Large-scale agricultural burning and cardiorespiratory emergency department visits in the U.S. state of Kansas.


Journal

Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology
ISSN: 1559-064X
Titre abrégé: J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101262796

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 2023
Historique:
received: 31 08 2022
accepted: 10 02 2023
revised: 10 02 2023
medline: 7 8 2023
pubmed: 7 3 2023
entrez: 6 3 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Prescribed agricultural burning is a common land management practice, but little is known about the health effects from the resulting smoke exposure. To examine the association between smoke from prescribed burning and cardiorespiratory outcomes in the U.S. state of Kansas. We analyzed a zip code-level, daily time series of primary cardiorespiratory emergency department (ED) visits for February-May (months when prescribed burning is common in Kansas) in the years 2009-2011 (n = 109,220). Given limited monitoring data, we formulated a measure of smoke exposure using non-traditional datasets, including fire radiative power and locational attributes from remote sensing data sources. We then assigned a population-weighted potential smoke impact factor (PSIF) to each zip code, based on fire intensity, smoke transport, and fire proximity. We used Poisson generalized linear models to estimate the association between PSIF on the same day and in the past 3 days and asthma, respiratory including asthma, and cardiovascular ED visits. During the study period, prescribed burning took place on approximately 8 million acres in Kansas. Same-day PSIF was associated with a 7% increase in the rate of asthma ED visits when adjusting for month, year, zip code, meteorology, day of week, holidays, and correlation within zip codes (rate ratio [RR]: 1.07; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01, 1.13). Same-day PSIF was not associated with a combined outcome of respiratory ED visits (RR [95% CI]: 0.99 [0.97, 1.02]), or cardiovascular ED visits (RR [95% CI]: 1.01 [0.98, 1.04]). There was no consistent association between PSIF during the past 3 days and any of the outcomes. These results suggest an association between smoke exposure and asthma ED visits on the same day. Elucidating these associations will help guide public health programs that address population-level exposure to smoke from prescribed burning.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Prescribed agricultural burning is a common land management practice, but little is known about the health effects from the resulting smoke exposure.
OBJECTIVE
To examine the association between smoke from prescribed burning and cardiorespiratory outcomes in the U.S. state of Kansas.
METHODS
We analyzed a zip code-level, daily time series of primary cardiorespiratory emergency department (ED) visits for February-May (months when prescribed burning is common in Kansas) in the years 2009-2011 (n = 109,220). Given limited monitoring data, we formulated a measure of smoke exposure using non-traditional datasets, including fire radiative power and locational attributes from remote sensing data sources. We then assigned a population-weighted potential smoke impact factor (PSIF) to each zip code, based on fire intensity, smoke transport, and fire proximity. We used Poisson generalized linear models to estimate the association between PSIF on the same day and in the past 3 days and asthma, respiratory including asthma, and cardiovascular ED visits.
RESULTS
During the study period, prescribed burning took place on approximately 8 million acres in Kansas. Same-day PSIF was associated with a 7% increase in the rate of asthma ED visits when adjusting for month, year, zip code, meteorology, day of week, holidays, and correlation within zip codes (rate ratio [RR]: 1.07; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01, 1.13). Same-day PSIF was not associated with a combined outcome of respiratory ED visits (RR [95% CI]: 0.99 [0.97, 1.02]), or cardiovascular ED visits (RR [95% CI]: 1.01 [0.98, 1.04]). There was no consistent association between PSIF during the past 3 days and any of the outcomes.
SIGNIFICANCE
These results suggest an association between smoke exposure and asthma ED visits on the same day. Elucidating these associations will help guide public health programs that address population-level exposure to smoke from prescribed burning.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36878971
doi: 10.1038/s41370-023-00531-3
pii: 10.1038/s41370-023-00531-3
pmc: PMC10440224
mid: NIHMS1873771
doi:

Substances chimiques

Air Pollutants 0
Particulate Matter 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

663-669

Subventions

Organisme : Intramural CDC HHS
ID : CC999999
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

© 2023. This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply.

Références

Sci Total Environ. 2018 May 15;624:586-595
pubmed: 29272827
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2015 May;65(5):592-8
pubmed: 25947317
Environ Sci Technol. 2008 May 15;42(10):3676-82
pubmed: 18546707
Transl Anim Sci. 2021 May 09;5(2):txab077
pubmed: 34632310
Circulation. 2022 Feb 22;145(8):e153-e639
pubmed: 35078371
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 31;9(7):e103423
pubmed: 25077487
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014 Sep 03;11(9):9101-41
pubmed: 25192146
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2020 Jun;70(6):583-615
pubmed: 32240055
Epidemiology. 2017 Mar;28(2):197-206
pubmed: 27984424
Epidemiology. 2010 May;21(3):383-8
pubmed: 20335814
Am J Epidemiol. 2017 May 15;185(10):941-949
pubmed: 28430842
Atmosphere (Basel). 2019;10(8):1-464
pubmed: 31595190
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jun 29;16(13):
pubmed: 31261860
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2021 Sep 17;70(5):1-32
pubmed: 34529643
J Environ Monit. 2009 Mar;11(3):475-90
pubmed: 19280026
J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol. 1999 Jan-Feb;9(1):56-65
pubmed: 10189627
Epidemiology. 2011 Jan;22(1):59-67
pubmed: 21068669
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Nov 10;794:148712
pubmed: 34323750
Sci Total Environ. 2018 Jan 1;610-611:802-809
pubmed: 28826118
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2018 Sep 25;:
pubmed: 30252621
Environ Sci Technol. 2008 Apr 15;42(8):2767-72
pubmed: 18497121
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2004 Sep;54(9):1112-23
pubmed: 15468664

Auteurs

Audrey F Pennington (AF)

Asthma and Community Health Branch, Division of Environmental Health Science and Practice, National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA. isp5@cdc.gov.

Ambarish Vaidyanathan (A)

Climate and Health Program, Division of Environmental Health Science and Practice, National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Farah S Ahmed (FS)

Kansas Department of Health and Environment, Topeka, KS, USA.

Arie Manangan (A)

Climate and Health Program, Division of Environmental Health Science and Practice, National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Maria C Mirabelli (MC)

Asthma and Community Health Branch, Division of Environmental Health Science and Practice, National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Kanta Devi Sircar (KD)

Asthma and Community Health Branch, Division of Environmental Health Science and Practice, National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Commissioned Officers of the United States Public Health Services, Rockville, MD, USA.

Fuyuen Yip (F)

Commissioned Officers of the United States Public Health Services, Rockville, MD, USA.
Emergency Management, Radiation, and Chemical Branch, Division of Environmental Health Science and Practice, National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.

W Dana Flanders (WD)

Asthma and Community Health Branch, Division of Environmental Health Science and Practice, National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH