The impact of COVID-19 and national pandemic responses on health service utilisation in seven low- and middle-income countries.
Covid-19
Global public health
essential health services
health policy
time series modeling
Journal
Global health action
ISSN: 1654-9880
Titre abrégé: Glob Health Action
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101496665
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
31 12 2023
31 12 2023
Historique:
entrez:
7
3
2023
pubmed:
8
3
2023
medline:
10
3
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted health services worldwide, which may have led to increased mortality and secondary disease outbreaks. Disruptions vary by patient population, geographic area, and service. While many reasons have been put forward to explain disruptions, few studies have empirically investigated their causes. We quantify disruptions to outpatient services, facility-based deliveries, and family planning in seven low- and middle-income countries during the COVID-19 pandemic and quantify relationships between disruptions and the intensity of national pandemic responses. We leveraged routine data from 104 Partners In Health-supported facilities from January 2016 to December 2021. We first quantified COVID-19-related disruptions in each country by month using negative binomial time series models. We then modelled the relationship between disruptions and the intensity of national pandemic responses, as measured by the stringency index from the Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker. For all the studied countries, we observed at least one month with a significant decline in outpatient visits during the COVID-19 pandemic. We also observed significant cumulative drops in outpatient visits across all months in Lesotho, Liberia, Malawi, Rwanda, and Sierra Leone. A significant cumulative decrease in facility-based deliveries was observed in Haiti, Lesotho, Mexico, and Sierra Leone. No country had significant cumulative drops in family planning visits. For a 10-unit increase in the average monthly stringency index, the proportion deviation in monthly facility outpatient visits compared to expected fell by 3.9% (95% CI: -5.1%, -1.6%). No relationship between stringency of pandemic responses and utilisation was observed for facility-based deliveries or family planning. Context-specific strategies show the ability of health systems to sustain essential health services during the pandemic. The link between pandemic responses and healthcare utilisation can inform purposeful strategies to ensure communities have access to care and provide lessons for promoting the utilisation of health services elsewhere.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted health services worldwide, which may have led to increased mortality and secondary disease outbreaks. Disruptions vary by patient population, geographic area, and service. While many reasons have been put forward to explain disruptions, few studies have empirically investigated their causes.
OBJECTIVE
We quantify disruptions to outpatient services, facility-based deliveries, and family planning in seven low- and middle-income countries during the COVID-19 pandemic and quantify relationships between disruptions and the intensity of national pandemic responses.
METHODS
We leveraged routine data from 104 Partners In Health-supported facilities from January 2016 to December 2021. We first quantified COVID-19-related disruptions in each country by month using negative binomial time series models. We then modelled the relationship between disruptions and the intensity of national pandemic responses, as measured by the stringency index from the Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker.
RESULTS
For all the studied countries, we observed at least one month with a significant decline in outpatient visits during the COVID-19 pandemic. We also observed significant cumulative drops in outpatient visits across all months in Lesotho, Liberia, Malawi, Rwanda, and Sierra Leone. A significant cumulative decrease in facility-based deliveries was observed in Haiti, Lesotho, Mexico, and Sierra Leone. No country had significant cumulative drops in family planning visits. For a 10-unit increase in the average monthly stringency index, the proportion deviation in monthly facility outpatient visits compared to expected fell by 3.9% (95% CI: -5.1%, -1.6%). No relationship between stringency of pandemic responses and utilisation was observed for facility-based deliveries or family planning.
CONCLUSIONS
Context-specific strategies show the ability of health systems to sustain essential health services during the pandemic. The link between pandemic responses and healthcare utilisation can inform purposeful strategies to ensure communities have access to care and provide lessons for promoting the utilisation of health services elsewhere.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36880985
doi: 10.1080/16549716.2023.2178604
pmc: PMC10013493
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2178604Subventions
Organisme : CIHR
ID : 172675
Pays : Canada
Références
Int J Equity Health. 2021 Mar 15;20(1):77
pubmed: 33722225
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2021 Mar;152(3):444-445
pubmed: 33222215
Int J Epidemiol. 2021 Aug 30;50(4):1091-1102
pubmed: 34058004
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2021 Feb;152(2):231-235
pubmed: 33128794
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Oct;5(10):
pubmed: 33028699
Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Sep;8(9):e1116-e1117
pubmed: 32679037
Front Sociol. 2021 Apr 07;6:613042
pubmed: 33898553
BMJ Glob Health. 2022 Jan;7(1):
pubmed: 35012970
BMC Infect Dis. 2020 Jun 15;20(1):412
pubmed: 32536344
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Aug;6(8):
pubmed: 34452941
Public Health Action. 2021 Mar 21;11(1):12-21
pubmed: 33777716
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Jul;6(7):
pubmed: 34315776
BMJ Open. 2021 Mar 16;11(3):e045343
pubmed: 33727273
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 26;16(3):e0249214
pubmed: 33770120
Bull World Health Organ. 2022 Feb 01;100(2):115-126C
pubmed: 35125536
Int J Womens Health. 2020 Dec 08;12:1181-1188
pubmed: 33335430
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Oct;6(10):
pubmed: 34635552
Health Policy Plan. 2021 Aug 12;36(7):1140-1151
pubmed: 34146394
Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Oct;8(10):e1264-e1272
pubmed: 32687792
Lancet. 2020 Nov 14;396(10262):1539-1541
pubmed: 33096041
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jul 23;21(1):731
pubmed: 34301264
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 7;15(10):e0239797
pubmed: 33027272
PLoS Med. 2022 Aug 30;19(8):e1004070
pubmed: 36040910
Lancet. 2020 May 30;395(10238):1735-1738
pubmed: 32386564
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Sep;6(9):
pubmed: 34470746
Nat Med. 2022 Jun;28(6):1314-1324
pubmed: 35288697
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jul 26;21(1):740
pubmed: 34311716
BMJ Glob Health. 2022 May;7(5):
pubmed: 35501068
BMC Womens Health. 2021 Mar 19;21(1):112
pubmed: 33740975