Sacituzumab govitecan and radiotherapy in metastatic, triple-negative, and BRCA-mutant breast cancer patient with active brain metastases: A case report.
BRCA2
antibody-drug conjugate
brain metastases
sacituzumab govitecan
triple-negative breast cancer
Journal
Frontiers in oncology
ISSN: 2234-943X
Titre abrégé: Front Oncol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101568867
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
06
01
2023
accepted:
06
02
2023
entrez:
9
3
2023
pubmed:
10
3
2023
medline:
10
3
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive cancer subtype, owing to its high metastatic potential: Patients who develop brain metastases (BMs) have a poor prognosis due to the lack of effective systemic treatments. Surgery and radiation therapy are valid options, while pharmacotherapy still relies on systemic chemotherapy, which has limited efficacy. Among the new treatment strategies available, the antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) sacituzumab govitecan has shown an encouraging activity in metastatic TNBC, even in the presence of BMs. A 59-year-old woman was diagnosed with early TNBC and underwent surgery and subsequent adjuvant chemotherapy. A germline pathogenic variant in BReast CAncer gene 2 (BRCA2) was revealed after genetic testing. After 11 months from the completion of adjuvant treatment, she had pulmonary and hilar nodal relapse and began first-line chemotherapy with carboplatin and paclitaxel. However, after only 3 months from starting the treatment, she experienced relevant disease progression, due to the appearance of numerous and symptomatic BMs. Sacituzumab govitecan (10 mg/kg) was started as second-line treatment as part of the Expanded Access Program (EAP). She reported symptomatic relief after the first cycle and received whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) concomitantly to sacituzumab govitecan treatment. The subsequent CT scan showed an extracranial partial response and a near-to-complete intracranial response; no grade 3 adverse events were reported, even if sacituzumab govitecan was reduced to 7.5 mg/kg due to persistent G2 asthenia. After 10 months from starting sacituzumab govitecan, a systemic disease progression was documented, while intracranial response was maintained. This case report supports the potential efficacy and safety of sacituzumab govitecan in the treatment of early recurrent and BRCA-mutant TNBC. Despite the presence of active BMs, our patient had a progression-free survival (PFS) of 10 months in the second-line setting and sacituzumab govitecan was safe when administered together with radiation therapy. Further real-world data are warranted to confirm sacituzumab govitecan efficacy in this patient population.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive cancer subtype, owing to its high metastatic potential: Patients who develop brain metastases (BMs) have a poor prognosis due to the lack of effective systemic treatments. Surgery and radiation therapy are valid options, while pharmacotherapy still relies on systemic chemotherapy, which has limited efficacy. Among the new treatment strategies available, the antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) sacituzumab govitecan has shown an encouraging activity in metastatic TNBC, even in the presence of BMs.
Case presentation
UNASSIGNED
A 59-year-old woman was diagnosed with early TNBC and underwent surgery and subsequent adjuvant chemotherapy. A germline pathogenic variant in BReast CAncer gene 2 (BRCA2) was revealed after genetic testing. After 11 months from the completion of adjuvant treatment, she had pulmonary and hilar nodal relapse and began first-line chemotherapy with carboplatin and paclitaxel. However, after only 3 months from starting the treatment, she experienced relevant disease progression, due to the appearance of numerous and symptomatic BMs. Sacituzumab govitecan (10 mg/kg) was started as second-line treatment as part of the Expanded Access Program (EAP). She reported symptomatic relief after the first cycle and received whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) concomitantly to sacituzumab govitecan treatment. The subsequent CT scan showed an extracranial partial response and a near-to-complete intracranial response; no grade 3 adverse events were reported, even if sacituzumab govitecan was reduced to 7.5 mg/kg due to persistent G2 asthenia. After 10 months from starting sacituzumab govitecan, a systemic disease progression was documented, while intracranial response was maintained.
