Population dynamics and genome-wide selection scan for dogs in Chernobyl.

Chernobyl dogs Environmental contamination Outlier analysis Population structure

Journal

Canine medicine and genetics
ISSN: 2662-9380
Titre abrégé: Canine Med Genet
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101763636

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 Mar 2023
Historique:
received: 05 12 2022
accepted: 16 02 2023
entrez: 8 3 2023
pubmed: 9 3 2023
medline: 9 3 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Natural and anthropogenic disasters can have long-lasting impacts on the genetics and structure of impacted populations. The 1986 Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant disaster led to extensive contamination of the local environment and the wildlife therein. Several ecological, environmental, and genetic studies reported various effects of this disaster on animal, insect, and plant species; however, little work has been done to investigate the genetics of the free-breeding dogs that occupy the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone (CEZ). We define the population genetic structure of two groups of dogs that reside within the CEZ, one around the reactor site itself and another living within Chernobyl City. We found little evidence of gene flow and a significant degree of genetic differentiation between the two populations dogs, suggesting that these are two distinct populations despite occupying areas located just 16 km apart. With an F Our genome scan highlighted outlier loci within or near genomic regions under directional selection, possibly in response to the multi-generational exposure faced. In defining the population structure and identifying candidate genes for these dog populations, we take steps towards understanding how these types of prolonged exposures have impacted these populations. Wildlife populations can be greatly affected by disasters, whether they are natural or man-made. Disasters that result in contamination or habitat destruction can result in population declines or influence wildlife adaptation to these adverse environmental changes. The Chernobyl nuclear power plant disaster released an enormous quantity of ionizing radiation into the surrounding environment. Abandonment of military and industrial facilities, as well as subsequent cleanup and remediation efforts, resulted in further environmental contamination by a variety of non-radioactive toxic metals, chemicals, and compounds. Earlier studies investigated local wildlife responses to some of these exposures. In this study, we address the impact of this disaster on the population structure of free-breeding dogs that live around the power plant and in the nearby city of Chernobyl. In particular, we use genetic approaches to understand how these two populations of dogs interact and their breed composition, so that we may begin to understand how these populations have adapted to over 30 years of exposure to this harsh environment. In this foundational study we determined that while the two local populations of dogs are separated by only 16 km, they have very low rates of interpopulation migration. We also detected genetic evidence that suggests that these population may have adapted to exposures faced over many generations. In future studies, we aim to determine if the genetic variation detected is indeed a biological response to enable survival after multi-generational exposures to radiation, heavy metals, organic toxins, or other environmental contaminants. In this way, we then understand how the impact of environmental catastrophes such as the Chernobyl nuclear disaster can influence animal populations.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Natural and anthropogenic disasters can have long-lasting impacts on the genetics and structure of impacted populations. The 1986 Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant disaster led to extensive contamination of the local environment and the wildlife therein. Several ecological, environmental, and genetic studies reported various effects of this disaster on animal, insect, and plant species; however, little work has been done to investigate the genetics of the free-breeding dogs that occupy the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone (CEZ).
RESULTS RESULTS
We define the population genetic structure of two groups of dogs that reside within the CEZ, one around the reactor site itself and another living within Chernobyl City. We found little evidence of gene flow and a significant degree of genetic differentiation between the two populations dogs, suggesting that these are two distinct populations despite occupying areas located just 16 km apart. With an F
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Our genome scan highlighted outlier loci within or near genomic regions under directional selection, possibly in response to the multi-generational exposure faced. In defining the population structure and identifying candidate genes for these dog populations, we take steps towards understanding how these types of prolonged exposures have impacted these populations.
Wildlife populations can be greatly affected by disasters, whether they are natural or man-made. Disasters that result in contamination or habitat destruction can result in population declines or influence wildlife adaptation to these adverse environmental changes. The Chernobyl nuclear power plant disaster released an enormous quantity of ionizing radiation into the surrounding environment. Abandonment of military and industrial facilities, as well as subsequent cleanup and remediation efforts, resulted in further environmental contamination by a variety of non-radioactive toxic metals, chemicals, and compounds. Earlier studies investigated local wildlife responses to some of these exposures. In this study, we address the impact of this disaster on the population structure of free-breeding dogs that live around the power plant and in the nearby city of Chernobyl. In particular, we use genetic approaches to understand how these two populations of dogs interact and their breed composition, so that we may begin to understand how these populations have adapted to over 30 years of exposure to this harsh environment. In this foundational study we determined that while the two local populations of dogs are separated by only 16 km, they have very low rates of interpopulation migration. We also detected genetic evidence that suggests that these population may have adapted to exposures faced over many generations. In future studies, we aim to determine if the genetic variation detected is indeed a biological response to enable survival after multi-generational exposures to radiation, heavy metals, organic toxins, or other environmental contaminants. In this way, we then understand how the impact of environmental catastrophes such as the Chernobyl nuclear disaster can influence animal populations.

