Understanding depression treatment and perinatal service preferences of Kenyan pregnant adolescents: A discrete choice experiment.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
05
08
2022
accepted:
26
01
2023
entrez:
8
3
2023
pubmed:
9
3
2023
medline:
11
3
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Understanding mental health treatment preferences of adolescents and youth is particularly important for interventions to be acceptable and successful. Person-centered care mandates empowering individuals to take charge of their own health rather than being passive recipients of services. We conducted a discrete choice experiment to quantitatively measure adolescent treatment preferences for different care characteristics and explore tradeoffs between these. A total of 153 pregnant adolescents were recruited from two primary healthcare facilities in the informal urban settlement of Nairobi. We selected eight attributes of depression treatment option models drawn from literature review and previous qualitative work. Bayesian d-efficient design was used to identify main effects. A total of ten choice tasks were solicited per respondent. We evaluated mean preferences using mixed logit models to adjust for within subject correlation and account for unobserved heterogeneity. Respondents showed a positive preference that caregivers be provided with information sheets, as opposed to co-participation with caregivers. With regards to treatment options, the respondents showed a positive preference for 8 sessions as compared to 4 sessions. With regards to intervention delivery agents, the respondents had a positive preference for facility nurses as compared to community health volunteers. In terms of support, the respondents showed positive preference for parenting skills as compared to peer support. Our respondents expressed negative preferences of ANC service combined with older mothers as compared to adolescent friendly services and of being offered refreshments alone. A positive preference was revealed for combined refreshments and travel allowance over travel allowance or refreshments alone. A number of these suggestions were about enhancing their experience of maternity clinical care experience. This study highlights unique needs of this population. Pregnant adolescents' value responsive maternity and depression care services offered by nurses. Participants shared preference for longer psychotherapy sessions and their preference was to have adolescent centered maternal mental health and child health services within primary care.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Understanding mental health treatment preferences of adolescents and youth is particularly important for interventions to be acceptable and successful. Person-centered care mandates empowering individuals to take charge of their own health rather than being passive recipients of services.
METHODS
We conducted a discrete choice experiment to quantitatively measure adolescent treatment preferences for different care characteristics and explore tradeoffs between these. A total of 153 pregnant adolescents were recruited from two primary healthcare facilities in the informal urban settlement of Nairobi. We selected eight attributes of depression treatment option models drawn from literature review and previous qualitative work. Bayesian d-efficient design was used to identify main effects. A total of ten choice tasks were solicited per respondent. We evaluated mean preferences using mixed logit models to adjust for within subject correlation and account for unobserved heterogeneity.
RESULTS
Respondents showed a positive preference that caregivers be provided with information sheets, as opposed to co-participation with caregivers. With regards to treatment options, the respondents showed a positive preference for 8 sessions as compared to 4 sessions. With regards to intervention delivery agents, the respondents had a positive preference for facility nurses as compared to community health volunteers. In terms of support, the respondents showed positive preference for parenting skills as compared to peer support. Our respondents expressed negative preferences of ANC service combined with older mothers as compared to adolescent friendly services and of being offered refreshments alone. A positive preference was revealed for combined refreshments and travel allowance over travel allowance or refreshments alone. A number of these suggestions were about enhancing their experience of maternity clinical care experience.
CONCLUSION
This study highlights unique needs of this population. Pregnant adolescents' value responsive maternity and depression care services offered by nurses. Participants shared preference for longer psychotherapy sessions and their preference was to have adolescent centered maternal mental health and child health services within primary care.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36888596
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273274
pii: PONE-D-22-21937
pmc: PMC9994687
doi:
Types de publication
Review
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0273274Subventions
Organisme : FIC NIH HHS
ID : K43 TW010716
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2023 Kumar et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Pharmacoeconomics. 2014 Sep;32(9):883-902
pubmed: 25005924
Glob Soc Welf. 2018 Mar;5(1):11-27
pubmed: 29744286
Int J Womens Health. 2017 May 02;9:255-264
pubmed: 28496366
Pharmacoeconomics. 2008;26(8):661-77
pubmed: 18620460
Heliyon. 2018 Nov 27;4(11):e00965
pubmed: 30519659
Br J Psychiatry. 1979 Apr;134:401-5
pubmed: 444790
BMC Psychiatry. 2018 May 18;18(1):136
pubmed: 29776353
JAMA. 2007 Aug 1;298(5):519-27
pubmed: 17666672
Value Health. 2016 Jun;19(4):300-15
pubmed: 27325321
Glob Ment Health (Camb). 2016 Jul 27;3:e23
pubmed: 28596891
Soc Sci Med. 2014 Oct;118:33-42
pubmed: 25089962
Pharmacoeconomics. 2019 Feb;37(2):201-226
pubmed: 30392040
AIDS Behav. 2021 Feb;25(2):344-353
pubmed: 32683636
BMJ. 2004 Feb 14;328(7436):360-1
pubmed: 14962852
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2020 Sep 22;6:136
pubmed: 32974045
Value Health. 2011 Jun;14(4):403-13
pubmed: 21669364
PLoS One. 2016 May 06;11(5):e0155125
pubmed: 27153193
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017 Aug 11;5(8):e118
pubmed: 28801302
World Psychiatry. 2003 Jun;2(2):114-20
pubmed: 16946913
Lancet. 2020 Oct 17;396(10258):1223-1249
pubmed: 33069327
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 03;11(6):e0156629
pubmed: 27258096
Value Health. 2013 Jan-Feb;16(1):3-13
pubmed: 23337210
Health Econ. 2012 Feb;21(2):145-72
pubmed: 22223558
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2016 Jun;14(3):253-66
pubmed: 26992386
Bull World Health Organ. 2012 Feb 1;90(2):139G-149G
pubmed: 22423165
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jun 18;21(1):589
pubmed: 34144685
Reprod Health. 2015 Feb 19;12:13
pubmed: 25971731
Curr Opin Psychol. 2022 Jun;45:101291
pubmed: 35016086
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2016 Mar 08;10:19
pubmed: 26958075
Trop Med Int Health. 2020 Jan;25(1):15-32
pubmed: 31698531
Health Econ. 2002 Jul;11(5):457-65
pubmed: 12112494
BMJ. 2000 Jun 3;320(7248):1530-3
pubmed: 10834905
Ann Gen Psychiatry. 2021 Aug 17;20(1):37
pubmed: 34404421
Trials. 2016 Feb 03;17:64
pubmed: 26841875
J Affect Disord. 2012 Feb;136(3):340-9
pubmed: 22196052
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 1;16(4):e0248836
pubmed: 33793592
Am J Psychother. 2022 Jun 15;75(2):89-96
pubmed: 34915725
AIDS Care. 2021 Jul;33(7):873-878
pubmed: 32781831
J Affect Disord Rep. 2022 Dec;10:
pubmed: 36970124
Behav Res Ther. 2014 Sep;60:53-9
pubmed: 25064211
BMC Womens Health. 2018 Jun 15;18(1):96
pubmed: 29902989