Evaluation of a continuing professional development strategy on COVID-19 for 10 000 health workers in Ghana: a two-pronged approach.
Continuing professional development
E-learning
Evaluation
Low-resource settings
Nursing education
Journal
Human resources for health
ISSN: 1478-4491
Titre abrégé: Hum Resour Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101170535
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 03 2023
06 03 2023
Historique:
received:
17
08
2022
accepted:
15
02
2023
entrez:
6
3
2023
pubmed:
7
3
2023
medline:
9
3
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
COVID-19 has created unprecedented challenges for health systems worldwide. Since the confirmation of the first COVID-19 case in Ghana in March 2020 Ghanian health workers have reported fear, stress, and low perceived preparedness to respond to COVID-19, with those who had not received adequate training at highest risk. Accordingly, the Paediatric Nursing Education Partnership COVID-19 Response project designed, implemented, and evaluated four open-access continuing professional development courses related to the pandemic, delivered through a two-pronged approach: e-learning and in-person. This manuscript presents an evaluation of the project's implementation and outcomes using data for a subset of Ghanaian health workers (n = 9966) who have taken the courses. Two questions were answered: first, the extent to which the design and implementation of this two-pronged strategy was successful and, second, outcomes associated with strengthening the capacity of health workers to respond to COVID-19. The methodology involved quantitative and qualitative survey data analysis and ongoing stakeholder consultation to interpret the results. Judged against the success criteria (reach, relevance, and efficiency) the implementation of the strategy was successful. The e-learning component reached 9250 health workers in 6 months. The in-person component took considerably more resources than e-learning but provided hands-on learning to 716 health workers who were more likely to experience barriers to accessing e-learning due to challenges around internet connectivity, or institutional capacity to offer training. After taking the courses, health workers' capacities (addressing misinformation, supporting individuals experiencing effects of the virus, recommending the vaccine, course-specific knowledge, and comfort with e-learning) improved. The effect size, however, varied depending on the course and the variable measured. Overall, participants were satisfied with the courses and found them relevant to their well-being and profession. An area for improvement was refining the content-to-delivery time ratio of the in-person course. Unstable internet connectivity and the high upfront cost of data to access and complete the course online were identified as barriers to e-learning. A two-pronged delivery approach leveraged distinct strengths of respective e-learning and in-person strategies to contribute to a successful continuing professional development initiative in the context of COVID-19.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
COVID-19 has created unprecedented challenges for health systems worldwide. Since the confirmation of the first COVID-19 case in Ghana in March 2020 Ghanian health workers have reported fear, stress, and low perceived preparedness to respond to COVID-19, with those who had not received adequate training at highest risk. Accordingly, the Paediatric Nursing Education Partnership COVID-19 Response project designed, implemented, and evaluated four open-access continuing professional development courses related to the pandemic, delivered through a two-pronged approach: e-learning and in-person.
METHODS
This manuscript presents an evaluation of the project's implementation and outcomes using data for a subset of Ghanaian health workers (n = 9966) who have taken the courses. Two questions were answered: first, the extent to which the design and implementation of this two-pronged strategy was successful and, second, outcomes associated with strengthening the capacity of health workers to respond to COVID-19. The methodology involved quantitative and qualitative survey data analysis and ongoing stakeholder consultation to interpret the results.
RESULTS
Judged against the success criteria (reach, relevance, and efficiency) the implementation of the strategy was successful. The e-learning component reached 9250 health workers in 6 months. The in-person component took considerably more resources than e-learning but provided hands-on learning to 716 health workers who were more likely to experience barriers to accessing e-learning due to challenges around internet connectivity, or institutional capacity to offer training. After taking the courses, health workers' capacities (addressing misinformation, supporting individuals experiencing effects of the virus, recommending the vaccine, course-specific knowledge, and comfort with e-learning) improved. The effect size, however, varied depending on the course and the variable measured. Overall, participants were satisfied with the courses and found them relevant to their well-being and profession. An area for improvement was refining the content-to-delivery time ratio of the in-person course. Unstable internet connectivity and the high upfront cost of data to access and complete the course online were identified as barriers to e-learning.
CONCLUSIONS
A two-pronged delivery approach leveraged distinct strengths of respective e-learning and in-person strategies to contribute to a successful continuing professional development initiative in the context of COVID-19.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36879262
doi: 10.1186/s12960-023-00804-w
pii: 10.1186/s12960-023-00804-w
pmc: PMC9987385
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
18Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Hum Resour Health. 2021 Jan 6;19(1):5
pubmed: 33407554
Comput Educ. 2020 Feb;145:103726
pubmed: 32565611
BMJ Glob Health. 2022 May;7(Suppl 1):
pubmed: 35589144
Hum Resour Health. 2022 May 16;20(1):43
pubmed: 35578284
BMC Nurs. 2021 Feb 16;20(1):32
pubmed: 33593320
Telemed J E Health. 2013 Apr;19(4):312-21
pubmed: 23472702
N Engl J Med. 2011 Jan 20;364(3):193-6
pubmed: 21158652
Hum Resour Health. 2013 Aug 14;11:37
pubmed: 23945073
BMC Nurs. 2018 Jan 31;17:3
pubmed: 29434521
Lancet. 2010 Dec 4;376(9756):1923-58
pubmed: 21112623
Int J Afr Nurs Sci. 2020;13:100258
pubmed: 33101975
Implement Sci. 2009 Aug 07;4:50
pubmed: 19664226
Acad Med. 2006 Mar;81(3):207-12
pubmed: 16501260
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Jan;6(1):
pubmed: 33452138
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011 Mar;38(2):65-76
pubmed: 20957426
JMIR Med Educ. 2021 Mar 11;7(1):e13681
pubmed: 33704073
Hum Resour Health. 2017 Dec 29;15(1):89
pubmed: 29284492
SAGE Open Med. 2021 Mar 12;9:20503121211000919
pubmed: 33786183
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2009 Winter;29(1):1-15
pubmed: 19288562
BMC Med Educ. 2017 Oct 10;17(1):183
pubmed: 29017521
Health Policy Plan. 2018 Apr 1;33(3):355-367
pubmed: 29325025