Chemical identification and indexing in full-text articles: an overview of the NLM-Chem track at BioCreative VII.
Journal
Database : the journal of biological databases and curation
ISSN: 1758-0463
Titre abrégé: Database (Oxford)
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101517697
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 03 2023
07 03 2023
Historique:
received:
19
08
2022
revised:
06
01
2023
accepted:
15
02
2023
entrez:
7
3
2023
pubmed:
8
3
2023
medline:
10
3
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The BioCreative National Library of Medicine (NLM)-Chem track calls for a community effort to fine-tune automated recognition of chemical names in the biomedical literature. Chemicals are one of the most searched biomedical entities in PubMed, and-as highlighted during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic-their identification may significantly advance research in multiple biomedical subfields. While previous community challenges focused on identifying chemical names mentioned in titles and abstracts, the full text contains valuable additional detail. We, therefore, organized the BioCreative NLM-Chem track as a community effort to address automated chemical entity recognition in full-text articles. The track consisted of two tasks: (i) chemical identification and (ii) chemical indexing. The chemical identification task required predicting all chemicals mentioned in recently published full-text articles, both span [i.e. named entity recognition (NER)] and normalization (i.e. entity linking), using Medical Subject Headings (MeSH). The chemical indexing task required identifying which chemicals reflect topics for each article and should therefore appear in the listing of MeSH terms for the document in the MEDLINE article indexing. This manuscript summarizes the BioCreative NLM-Chem track and post-challenge experiments. We received a total of 85 submissions from 17 teams worldwide. The highest performance achieved for the chemical identification task was 0.8672 F-score (0.8759 precision and 0.8587 recall) for strict NER performance and 0.8136 F-score (0.8621 precision and 0.7702 recall) for strict normalization performance. The highest performance achieved for the chemical indexing task was 0.6073 F-score (0.7417 precision and 0.5141 recall). This community challenge demonstrated that (i) the current substantial achievements in deep learning technologies can be utilized to improve automated prediction accuracy further and (ii) the chemical indexing task is substantially more challenging. We look forward to further developing biomedical text-mining methods to respond to the rapid growth of biomedical literature. The NLM-Chem track dataset and other challenge materials are publicly available at https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/lu/BC7-NLM-Chem-track/. Database URL https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/lu/BC7-NLM-Chem-track/.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36882099
pii: 7071696
doi: 10.1093/database/baad005
pmc: PMC9991492
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Intramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
Published by Oxford University Press 2023. This work is written by (a) US Government employee(s) and is in the public domain in the US.
Références
Nucleic Acids Res. 2021 Jan 8;49(D1):D1388-D1395
pubmed: 33151290
Bull Med Libr Assoc. 2000 Jul;88(3):265-6
pubmed: 10928714
F1000Res. 2014 Apr 25;3:96
pubmed: 25254099
BMC Bioinformatics. 2017 Aug 15;18(1):368
pubmed: 28810903
Sci Data. 2019 May 10;6(1):52
pubmed: 31076572
J Cheminform. 2015 Jan 19;7(Suppl 1 Text mining for chemistry and the CHEMDNER track):S2
pubmed: 25810773
J Cheminform. 2016 Jun 10;8:32
pubmed: 27293485
Bioinformatics. 2020 Feb 15;36(4):1234-1240
pubmed: 31501885
Sci Data. 2021 Mar 25;8(1):91
pubmed: 33767203
AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc. 2020 May 30;2020:561-568
pubmed: 32477678
Nucleic Acids Res. 2019 Jul 2;47(W1):W587-W593
pubmed: 31114887
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Aug 13;28(9):1892-1899
pubmed: 34157094
BMC Bioinformatics. 2008 Sep 25;9:402
pubmed: 18817555
Patterns (N Y). 2023 Jan 13;4(1):100659
pubmed: 36471749
Bioinformatics. 2008 Jul 1;24(13):i268-76
pubmed: 18586724
Database (Oxford). 2016 May 09;2016:
pubmed: 27161011
J Cheminform. 2015 Jan 19;7(Suppl 1 Text mining for chemistry and the CHEMDNER track):S1
pubmed: 25810766
Database (Oxford). 2022 Dec 1;2022:
pubmed: 36458799
Database (Oxford). 2009;2009:bap018
pubmed: 20157491
Proc AMIA Symp. 2001;:17-21
pubmed: 11825149
Front Res Metr Anal. 2021 Mar 25;6:654438
pubmed: 33870071
J Cheminform. 2015 Jan 19;7(Suppl 1 Text mining for chemistry and the CHEMDNER track):S3
pubmed: 25810774
Genome Biol. 2008;9 Suppl 2:S2
pubmed: 18834493
PLoS Biol. 2020 Jun 1;18(6):e3000716
pubmed: 32479517
Nucleic Acids Res. 2004 Jan 1;32(Database issue):D267-70
pubmed: 14681409
BMC Bioinformatics. 2012 Jul 09;13:161
pubmed: 22776079
Nucleic Acids Res. 2021 Jan 8;49(D1):D1534-D1540
pubmed: 33166392
Proc AMIA Symp. 1999;:176-80
pubmed: 10566344
Nucleic Acids Res. 2013 Jan;41(Database issue):D456-63
pubmed: 23180789
Annu Rev Biomed Data Sci. 2021 Jul 20;4:313-339
pubmed: 34465169
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Oct 1;27(10):1529-1537
pubmed: 32968800
J Chem Inf Model. 2022 May 9;62(9):2035-2045
pubmed: 34115937
Chem Rev. 2017 Jun 28;117(12):7673-7761
pubmed: 28475312
Database (Oxford). 2013 Sep 18;2013:bat064
pubmed: 24048470
Pac Symp Biocomput. 2006;:28-39
pubmed: 17094225
BMC Bioinformatics. 2015 Apr 30;16:138
pubmed: 25925131
J Biomed Inform. 2007 Feb;40(1):30-43
pubmed: 16697710