The Effect of a Mobile Health App on Treatment Adherence and Revenue at Physical Health Clinics: Retrospective Record Review.
adherence
attrition
clinic charges and payments
completion of therapy
cost
health app
mHealth
mobile app
mobile health
mobile phone
payment
phone app
physical health
physical therapy
physiotherapy
reminder
Journal
JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies
ISSN: 2369-2529
Titre abrégé: JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101703412
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 Mar 2023
28 Mar 2023
Historique:
received:
13
10
2022
accepted:
05
03
2023
revised:
27
01
2023
medline:
9
3
2023
pubmed:
9
3
2023
entrez:
8
3
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
A significant number of patients do not adhere to their prescribed course of physical therapy or discharge themselves from care. Adhering to prescribed physical therapy, including attending physical therapy clinic appointments, contributes to patients achieving the goals of therapy including reducing pain and increasing functionality. Web-based platforms have been demonstrated to be effective means for managing clinical patients with musculoskeletal pain, similar to managing them in person. Behavior change techniques introduced through digital or web-based platforms can reduce nonadherence with prescribed physical therapy and improve patient outcomes. Literature also indicates that a phone-based app provided to patients, which includes a reward-incentive gamification to complement their care, contributed to a greater number of kept appointments in a physical therapy clinic. This study aims to compare the rate of provider discharge with self-discharge and the number of clinic visits among patients attending a physical health clinic who did and did not choose to adopt a phone-based app to complement their care. A secondary purpose was to compare the revenue generated by patients attending a physical health clinic who did and did not choose to adopt a phone-based app to complement their care. A retrospective analysis of all new outpatient medical records (N=5328) from a multisite physical health practice was conducted between January 2018 and December 2019. Patients in the sample self-selected the 2018 Usual Care, the 2019 Usual Care, or the 2019 Kanvas App groups. Kanvas is a customized private practice app, designed for patient engagement with their specific health care provider. This app included a gamification system that provided rewards to the patient for attending their scheduled clinic appointments. According to their medical record, each patient was classified as completing their prescribed therapy (provider discharged) or not completing their prescribed therapy (self-discharged). Additionally, the total number of clinic visits each patient attended, the total charges for services, and the total payments received by the clinic per patient were extracted from each patient's medical record. Patients in the 2019 Kanvas App Group exhibited a higher rate of provider discharge compared to patients who did not adopt the app. This greater rate of provider discharges among the patients who adopted the Kanvas app likely contributed to this group attending more clinic visits (13.21, SD 12.09) than the other study groups who did not download the app (10.72, SD 9.80 to 11.35, SD 11.10). This greater number of clinic visits in turn contributed to the patients who adopted the app generating more clinic charges and payments. Future investigators need to employ more rigorous methods to confirm these findings, and clinicians need to weigh the anticipated benefits against the cost and staff involvement in managing the Kanvas app.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
A significant number of patients do not adhere to their prescribed course of physical therapy or discharge themselves from care. Adhering to prescribed physical therapy, including attending physical therapy clinic appointments, contributes to patients achieving the goals of therapy including reducing pain and increasing functionality. Web-based platforms have been demonstrated to be effective means for managing clinical patients with musculoskeletal pain, similar to managing them in person. Behavior change techniques introduced through digital or web-based platforms can reduce nonadherence with prescribed physical therapy and improve patient outcomes. Literature also indicates that a phone-based app provided to patients, which includes a reward-incentive gamification to complement their care, contributed to a greater number of kept appointments in a physical therapy clinic.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
This study aims to compare the rate of provider discharge with self-discharge and the number of clinic visits among patients attending a physical health clinic who did and did not choose to adopt a phone-based app to complement their care. A secondary purpose was to compare the revenue generated by patients attending a physical health clinic who did and did not choose to adopt a phone-based app to complement their care.
METHODS
METHODS
A retrospective analysis of all new outpatient medical records (N=5328) from a multisite physical health practice was conducted between January 2018 and December 2019. Patients in the sample self-selected the 2018 Usual Care, the 2019 Usual Care, or the 2019 Kanvas App groups. Kanvas is a customized private practice app, designed for patient engagement with their specific health care provider. This app included a gamification system that provided rewards to the patient for attending their scheduled clinic appointments. According to their medical record, each patient was classified as completing their prescribed therapy (provider discharged) or not completing their prescribed therapy (self-discharged). Additionally, the total number of clinic visits each patient attended, the total charges for services, and the total payments received by the clinic per patient were extracted from each patient's medical record.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Patients in the 2019 Kanvas App Group exhibited a higher rate of provider discharge compared to patients who did not adopt the app. This greater rate of provider discharges among the patients who adopted the Kanvas app likely contributed to this group attending more clinic visits (13.21, SD 12.09) than the other study groups who did not download the app (10.72, SD 9.80 to 11.35, SD 11.10). This greater number of clinic visits in turn contributed to the patients who adopted the app generating more clinic charges and payments.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Future investigators need to employ more rigorous methods to confirm these findings, and clinicians need to weigh the anticipated benefits against the cost and staff involvement in managing the Kanvas app.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36889337
pii: v10i1e43507
doi: 10.2196/43507
pmc: PMC10131932
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e43507Informations de copyright
©Robert Topp, Jay Greenstein, Jena Etnoyer-Slaski. Originally published in JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technology (https://rehab.jmir.org), 28.03.2023.
Références
J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2019 Jul/Sep;42(3):E1-E16
pubmed: 28753136
JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2017 Dec 04;4(2):e11
pubmed: 29203460
J Grad Med Educ. 2011 Sep;3(3):350-5
pubmed: 22942961
BMC Public Health. 2013 May 06;13:449
pubmed: 23648225
Br J Health Psychol. 2019 Feb;24(1):10-30
pubmed: 29911311
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2021 Nov;51(11):CPG1-CPG60
pubmed: 34719942
Turk J Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Aug 09;64(1):52-58
pubmed: 31453489
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Feb;99(8):e19290
pubmed: 32080145
Man Ther. 2010 Jun;15(3):220-8
pubmed: 20163979
Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2019 Sep;62(5):356-365
pubmed: 31121333
Man Ther. 2010 Dec;15(6):514-21
pubmed: 20630793
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2022 Nov;52(11):726-739
pubmed: 35960507
Disabil Health J. 2019 Jul;12(3):411-421
pubmed: 31000498
JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2021 Dec 2;8(4):e31213
pubmed: 34655468
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Oct 22;6(10):e11231
pubmed: 30348633
PM R. 2019 Feb;11(2):167-176
pubmed: 30266349
J Med Internet Res. 2020 May 19;22(5):e17955
pubmed: 32427109
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Jan 02;17(1):e1
pubmed: 25565416
J Physiother. 2017 Jul;63(3):161-167
pubmed: 28662834
J Clin Med. 2022 Mar 24;11(7):
pubmed: 35407414
Physiother Theory Pract. 2020 Aug;36(8):886-898
pubmed: 30265840
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Feb 25;22(2):e14410
pubmed: 32130124
Patient Educ Couns. 2019 Jan;102(1):25-36
pubmed: 30279029