-79
pubmed: 12901702
J Physiol. 2012 Mar 1;590(5):1069-76
pubmed: 22199166
J Biol Chem. 1975 Jan 10;250(1):290-8
pubmed: 1141208
Diabet Med. 2002 May;19(5):417-23
pubmed: 12027931
Diabetes. 2013 Mar;62(3):944-52
pubmed: 23364451
Diabet Med. 1996 Jan;13(1):40-6
pubmed: 8741811
J Cell Biol. 2010 Dec 27;191(7):1395-411
pubmed: 21187332
Oncol Rep. 2015 May;33(5):2261-8
pubmed: 25760630
Endocrine. 2017 Dec;58(3):408-412
pubmed: 28374151
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2010 Jan;108(1):7-13
pubmed: 19779156
J Cell Sci. 2001 Aug;114(Pt 16):2903-10
pubmed: 11686294
J Clin Invest. 1996 Oct 15;98(8):1703-8
pubmed: 8878419
Biotechniques. 1993 Sep;15(3):532-4, 536-7
pubmed: 7692896
Diabetologia. 2005 Jan;48(1):187-97
pubmed: 15624099
J Biol Chem. 1974 Jul 25;249(14):4510-4
pubmed: 4276460
Biomed Pharmacother. 2021 Jan;133:110977
pubmed: 33249280
J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2023 Apr;14(2):1117-1129
pubmed: 36878894
J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2021 Dec;12(6):2259-2261
pubmed: 34904399
Cell Mol Biol Lett. 2016 Dec 13;21:29
pubmed: 28536631
Pediatr Diabetes. 2011 Jun;12(4 Pt 1):345-64
pubmed: 20860561
Life Sci. 2011 Jul 4;89(1-2):44-9
pubmed: 21620866
Nutrients. 2021 Jun 02;13(6):
pubmed: 34199375
Calcif Tissue Int. 2020 Sep;107(3):266-280
pubmed: 32607636
Am J Physiol. 1999 May;276(5):C1132-8
pubmed: 10329962
Mol Cell Biochem. 2001 Jul;223(1-2):147-57
pubmed: 11681716
Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2007 Jul;71(7):1650-6
pubmed: 17617726
Diabetes. 2019 Mar;68(3):556-570
pubmed: 30523026
Cell. 2004 Apr 30;117(3):399-412
pubmed: 15109499
Exp Physiol. 2015 Sep;100(9):1052-63
pubmed: 25998196
Pediatr Res. 2005 Aug;58(2):229-34
pubmed: 16006430
Diabetes. 2013 Nov;62(11):3851-62
pubmed: 23884890
Diabetes. 2014 Feb;63(2):739-48
pubmed: 24089509
Curr Opin Neurol. 2017 Oct;30(5):545-552
pubmed: 28665810