Conclusions
UNASSIGNED
This case report supports the potential efficacy and safety of sacituzumab govitecan in the treatment of early recurrent and BRCA-mutant TNBC. Despite the presence of active BMs, our patient had a progression-free survival (PFS) of 10 months in the second-line setting and sacituzumab govitecan was safe when administered together with radiation therapy. Further real-world data are warranted to confirm sacituzumab govitecan efficacy in this patient population.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36890829
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1139372
pmc: PMC9987211
doi:
Types de publication
Case Reports
Langues
eng
Pagination
1139372Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 di Mauro, Schivardi, Pedersini, Laini, Esposito, Amoroso, Laganà, Grisanti, Cosentini and Berruti.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
RP received consultancy fees from Novartis, Eli Lilly, Amgen, Gilead, Daichi Sankyo, Roche, Eisai, and Seagen. AB reported receiving grants and personal fees from Janssen Cilag and from Astellas, and personal fees from Bayer outside the submitted work. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
N Engl J Med. 2018 Nov 29;379(22):2108-2121
pubmed: 30345906
Ann Oncol. 2021 Sep;32(9):1148-1156
pubmed: 34116144
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Jul 11;14(14):
pubmed: 35884431
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2020 Oct;19(10):711-736
pubmed: 32884152
N Engl J Med. 2010 Nov 11;363(20):1938-48
pubmed: 21067385
Clin Breast Cancer. 2009 May;9(2):118-21
pubmed: 19433393
NPJ Breast Cancer. 2022 Jun 9;8(1):72
pubmed: 35680967
JAMA. 2019 Jan 22;321(3):288-300
pubmed: 30667505
N Engl J Med. 2017 Aug 10;377(6):523-533
pubmed: 28578601
Ann Oncol. 2019 Apr 1;30(4):558-566
pubmed: 30689707
N Engl J Med. 2021 Apr 22;384(16):1529-1541
pubmed: 33882206
Breast Cancer Res. 2020 Nov 30;22(1):131
pubmed: 33256829
Ann Oncol. 2021 Dec;32(12):1475-1495
pubmed: 34678411
J Neurooncol. 2020 May;148(1):165-172
pubmed: 32346837
J Med Chem. 2008 Nov 13;51(21):6916-26
pubmed: 18939816
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2022 Feb;19(2):91-113
pubmed: 34754128
Br J Cancer. 2021 Jan;124(1):142-155
pubmed: 33250512
Lancet. 2020 Dec 5;396(10265):1817-1828
pubmed: 33278935
Neuro Oncol. 2021 Jun 1;23(6):894-904
pubmed: 33367836
NPJ Breast Cancer. 2020 Oct 16;6:54
pubmed: 33088912
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2022 Apr 7;14:17588359221086916
pubmed: 35422881
Ann Oncol. 2021 Nov;32(11):1332-1347
pubmed: 34364998
Nat Med. 2018 May;24(5):628-637
pubmed: 29713086
Cancer Treat Rev. 2022 Dec;111:102468
pubmed: 36202026
BMC Cancer. 2019 Nov 8;19(1):1065
pubmed: 31703646
Eur J Cancer. 2021 May;149:134-152
pubmed: 33862496
Lancet. 2021 May 8;397(10286):1750-1769
pubmed: 33812473
Cancer. 1999 Apr 1;85(7):1599-605
pubmed: 10193952
Breast. 2017 Feb;31:90-98
pubmed: 27829201
Oncotarget. 2015 Sep 8;6(26):22496-512
pubmed: 26101915
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Sep 16;13:977660
pubmed: 36188535
Drug Discov Today. 2022 May;27(5):1298-1314
pubmed: 35101641
Cancer J. 2021 Jan-Feb 01;27(1):8-16
pubmed: 33475288
BMC Cancer. 2021 Mar 4;21(1):223
pubmed: 33663447
N Engl J Med. 2018 Aug 23;379(8):753-763
pubmed: 30110579
Cancer. 2006 Sep 15;107(6):1348-54
pubmed: 16909414