Autres résumés

Type: plain-language-summary (eng)
Wildlife populations can be greatly affected by disasters, whether they are natural or man-made. Disasters that result in contamination or habitat destruction can result in population declines or influence wildlife adaptation to these adverse environmental changes. The Chernobyl nuclear power plant disaster released an enormous quantity of ionizing radiation into the surrounding environment. Abandonment of military and industrial facilities, as well as subsequent cleanup and remediation efforts, resulted in further environmental contamination by a variety of non-radioactive toxic metals, chemicals, and compounds. Earlier studies investigated local wildlife responses to some of these exposures. In this study, we address the impact of this disaster on the population structure of free-breeding dogs that live around the power plant and in the nearby city of Chernobyl. In particular, we use genetic approaches to understand how these two populations of dogs interact and their breed composition, so that we may begin to understand how these populations have adapted to over 30 years of exposure to this harsh environment. In this foundational study we determined that while the two local populations of dogs are separated by only 16 km, they have very low rates of interpopulation migration. We also detected genetic evidence that suggests that these population may have adapted to exposures faced over many generations. In future studies, we aim to determine if the genetic variation detected is indeed a biological response to enable survival after multi-generational exposures to radiation, heavy metals, organic toxins, or other environmental contaminants. In this way, we then understand how the impact of environmental catastrophes such as the Chernobyl nuclear disaster can influence animal populations.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36890600
doi: 10.1186/s40575-023-00124-1
pii: 10.1186/s40575-023-00124-1
pmc: PMC9993684
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1

Informations de copyright

© 2023. The Author(s).

Références

Endocr Pathol. 2006 Winter;17(4):307-17
pubmed: 17525478
G3 (Bethesda). 2019 Jan 9;9(1):117-123
pubmed: 30429214
Bioinformatics. 2012 Dec 15;28(24):3326-8
pubmed: 23060615
Environ Sci Technol. 2020 Jun 16;54(12):7409-7419
pubmed: 32401030
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Apr 10;98(8):4563-8
pubmed: 11287657
Genetics. 2010 May;185(1):313-26
pubmed: 20176979
Science. 2010 May 28;328(5982):1164-8
pubmed: 20430971
Am Nat. 2016 Oct;188(4):379-97
pubmed: 27622873
Behav Ecol. 2021 Apr 02;32(4):646-656
pubmed: 34539241
Proc Biol Sci. 2015 Dec 7;282(1820):20152189
pubmed: 26631564
Trends Ecol Evol. 2016 Apr;31(4):281-289
pubmed: 26868287
Sci Total Environ. 2000 Nov 15;262(3):287-311
pubmed: 11087033
Environ Res. 2020 Jan;180:108816
pubmed: 31627157
Nucleic Acids Res. 2019 Jan 8;47(D1):D801-D806
pubmed: 30407599
BMC Genomics. 2020 Jan 29;21(1):94
pubmed: 31996125
Sci Rep. 2020 Aug 21;10(1):14083
pubmed: 32826946
Biochem J. 2009 Feb 1;417(3):639-50
pubmed: 19133841
Science. 2022 Apr 29;376(6592):eabk0639
pubmed: 35482869
Gigascience. 2015 Feb 25;4:7
pubmed: 25722852
Neuropharmacology. 2020 Mar 15;165:107816
pubmed: 31874168
Science. 2019 May 3;364(6439):455-457
pubmed: 31048485
Environ Int. 2021 Oct;155:106675
pubmed: 34120002
Sci Total Environ. 2001 Jul 2;274(1-3):161-9
pubmed: 11453293
Curr Biol. 2015 Oct 5;25(19):R824-6
pubmed: 26439334
Oecologia. 2012 Dec;170(4):1155-65
pubmed: 22707037
Bioinformatics. 2006 Feb 1;22(3):341-5
pubmed: 16317072
Bioinformatics. 2008 Jun 1;24(11):1403-5
pubmed: 18397895
Ecol Evol. 2019 Aug 24;9(18):10135-10144
pubmed: 31624541
Environ Sci Technol. 2020 Aug 18;54(16):10078-10087
pubmed: 32686935
Evolution. 1984 Nov;38(6):1358-1370
pubmed: 28563791
BMC Bioinformatics. 2008 Jul 28;9:323
pubmed: 18662398
Sci Rep. 2016 May 17;6:26062
pubmed: 27184191
Nat Genet. 2010 Jul;42(7):565-9
pubmed: 20562875
Curr Protoc Bioinformatics. 2019 Dec;68(1):e87
pubmed: 31756024
Int J Radiat Biol. 2022;98(6):1054-1062
pubmed: 32663058
Science. 2003 Dec 19;302(5653):2082-6
pubmed: 14684812
Front Oncol. 2012 Jun 04;2:58
pubmed: 22675673

Auteurs

Megan N Dillon (MN)

Department of Molecular Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.
Department of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.

Rachael Thomas (R)

Department of Molecular Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.

Timothy A Mousseau (TA)

Department of Biological Sciences, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.

Jennifer A Betz (JA)

Visiting Veterinarians International, 9825 SE Tower Dr, Damascus, OR, USA.

Norman J Kleiman (NJ)

Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.

Martha O Burford Reiskind (MOB)

Department of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.

Matthew Breen (M)

Department of Molecular Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA. Matthew_Breen@ncsu.edu.
Comparative Medicine Institute, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA. Matthew_Breen@ncsu.edu.
Center for Human Health and the Environment, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA. Matthew_Breen@ncsu.edu.
Cancer Genetics, UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. Matthew_Breen@ncsu.edu.
Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA. Matthew_Breen@ncsu.edu.

Classifications MeSH